Secret commissions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stacker
    replied
    Originally posted by Macromia View Post

    If you end up doing this, remember that, as a leaseholder, you will be responsible for paying a share of the cost if the work is the responsibility of the management company under the terms of the lease.

    It will probably help your case if you make sure that you only claim for the share that should be paid by other leaseholders and not the total cost (although you may well reasonably be able to add in some other costs as well as the cost of the work minus your share).
    Thank you Macromania I dont have an issue with paying my share, I understand this..my beef is other people expecting another to pay for the structural defects of the building, their ignorance and unwillingness to put matters right.

    This isn't about who is right and wrong its about doing what they should be doing repairing and maintaining the property in accordance with the lease and if it does go to court no I wont be paying the company costs as they have been negligent and as a shareholder I am only liable for the £1 liability, nothing in articles say I would need to pay the company costs when the directors and company are in breach of contract and not meeting the performance obligations of the lease.

    Leave a comment:


  • Macromia
    replied
    Originally posted by Stacker View Post
    ...if they dont I will get the work done and sue for the money back.
    If you end up doing this, remember that, as a leaseholder, you will be responsible for paying a share of the cost if the work is the responsibility of the management company under the terms of the lease.

    It will probably help your case if you make sure that you only claim for the share that should be paid by other leaseholders and not the total cost (although you may well reasonably be able to add in some other costs as well as the cost of the work minus your share).

    Leave a comment:


  • Stacker
    replied
    Thank you Scot...I am following the advice of the professionals ...in case I am not doing anything in accordance with the lease. So far I have obtained a chartered surveyors professional opinion and now the lease is with a solicitor with a copy of the surveyors report. Next will be the other reports.

    I shall be obtaining them to compare and contrast what needs to be done and then solicitor will take a view and write to the directors. I will write to the directors once I have a better picture and a clearer solution to the issues...I will invite one to attend my flat for a brief meeting so they can view and then give them a certain time frame to come up with a plan of action...if they dont I will get the work done and sue for the money back.

    Leave a comment:


  • scot22
    replied
    I think you are handling this well. There is a self help procedure which you appear to be following.
    Good idea to have legal support. You may have to take this a long way to get work done.
    Inform others what is required with evidence. Give a time limit for it to be done otherwise you will do it and claim costs. Which they then must pay if you have been careful with your actions. Good luck

    Leave a comment:


  • Stacker
    replied
    Thanks...it will be the leaseholder route I am going that is why I put the question out there about getting the work assessed, costed and then presenting it to the other directors however its the same old same old when I say they are all responsible they throw back and say no we aren't and say I am responsible for addressing the issues...

    .its going around and around in circles, they aren't suffering my flat is and I now may well have to involve a solicitor to write to them as they are so ignorant...I have already suggested we all get a surveyors report and they agreed initially and then when I booked him they turned around and then said no...so I went ahead and glad I did....

    two builders are coming next week to assess the situation and I will be asking for their opinion and costs to put right and two waterproofing companies are coming to tell me about tanking solutions and the various options.

    I will again be asking for reports and costs to put right. As the information is falling on deaf years I am putting everything in writing to form a paper trail and record then will go the route of getting the solicitor to write to them. I will also be telling the building insurance people about the situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • fos333
    replied
    Originally posted by Stacker View Post

    Thanks but the directors wont turn up and they are the ones reffusing to accept that the work needs doing! Its me against four, I am outvoted every time.
    Dependant on your articles it doesn't matter if your directors refuse to attend as long as a quorum is established, usually two but check your articles.

    If a fellow leaseholder supports you, continue with the meeting and ensure that minutes are taken, record the meeting if you wish to ensure that there is a proper record of the minutes and decisions taken.

    If no other leaseholder supports your request then follow the complaints procedure of the managing agent if they are the company secretary and follow it through to the relevant ombudsman who should find in your favour that a meeting should be held if you do hold 20% of the voting rights.

    This seems to be an ongoing issue where you have not been able to progress. If I understand correctly you have two positions one as a member/shareholder where if it is four to one you will always be out voted and the other as a leaseholder.

    Dependant on the issues and your financial loss you may be better looking at your rights as a leaseholder and your CS report should have been able to direct you as to the action you should take.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stacker
    replied
    Thanks but the directors wont turn up and they are the ones reffusing to accept that the work needs doing! Its me against four, I am outvoted every time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tipper
    replied
    Talk to your neighbours to get support for an EGM.
    You can then present the case to as many leaseholders as possible and get a vote to get repairs undertaken. You could also get a vote of no confidence in the Directors whilst you're at it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Stacker
    replied
    Oh dear what a skeptic you are! Some crime is criminal and that is when they take action....there is an obligation to investigate or they can be reported to the Independent Office for Police Conduct.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewDod
    replied
    Indeed, ... and there are also lots of criminal matters where the police do have remit, and they aren't interested either, like:

    Theft
    Burglary (most are not investigated in any way)
    Trespass with damage to property
    Minor mugging
    Shoplifting
    Most car crime
    Child grooming
    Child rape

    They only really deal with major crimes like murder and kidnap these days I hear.

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    There are lots of criminal matters that aren't police responsibilities, e.g:

    Fly tipping;

    Failing to provide summary service charge accounts when reqeusted;

    Having fire hazards in communal areas

    Overcrowding houses

    etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stacker
    replied
    I disagree....the police are under an obligation to investigate any criminal matters....so how have you insured the building now? Surely this cant be right as its left everyone exposed.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewDod
    replied
    Yes, the insurance company voided the insurance (and consequently it is not possible to get insurance). The police are not likely to be interested in the fact that someone lied about past claims when gaining insurance, or that they lied about the nature of occupants. Hell they are not even interested in theft these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stacker
    replied
    AndrewDod,

    Lying to an insurance company is fraud so tell the insurance company, bring in the police and tell the fraudline.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewDod
    replied
    Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
    I would have thought the director was suable as an individual, by the company, in this case.

    In any case, an emergency EGM should have been called to remove him as a director, as no insurer is going to insure a company where a director is suspected of insurance fraud.
    Yes that sounds nice in theory but in practice not so much. In this case (as is often the case) the Director has a controlling interest (owning a slight majority of flats in the building).

    So they are unlikely to Direct the Company to sue themselves
    nor is there any mechanism to remove them

    This is THE FUNDAMENTAL problem with the whole idea of lessee owned companies. Once a single lessee takes a controlling interest, they are essentially not subject to most law in any form of actionable way (unlike an independent freeholder). And to make things worse, if they deliberately drive the company into strike off/crown control (or create non payable service charges), they profit from their fraud by being able to purchase the entire freehold without any way of stopping them, depriving others who originally purchased a share of the freehold of all of their interest.

    (I should add that this building is currently under a FTT appointed manager - but when the term of this manager ends it will be exactly back to where it was before)

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

Working...
X