MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

    Hi all

    We applied for RTM in Dec 2017, and then again in June 2018. About a week after our second application, our MA triggered a section 20 major works notification and employed the services of a surveyor to produce a spec. We objected to this and said that it wasn't appropriate to trigger major works with RTM in progress. They effectively said that until RTM was complete, they still managed the building and would do what they had to. This was in 2018.

    Now it's 2019 we have our RTM, but I've received a £400 balancing charge for the year 2018. The additional costs appear to be for the surveyor which we told them not to employ.

    Is it worth me applying to FTT for a determination as to whether or not this is payable? I don't dispute that the surveying work was done, I dispute that it was either necessary or appropriate.

    #2
    Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
      Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.
      Quite possible. I'm not quite trying to get out of paying - if this is a reasonable request for payment then I'll most likely pay it - I just want to see if this is a fair request, doesn't feel like it to me but I may be biased

      Comment


        #4
        Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

        It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

        Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
          Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

          It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

          Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)
          Ha well I agree with you personally but I also believe in fair play - it's one of my greatest weaknesses. The major works never actually got done - we got our RTM before they began - so this is just literally the surveyor costs involved in drawing up the spec which never got delivered.

          Comment


            #6
            It is a pity that your freeholder and agent doesn't also believe in fair play.

            If you can use the spec then it may be worth offering to pay for it on condition that you receive it, If you have not received the benefit of a service then you can argue that there is nothing to pay.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by Section20z
              It may benefit older leases by removing "marriage value" from lease extensions but this would not help you _ and freeholders are also aware of imminent changes and may be more willing to negotiate prior.
              Speak with a specialist like Homehold.org who will negotiate on your behalf,...
              05-12-2021, 07:14 AM
            • Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by Isaac1400
              Hi,

              Hoping someone can advise. I am leaseholder and the landlord is a local council. my property is a flat and there are about 55 flats spread out over 3 floors.

              Now the problem is that over the years the council has failed to maintain the exterior and communal areas - including...
              02-12-2021, 07:13 AM
            • How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
              by Joubert
              I am a director of a Freehold Company of a small block of 28 flats in a popular residential area.

              Over the past few years the majority of flats have been purchased by investors who sublet the flats on ASTs.

              Although the leases between the Freehold Company and the lessees are...
              04-12-2021, 17:35 PM
            • Reply to How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
              by eagle2
              If the lease states that you may charge a registration fee of £10, that is the amount you may charge, you are not entitled to increase the charge unless the lease specifically allows an increase. Even then you would be limited to a reasonable amount and £100 would be considered to be unreasonable....
              05-12-2021, 06:55 AM
            • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by andydd
              I sued my freeholder for failure to maintain my driveway, judge was quite damning but I was only awarded £100 as hard to proof any loss BUT in your case it sounds you have exceptional worry over various incidents so yes you could sue and as I found out it was useful, I got costs too and its something...
              04-12-2021, 21:19 PM
            • Dilapidated Flat
              by scot22
              In a block of 24, unfortunately one flat has become dilapidated. The new owner has bought cheaply. She is now demanding the Freeholder pays to refurbish it claiming they have been negligent. Is there a reasonable case ?
              04-12-2021, 11:21 AM
            • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
              by scot22
              Thanks all. It was a great price, significantly below market value, plus in further negotiations a reduction to pay for any further work. This was identified by a surveyor. She is not clueless.....
              Artful in my research I read that can only claim for her ownership period.
              It is all i...
              04-12-2021, 19:33 PM
            • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
              by Isaac1400
              Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have heard of this. In summary do you know if this would benefit those with older leases and not on the builds which have has issues with rising ground rent etc?...
              04-12-2021, 19:09 PM
            • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
              by Macromia
              If a leaseholder can show that internal maintenance is required because of a freeholder's negligence (e.g. a failure to meet external maintenance obligations according to the terms of the lease), they will potentially have a claim against the freeholder and be entitled to expect the freeholder (the...
              04-12-2021, 16:59 PM
            • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
              by theartfullodger
              The previous owner might have had a case. The new owner I think only for claims for problems during their ownership. But ianal.

              Presumably she got a great price as it was so dilapidated
              04-12-2021, 16:51 PM
            Working...
            X