does solicitor no longer work for you after completion?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    does solicitor no longer work for you after completion?

    Hello guys

    After asking a question today to my solicitor, I received this response below

    Our instructions are now concluded in respect of the conveyancing and there is no further correspondence for us to forward to you apart from the completed HMLR registration which will be forwarded to you once received. Any further work is now outside of a normal conveyancing transaction and will incur a fee.

    This makes me question, how long after exchange/completion does solicitor no longer work for you? I guess they are still technically working for me until the completed HMLR registration? What's your experience?

    #2
    They are acting somewhat prematurely by saying that they have completed acting according to your existing instructions, subject to the HMLR registration, You can raise comments about the existing instructions but anything not strictly covered by those instructions would require fresh instructions and you would be required to pay additional fees.

    Comment


      #3
      Yes, I was wondering too so I did inquiry this with them...I'm curious what their response will be. Will let you know.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by TruthLedger View Post

        Yes, I was wondering too so I did inquiry this with them...I'm curious what their response will be. Will let you know.
        But expect a bill for their reply.

        Any further work is now outside of a normal conveyancing transaction and will incur a fee.

        Comment


          #5
          The wording does not look likely to have been put together by a marketing department. The time to tell someone a further fee will be incurred is when it is likely to be incurred.

          I do not know what current practice is, but I think that on the whole most solicitors used to provide some degree of after-sales service if the client has a query. Apart from anything else it is good marketing. There is a balance to be struck between the client who thinks he can keep on getting free advice and the solicitor who wants to charge just for getting the file out and checking something.

          You have of course paid the solicitor to secure a good and marketable title. If it turns out there is a problem he ought to have spotted he should not charge for putting it right.

          Comment


            #6
            Lawcruncher,

            Thanks. You mention "a good and marketable title" and now got me thinking. Does that mean solicitors can secure a bad title deed?What could they do wrong with securing a title deed? EDIT: I started a new topic "securing a good and marketable title deed"

            Comment


              #7
              I suspect that this is connected with your comments on one of your other threads regarding the service charge deficit.

              Your solicitor appears to be saying that he has collected the service charge deficit from the vendor on this occasion but if the freeholder raises any further charges which you want the solicitor to collect from the vendor, the solicitor reserves the right to charge you additional fees.

              The solicitor seems to be overlooking that he should have made the proper enquiries as to which charges had not been made but which were the vendor's responsibility for paying at the time of the sale.

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • Underlet registration fee
                Relentlessuk
                hi,

                My freehold management company, also known as the Devil, {Mod - name removed}, are requesting an £138 underlet registration fee from me. I realise its been discussed umpteen times but thought if I post the clause (attached) they are relying upon I might find someone with a better mind...
                02-08-2019, 19:02 PM
              • Reply to Underlet registration fee
                eagle2
                The solicitors are correct, the LVT does not have the power because it ceased to exist in June 2013.

                The FTT would also not have the jurisdiction to consider the charge because it is not a variable administration charge, you have the right to choose a fixed fee of £5 as stated by Lawcruncher...
                20-08-2019, 04:47 AM
              • HELP - lease clause
                Jake0254
                Hello

                Im due to complete on Monday which is the scariest part of this. I have a house cat. My lease is POORLY worded with a clause that says:

                " No pets may be kept in a flat and where the property is a house you must not keep any animal including livestock except a pet...
                16-08-2019, 23:15 PM
              • Reply to HELP - lease clause
                HazeltonLane
                The property agent told you you can get consent for a house cat.

                Your solicitor told you the lease says cats can be kept with consent.

                The HA told you that they would grant permission pending the information provided. Presumably they want to reserve the right to refuse if you...
                20-08-2019, 01:17 AM
              • Reply to Underlet registration fee
                leaseholder64
                The power seems to have existed since September 2004, which is before the FTT replaced the LVT (Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, Schedule 11).
                19-08-2019, 21:27 PM
              • Reply to HELP - lease clause
                Jake0254
                Yes that’s right, he interprets it the same way as the HA do - the HA have clarified their position that it is, in their opinion, a blanket ban on pets in flats. The solicitor would therefore then argue that such a term would be considered unfair and therefore not legally binding....
                19-08-2019, 20:55 PM
              • Reply to HELP - lease clause
                Jake0254
                I have already researched that case actually - the question in that case is whether the management company was reasonable in its refusal. This is quite different to this situation, whereby a blanket ban (which the HA are implying they have) allows no potential special circumstances to be taken into...
                19-08-2019, 20:52 PM
              • Reply to Underlet registration fee
                Relentlessuk
                Well its been two weeks and they still haven't responded to my request for the freeholders solicitors details. we shall see what happens....

                they did send previously a templated response saying that "the LVT does not have power to rule that a registration fee is unreasonable"....
                19-08-2019, 19:36 PM
              • Reply to HELP - lease clause
                Macromia
                My comment regarding livestock was intended to be tongue in cheek!
                I think that you'd have to be more specific than "indoors" though - factory farmed livestock might not see anything other than the inside of a building until loaded into a cramped truck to be taken for slaughter.
                ...
                19-08-2019, 18:29 PM
              • Reply to HELP - lease clause
                AndrewDod
                I tried to post a bunch of medical links on the health effects of cats in buildings to others in the building. But seemingly if you have more than a few links your post gets killed.

                Anyway, I'm with jpkeates (and most others) on this one. Perhaps OPs solicitor will help out with the 70K...
                19-08-2019, 16:34 PM
              Working...
              X