If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Definitely avoid accusations, take copies and casually state that they were left out.
I once heard a barrister use the phrase " this was either a simple error or a deliberate lie in an attempt to mislead" which I thought was quite nice but maybe OTT 😉
FTT/LVT rulings are online so try and find some involving the same management company to refer to, and hopefully the panel members will have dealt with them before and will draw their own conclusions to the ommissions.
what region are you attending ?
Thank you Eagle. So to clarify I write to the address on the directions and use the email address from the same document. The problem is the hearing is so soon that a letter might not even be out of their in tray by the time the hearing has taken place.
The other side arguably used tactics in putting together the bundle to disadvantage me though I do not doubt they will present plausible reasons. I will state the facts related to the bundle and avoid accusations but in my own mind feel positive items were left out or added to benefit them.
I understand it is expensive to adjourn a hearing but feel the hearing should be postponed. From comments LLZ this is unlikely to happen.
If the hearing is very soon, I would telephone the Tribunal office and speak to the named clerk and then back it up with an email, which should be copied to the applicant.
I am sure that you are right about the documents being omitted intentionally, you should state the facts and leave the applicant to explain. You can then comment on any explanation and ask the Tribunal to decide whether or not the applicant has complied with the directions and to make an appropriate order when the question of costs is considered.
It is not worth asking for new documents to be disregarded, that only draws attention to them and they have already been produced. It is a question of whether or not you have seen the documents before and whether or not you need more time to respond to them. Do your best to respond and be prepared to explain why you cannot answer fully and why you should be allowed time to find other documents in response. An adjournment is a possibility but more likely you would be given time to submit a written response specifically and limited to the new documents after the hearing.
Where the garages are is not conducive to any other building but garages. As a side note not all the flats came with a garage, perhaps thats why some were sold ok. 1 was going to be bought by a BTL landlord and they pulled out. Crazy situation but never mind now, you never know this buyer may still...
Hi, am selling my flat that has a long lease but the garage that comes with it has a separate lease which only has 41yrs left. Started the lease extension through the management company and got the quote from them for new length of lease and cost so process was all started.
Thanks guys, well I am lucky in that I am in the position that I do not have to sell, only reason for selling was to buy my eldest son a place of his own. This is the 2nd buyer now, 1st was a BTL landlord and I will find out if this 2nd one pulls out or buys next week, I would imagine the latter to...
I suggest you buy a copy of the site plan for freehold title of building from Land Registry Online website. It costs £3 to download and check if garage is within site boundary . You may have to seek a 90 year lease extension for your maisonette and garage ( apurtenant property as Lawcruncher...
The Garage is just around the corner and access is from a service ally and is marked on the lease for the flat as are all the garages that come with these maisonettes. The maisonette has a 940+yr lease left, garage 41yrs. I cannot seem to sell the property without extending garage lease. Garage is on...
The garage lease not being a residential lease would not be effected by the leasehold reform (ground rent) act 2002 - so a lease extension can contain a ground rent and you have no statutory right to extend the lease...
For a few years, to keep the service charge down, our RMC has externally re-decorated every 7 years instead of every 5, as stipulated by the lease. In practical terms this makes no difference, and the freeholder/landlord is unbothered (as far as anyone knows, they are passive investors). Now one leaseholder...
Comment