are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?

    My flats have people i'm sure who live away. Neighbours can't confirm who is renting or leaseholder. It's a RMC. It got me thinking about votes of the members and how to get them. An online survey seemed practical (we do it at work). Has anyone know if a survey can be used as a way of voting for things, or has it got to be bums on seats and hands up, or done on a paper slip? when people can even live overseas, seems practical if nothing else! Any suggestions welcome cheers

    #2
    Companies don't work that way. You send out notices for meetings to the address for service of each lessee (which the company will know). You also send out proxy voting notices when relevant. If lessees don't get the notices because they don't actually receive post at the address for service, that's hard lines.

    Comment


      #3
      You have to look at the company articles.

      Often people without a UK address are not entitled to be invited.

      Ballots generally have to be done either as postal ballots, by proxy or by people who are able to fully participate in the meeting. It is possible to have articles that allow participation to be electronic, but everyone must know what everyone else is saying.

      Many large membership societies allow proxy preferences to be recorded electronically, but they are still technically proxy votes.

      RTM articles generally cannot be changed, but allow for teleconferencing type meetings (as long as everyone can fully participate in the debate). For RMCs, it will depend on how old the articles are.

      Although electronic nomination of proxies has a similar effect to what you want, it is always better for people to be exposed to the debate.

      Postal ballots have quite a long timeout if not enough people vote to establish a clear majority, and best for cases where there is no need for debate.

      Comment


        #4
        Regarding formal meetings of members. you can send out and receive proxy forms by email, as long as the notice of the meeting states that is an option. You should keep a written record of decisions made by members so the proxy forms should be retained so that they may be produced if necessary,

        There is nothing to stop a Company from holding informal meetings and arranging online surveys. The results would not be legally binding on the Company but the directors could use the results to make decisions.

        Comment


          #5
          There's nothing to stop you having online meetings (if not prohibited by your constitution - which is unlikely for an RMC) so you can teleconference on whatsapp or similar.
          You just need to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to participate so decisions can't be questioned subsequently.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Section20z View Post
            There's nothing to stop you having online meetings (if not prohibited by your constitution - which is unlikely for an RMC) so you can teleconference on whatsapp or similar.
            You just need to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to participate so decisions can't be questioned subsequently.
            Well, maybe sort of. For example shareholders do not have to accept E-mail as an address for service.

            Questioning of decisions by companies has nothing at all to do with whether everyone has the opportunity to participate. It is rule/law based.

            Comment


              #7
              I agree that everyone must be allowed to participate and that is the problem, not everyone has access to online facilities .Some people actually prefer the old fashioned idea of meeting and speaking to members.

              Comment


                #8
                that's a lot thoughtful and helpful answers, cheers

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Reply to Leasehold remortgage
                  by LC4OA
                  A reserve fund is for major works and is provided for in the lease. However, agents are trying to take £1500 for a contingency fund which they say covers risk assessments and surveys although assessments/surveys that have been undertaken have also been demanded under separate headings in service charge....
                  25-01-2020, 23:31 PM
                • Leasehold remortgage
                  by LC4OA
                  I’m in the process of remortgaging my leasehold property. I’m in dispute with the managing agents over historic section 20 notice of intention failures for two sets of major works and for me not paying into a contingency fund, for which there is no provision in my lease. The arrears equal £3k....
                  25-01-2020, 17:06 PM
                • Help - Loft Demise - Lease - Trespassing??
                  by Mrmckenzie74
                  Hi all!

                  Hope you're all well?

                  I'm new here so I hope you don't mind my direct approach.
                  I may be in a bit of a pickle and could really do with a bit of advice on the following...

                  Snap shot:

                  Top floor flat

                  Purpose built maisonettes...
                  24-01-2020, 16:51 PM
                • Reply to Help - Loft Demise - Lease - Trespassing??
                  by Mrmckenzie74
                  ​​​​Are you sure on above, as Lawcruncher usually says if the hatch is in your flat, the loft belongs to you ( which I always disagree with.)

                  - Apologies, I said freeholder instead of leaseholder...

                  Regarding a hatch in your ceiling - where else can it be put. Build...
                  25-01-2020, 22:54 PM
                • Section 20 Major Works: undisclosed connection between landlord and winning bidder
                  by AB2017
                  Hi, our landlord is running a section 20 consultation for a major works contract. He obtained three quotes, one very high, the second very slightly cheaper and the third very low. The third was disqualified, purportedly on the grounds that they must have misunderstood the job. The second bidder has...
                  25-01-2020, 22:33 PM
                • Getting rid of a build in wardrobe
                  by annaV
                  Hi all,

                  I am in the process of buyig a leasefold flat (110 years remaining). The master bedroom has a build in wardrobe, which is shown on the footprint. The flat has a second box room, which I intend turning into a walk-in closet as I live on my own and have plenty of things I need to...
                  25-01-2020, 14:12 PM
                • Reply to Getting rid of a build in wardrobe
                  by scot22
                  As a general rule I say always ask. Then you have been open and that should avoid any future problem. For any situation good communication is beneficial. If you ask before exchanging contracts and there are any issues you are forewarned and possibly negotiate price reduction.
                  25-01-2020, 22:23 PM
                • Reply to Leasehold remortgage
                  by AndrewDod
                  What's the difference between a reserve fund (which you say you paid) and a contingency fund (which you say is not provided for in lease)?

                  Who else paid for stuff - we presume the other lessees in the building are out of pocket somehow?

                  What timescale -- was this 10 years ago,...
                  25-01-2020, 20:57 PM
                • Directors Appointment and change of registered address
                  by ZIGGYVIGGY
                  Sequence of events:

                  2 directors ( both leaseholders) incorporated an RTM. RTM application was made successfully with support of 51 percent lease holders back in 2016

                  1. Freeholders managing agent was asked to leave. At this point reserves held were £55k and service charge...
                  12-01-2020, 16:46 PM
                • Reply to Directors Appointment and change of registered address
                  by ZIGGYVIGGY
                  Mr.Soffit thanks again for the elaborate email and apologies for a delayed response.
                  We are still waiting for the bank to revert. They say the new mandate is being processes. If the bank sorts this out in the next few days that will save us from pain of going thru setting up another account....
                  25-01-2020, 20:33 PM
                Working...
                X