MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

    Hi all

    We applied for RTM in Dec 2017, and then again in June 2018. About a week after our second application, our MA triggered a section 20 major works notification and employed the services of a surveyor to produce a spec. We objected to this and said that it wasn't appropriate to trigger major works with RTM in progress. They effectively said that until RTM was complete, they still managed the building and would do what they had to. This was in 2018.

    Now it's 2019 we have our RTM, but I've received a £400 balancing charge for the year 2018. The additional costs appear to be for the surveyor which we told them not to employ.

    Is it worth me applying to FTT for a determination as to whether or not this is payable? I don't dispute that the surveying work was done, I dispute that it was either necessary or appropriate.

    #2
    Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
      Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.
      Quite possible. I'm not quite trying to get out of paying - if this is a reasonable request for payment then I'll most likely pay it - I just want to see if this is a fair request, doesn't feel like it to me but I may be biased

      Comment


        #4
        Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

        It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

        Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
          Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

          It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

          Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)
          Ha well I agree with you personally but I also believe in fair play - it's one of my greatest weaknesses. The major works never actually got done - we got our RTM before they began - so this is just literally the surveyor costs involved in drawing up the spec which never got delivered.

          Comment


            #6
            It is a pity that your freeholder and agent doesn't also believe in fair play.

            If you can use the spec then it may be worth offering to pay for it on condition that you receive it, If you have not received the benefit of a service then you can argue that there is nothing to pay.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Priorities for Leasehold Reform
              eagle2
              In no particular order
              All service charge monies must be held in a separate client bank account, someone eg the regulator should carry out random checks that it is being held correctly
              All reserve fund monies must be held in a separate client bank deposit account, monies paid in immediately...
              25-07-2019, 09:20 AM
            • Reply to Priorities for Leasehold Reform
              eagle2
              I do not hate everything leasehold at all, I just want a fair deal for leaseholders.

              At present, there is much which is wrong, which needs to be addressed. The vultures who abuse the system by inflating costs for their own benefit at the expense of leaseholders need to be stopped. The vultures...
              23-08-2019, 08:30 AM
            • are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?
              Fred22
              My flats have people i'm sure who live away. Neighbours can't confirm who is renting or leaseholder. It's a RMC. It got me thinking about votes of the members and how to get them. An online survey seemed practical (we do it at work). Has anyone know if a survey can be used as a way of voting for things,...
              22-08-2019, 19:11 PM
            • Reply to are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?
              eagle2
              I agree that everyone must be allowed to participate and that is the problem, not everyone has access to online facilities .Some people actually prefer the old fashioned idea of meeting and speaking to members.
              23-08-2019, 07:44 AM
            • Reply to Priorities for Leasehold Reform
              ram
              Putting aside your utter hate of anything leasehold.

              Directors of ANY Limited company, are there to make the decisions.
              If you want all leaseholders to decide on things, you make them all directors ( and don't come back saying they can all vote as leaseholders at a meeting convened
              ...
              23-08-2019, 07:40 AM
            • Reply to are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?
              AndrewDod
              Well, maybe sort of. For example shareholders do not have to accept E-mail as an address for service.

              Questioning of decisions by companies has nothing at all to do with whether everyone has the opportunity to participate. It is rule/law based....
              23-08-2019, 06:33 AM
            • Fire escape
              Paulsen
              The freeholder and their managing agent have neglected the wooden fire escape which now needs major repairs. I have emailed them several times during the past two years including pictures. My flat is a leasehold first floor flat in a converted house where the ground floor flat comes with the freehold....
              22-08-2019, 15:35 PM
            • Reply to Fire escape
              Section20z
              Sounds like your property is lacking H&S & Fire inspections, request managing agent complies with legislation or ask you local authority housing standards department to intervene or the fire brigade. I doubt it can be removed.
              23-08-2019, 06:17 AM
            • Reply to are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?
              Section20z
              There's nothing to stop you having online meetings (if not prohibited by your constitution - which is unlikely for an RMC) so you can teleconference on whatsapp or similar.
              You just need to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to participate so decisions can't be questioned subsequentl...
              23-08-2019, 06:10 AM
            • Reply to are online surveys allowed to be used to poll / vote in RMC / RTM?
              eagle2
              Regarding formal meetings of members. you can send out and receive proxy forms by email, as long as the notice of the meeting states that is an option. You should keep a written record of decisions made by members so the proxy forms should be retained so that they may be produced if necessary,
              ...
              23-08-2019, 05:48 AM
            Working...
            X