MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application

    Hi all

    We applied for RTM in Dec 2017, and then again in June 2018. About a week after our second application, our MA triggered a section 20 major works notification and employed the services of a surveyor to produce a spec. We objected to this and said that it wasn't appropriate to trigger major works with RTM in progress. They effectively said that until RTM was complete, they still managed the building and would do what they had to. This was in 2018.

    Now it's 2019 we have our RTM, but I've received a £400 balancing charge for the year 2018. The additional costs appear to be for the surveyor which we told them not to employ.

    Is it worth me applying to FTT for a determination as to whether or not this is payable? I don't dispute that the surveying work was done, I dispute that it was either necessary or appropriate.

    #2
    Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
      Can you not simply ignore the demand? I assume that the freeholder and its agent no longer has access to the service charge funds. It is unlikely that the freeholder will use its own monies to pursue the debt. If it does pursue the claim, the burden of proof would be on the freeholder. If you apply to the FTT, the burden of proof is on you.
      Quite possible. I'm not quite trying to get out of paying - if this is a reasonable request for payment then I'll most likely pay it - I just want to see if this is a fair request, doesn't feel like it to me but I may be biased

      Comment


        #4
        Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

        It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

        Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
          Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

          It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs, it is probably not worth starting an application to the FTT, you would have the costs and your time to consider. You should consider whether or not the freeholder would take legal action against you, it would not be worth his while either, especially if he does not have access to the service charge funds to finance the costs.

          Your options seem to be - pay the bill, challenge it via the FTT, wait for the freeholder to take action, or make an offer of settlement (50%?)
          Ha well I agree with you personally but I also believe in fair play - it's one of my greatest weaknesses. The major works never actually got done - we got our RTM before they began - so this is just literally the surveyor costs involved in drawing up the spec which never got delivered.

          Comment


            #6
            It is a pity that your freeholder and agent doesn't also believe in fair play.

            If you can use the spec then it may be worth offering to pay for it on condition that you receive it, If you have not received the benefit of a service then you can argue that there is nothing to pay.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Underlet registration fee
              Relentlessuk
              hi,

              My freehold management company, also known as the Devil, {Mod - name removed}, are requesting an £138 underlet registration fee from me. I realise its been discussed umpteen times but thought if I post the clause (attached) they are relying upon I might find someone with a better mind...
              02-08-2019, 19:02 PM
            • Reply to Underlet registration fee
              eagle2
              The solicitors are correct, the LVT does not have the power because it ceased to exist in June 2013.

              The FTT would also not have the jurisdiction to consider the charge because it is not a variable administration charge, you have the right to choose a fixed fee of £5 as stated by Lawcruncher...
              20-08-2019, 04:47 AM
            • HELP - lease clause
              Jake0254
              Hello

              Im due to complete on Monday which is the scariest part of this. I have a house cat. My lease is POORLY worded with a clause that says:

              " No pets may be kept in a flat and where the property is a house you must not keep any animal including livestock except a pet...
              16-08-2019, 23:15 PM
            • Reply to HELP - lease clause
              HazeltonLane
              The property agent told you you can get consent for a house cat.

              Your solicitor told you the lease says cats can be kept with consent.

              The HA told you that they would grant permission pending the information provided. Presumably they want to reserve the right to refuse if you...
              20-08-2019, 01:17 AM
            • Reply to Underlet registration fee
              leaseholder64
              The power seems to have existed since September 2004, which is before the FTT replaced the LVT (Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, Schedule 11).
              19-08-2019, 21:27 PM
            • Reply to HELP - lease clause
              Jake0254
              Yes that’s right, he interprets it the same way as the HA do - the HA have clarified their position that it is, in their opinion, a blanket ban on pets in flats. The solicitor would therefore then argue that such a term would be considered unfair and therefore not legally binding....
              19-08-2019, 20:55 PM
            • Reply to HELP - lease clause
              Jake0254
              I have already researched that case actually - the question in that case is whether the management company was reasonable in its refusal. This is quite different to this situation, whereby a blanket ban (which the HA are implying they have) allows no potential special circumstances to be taken into...
              19-08-2019, 20:52 PM
            • Reply to Underlet registration fee
              Relentlessuk
              Well its been two weeks and they still haven't responded to my request for the freeholders solicitors details. we shall see what happens....

              they did send previously a templated response saying that "the LVT does not have power to rule that a registration fee is unreasonable"....
              19-08-2019, 19:36 PM
            • Reply to HELP - lease clause
              Macromia
              My comment regarding livestock was intended to be tongue in cheek!
              I think that you'd have to be more specific than "indoors" though - factory farmed livestock might not see anything other than the inside of a building until loaded into a cramped truck to be taken for slaughter.
              ...
              19-08-2019, 18:29 PM
            • Reply to HELP - lease clause
              AndrewDod
              I tried to post a bunch of medical links on the health effects of cats in buildings to others in the building. But seemingly if you have more than a few links your post gets killed.

              Anyway, I'm with jpkeates (and most others) on this one. Perhaps OPs solicitor will help out with the 70K...
              19-08-2019, 16:34 PM
            Working...
            X