MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

    Hi all

    We applied for RTM in Dec 2017, and then again in June 2018. About a week after our second application, our MA triggered a section 20 major works notification and employed the services of a surveyor to produce a spec. We objected to this and said that it wasn't appropriate to trigger major works with RTM in progress. They effectively said that until RTM was complete, they still managed the building and would do what they had to. This was in 2018.

    Now it's 2019 we have our RTM, but I've received a £400 balancing charge for the year 2018. The additional costs appear to be for the surveyor which we told them not to employ.

    Is it worth me applying to FTT for a determination as to whether or not this is payable? I don't dispute that the surveying work was done, I dispute that it was either necessary or appropriate.

    #2
    Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
      Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.
      Quite possible. I'm not quite trying to get out of paying - if this is a reasonable request for payment then I'll most likely pay it - I just want to see if this is a fair request, doesn't feel like it to me but I may be biased

      Comment


        #4
        Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

        It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

        Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
          Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

          It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

          Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)
          Ha well I agree with you personally but I also believe in fair play - it's one of my greatest weaknesses. The major works never actually got done - we got our RTM before they began - so this is just literally the surveyor costs involved in drawing up the spec which never got delivered.

          Comment


            #6
            It is a pity that your freeholder and agent doesn't also believe in fair play.

            If you can use the spec then it may be worth offering to pay for it on condition that you receive it, If you have not received the benefit of a service then you can argue that there is nothing to pay.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Bullying from a joint freeholder
              by goodgirlLondon
              Hey, I would really like some advice about this as I am a female who lives alone and I am getting worried. The couple who I share the freehold with (just 2 flats in the house), dont get along and we have had problems agreeing over maintenance. I avoid them as much as possible but a neighbour told me...
              23-11-2021, 17:13 PM
            • Reply to Bullying from a joint freeholder
              by Stew
              That seems like a great idea letting out a spare room. Make sure its someone who would not feel intimidated. Also agree with Xmas cards every bit helps. Also tell all contractors not to engage with them at all and ignore them....
              26-11-2021, 15:05 PM
            • Reply to Bullying from a joint freeholder
              by goodgirlLondon
              Hey, I have thought about renting but I love my flat and had expensive new kitchen put in. Not sure I would be happy if tenants damaged. Also, I think that my mortgage restricts letting out my flat. I love the area and was happy until the couple took over the joint freehold. I might get a tenant to...
              26-11-2021, 10:31 AM
            • Reply to Service charge arrears
              by lampshade
              Yes of course I do not need to know any details other than the current situation. So I will ask and see if I get a reply....
              26-11-2021, 10:02 AM
            • Service charge arrears
              by lampshade
              If I asked the managing agents for a situation report regarding overall arrears of service charge, are they duty bound to let me know. not by flat,of course, but as a % of total invoiced, with info regarding length of arrears?
              26-11-2021, 07:54 AM
            • Reply to Service charge arrears
              by eagle2
              There is no reason why you cannot request and no reason why the managing agent cannot supply general information regarding the level of service charge arrears. It would only become an issue if any personal information was supplied or could be identified,
              26-11-2021, 09:24 AM
            • Reply to Service charge arrears
              by lampshade
              OK....no i am not one of those........ but seems odd then that the managing agent was very quick to tell all leaseholders in writing that a certain % of leaseholders had paid in advance of a large section 20, by way of coercion to those who had not paid.
              26-11-2021, 08:39 AM
            • Reply to Service charge arrears
              by Section20z
              Only if you're the freeholder or employer (RMC etc), not if you are just a flat owner...
              26-11-2021, 08:10 AM
            • Reply to Bullying from a joint freeholder
              by Stew
              Have you thought about renting the place and just giving the old neighbour an email address for communication with an auto response saying I only pick up email from this account once a month. Not ideal but another option.
              25-11-2021, 22:45 PM
            • Access to my garden for upstairs neighbour's loft conversion
              by sampsam
              Would appreciate any thoughts or advice from the forum on this matter.

              I own the garden flat in block of 4, share of freehold equally split. Top floor neighbour wants to do loft conversion and build an extra floor on closet wing (roof terrace belongs to freehold).

              I am not...
              19-11-2021, 01:16 AM
            Working...
            X