does solicitor no longer work for you after completion?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    does solicitor no longer work for you after completion?

    Hello guys

    After asking a question today to my solicitor, I received this response below

    Our instructions are now concluded in respect of the conveyancing and there is no further correspondence for us to forward to you apart from the completed HMLR registration which will be forwarded to you once received. Any further work is now outside of a normal conveyancing transaction and will incur a fee.

    This makes me question, how long after exchange/completion does solicitor no longer work for you? I guess they are still technically working for me until the completed HMLR registration? What's your experience?

    #2
    They are acting somewhat prematurely by saying that they have completed acting according to your existing instructions, subject to the HMLR registration, You can raise comments about the existing instructions but anything not strictly covered by those instructions would require fresh instructions and you would be required to pay additional fees.

    Comment


      #3
      Yes, I was wondering too so I did inquiry this with them...I'm curious what their response will be. Will let you know.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by TruthLedger View Post

        Yes, I was wondering too so I did inquiry this with them...I'm curious what their response will be. Will let you know.
        But expect a bill for their reply.

        Any further work is now outside of a normal conveyancing transaction and will incur a fee.
        To save them chiming in, JPKeates, Theartfullodger, Boletus, Mindthegap, Macromia, Holy Cow & Ted.E.Bear think the opposite of me on almost every subject.

        Comment


          #5
          The wording does not look likely to have been put together by a marketing department. The time to tell someone a further fee will be incurred is when it is likely to be incurred.

          I do not know what current practice is, but I think that on the whole most solicitors used to provide some degree of after-sales service if the client has a query. Apart from anything else it is good marketing. There is a balance to be struck between the client who thinks he can keep on getting free advice and the solicitor who wants to charge just for getting the file out and checking something.

          You have of course paid the solicitor to secure a good and marketable title. If it turns out there is a problem he ought to have spotted he should not charge for putting it right.

          Comment


            #6
            Lawcruncher,

            Thanks. You mention "a good and marketable title" and now got me thinking. Does that mean solicitors can secure a bad title deed?What could they do wrong with securing a title deed? EDIT: I started a new topic "securing a good and marketable title deed"

            Comment


              #7
              I suspect that this is connected with your comments on one of your other threads regarding the service charge deficit.

              Your solicitor appears to be saying that he has collected the service charge deficit from the vendor on this occasion but if the freeholder raises any further charges which you want the solicitor to collect from the vendor, the solicitor reserves the right to charge you additional fees.

              The solicitor seems to be overlooking that he should have made the proper enquiries as to which charges had not been made but which were the vendor's responsibility for paying at the time of the sale.

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                by Section20z
                It may benefit older leases by removing "marriage value" from lease extensions but this would not help you _ and freeholders are also aware of imminent changes and may be more willing to negotiate prior.
                Speak with a specialist like Homehold.org who will negotiate on your behalf,...
                05-12-2021, 07:14 AM
              • Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                by Isaac1400
                Hi,

                Hoping someone can advise. I am leaseholder and the landlord is a local council. my property is a flat and there are about 55 flats spread out over 3 floors.

                Now the problem is that over the years the council has failed to maintain the exterior and communal areas - including...
                02-12-2021, 07:13 AM
              • How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
                by Joubert
                I am a director of a Freehold Company of a small block of 28 flats in a popular residential area.

                Over the past few years the majority of flats have been purchased by investors who sublet the flats on ASTs.

                Although the leases between the Freehold Company and the lessees are...
                04-12-2021, 17:35 PM
              • Reply to How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
                by eagle2
                If the lease states that you may charge a registration fee of £10, that is the amount you may charge, you are not entitled to increase the charge unless the lease specifically allows an increase. Even then you would be limited to a reasonable amount and £100 would be considered to be unreasonable....
                05-12-2021, 06:55 AM
              • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                by andydd
                I sued my freeholder for failure to maintain my driveway, judge was quite damning but I was only awarded £100 as hard to proof any loss BUT in your case it sounds you have exceptional worry over various incidents so yes you could sue and as I found out it was useful, I got costs too and its something...
                04-12-2021, 21:19 PM
              • Dilapidated Flat
                by scot22
                In a block of 24, unfortunately one flat has become dilapidated. The new owner has bought cheaply. She is now demanding the Freeholder pays to refurbish it claiming they have been negligent. Is there a reasonable case ?
                04-12-2021, 11:21 AM
              • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
                by scot22
                Thanks all. It was a great price, significantly below market value, plus in further negotiations a reduction to pay for any further work. This was identified by a surveyor. She is not clueless.....
                Artful in my research I read that can only claim for her ownership period.
                It is all i...
                04-12-2021, 19:33 PM
              • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                by Isaac1400
                Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have heard of this. In summary do you know if this would benefit those with older leases and not on the builds which have has issues with rising ground rent etc?...
                04-12-2021, 19:09 PM
              • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
                by Macromia
                If a leaseholder can show that internal maintenance is required because of a freeholder's negligence (e.g. a failure to meet external maintenance obligations according to the terms of the lease), they will potentially have a claim against the freeholder and be entitled to expect the freeholder (the...
                04-12-2021, 16:59 PM
              • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
                by theartfullodger
                The previous owner might have had a case. The new owner I think only for claims for problems during their ownership. But ianal.

                Presumably she got a great price as it was so dilapidated
                04-12-2021, 16:51 PM
              Working...
              X