Secret commissions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Stacker View Post

    Can you break down the 52%? Was this for insurance commissions only?
    Let me guess:

    Asbestos survey, Electrical inspection, health & safety inspection, accountancy... (Usual lucrative nonsense.)

    To save them chiming in, JPKeates, Theartfullodger, Boletus, Mindthegap, Macromia, Holy Cow & Ted.E.Bear think the opposite of me on almost every subject.

    Comment


      #17
      In many leases, the wording states the "Lessor has sole right to decided on the insured cover ".

      The Times dated 5 July 2019 carried the report about secret commission extracted from buildings insurance:

      " Freeholders and managing agents are overcharging leaseholders for the insurance of their flats, while also pocketing large commissions from the insurers. Campaigners for leasehold reform are calling on the government to crack down on the practice.

      Sir Peter Bottomley MP, the co-chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Leasehold and Commonhold Reform, says: “We believe unfair service charges cost leaseholders hundreds of millions of pounds each year with secret commissions on buildings insurance deals making up a large part of it. Regulators must do more to bring this corrupt practice against leaseholders to an end.”


      The above 2 paragraphs is all I could see free of charge. The paper charges £8 for 2 months reading.

      https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/l...ions-k39fz6x8f

      Comment


        #18
        Yes Gordon the CMA and the Office of Fair Trading are looking at this, unfair terms etc

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post

          Michelle - if you are representative of the LKP, I would strongly object to you being involved with the FTT. I am not saying that the FTT is perfect by any means but there is a layperson on the Tribunal, maybe the choice of layperson could be improved.
          And thats of course because it's a fair and balanced system and you can expect totally unbiased judgement.
          https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/l...outham-resigns

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by michelle230 View Post

            And thats of course because it's a fair and balanced system and you can expect totally unbiased judgement.
            https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/l...outham-resigns
            Michelle - Is your link relevant to this thread? You have posted the link before on a different thread,

            Comment


              #21
              "Back in 1998 a government minister said that leasehold “has its roots in the feudal system and gives great powers and privileges to landowners. It is totally unsuited to the society of the twentieth – let alone the twenty-first – century.” Why hasn't this abusive system been killed off yet? "
              This was a comment made in the same newspaper article.

              Comment


                #22
                The newspaper article again raised nothing new, it just identified that insurance commission can amount to 40% to 60% of the premium and that the commission can be shared by 3 different parties. There is nothing wrong with raising the subject again but you wonder why the practice has not been stopped before and the proposal for disclosure of part of the commission is hardly the solution.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by eagle2 View Post

                  Michelle - Is your link relevant to this thread? You have posted the link before on a different thread,
                  No. Apologies - I was aware of that. But it was relevant to your post.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    eagle2,

                    Disclosure is required so that the leaseholders know how much the policy has been inflated by. FTT tribunal cases state no more than 10% is acceptable because its to cover the claims handling should there be a claim so they can hardly charge hundreds for doing the work, the FTT know this and apply this....they base it on the time taken to manage any claims and if there are no claims then claiming a high commission is not justified. Also I found out that the brokers receive a commission from the insurance company for the volume of business they place with the insurer...so possibly the managing agent, freeholder and broker benefit at the expense of the leaseholder..

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Leaseholders pay up to 60% more for buildings insurance because of secret commissions, reports The Times

                      By Harry Scoffin The property section of The Times has this month been leading on calls to end opaque insurance arrangements for leasehold blocks. In a sign of how leasehold is now dominating the news agenda, the title’s investment editor Mark Atherton has published on the issue of secret commissions over two consecutive Saturdays. Leaseholders […]

                      Comment


                        #26
                        fos333,

                        RICS are always biased and in favour of protecting their own, its a sham!

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
                          Which estimated that leaseholders were being overcharged by £700 million per annum in 2011. The Select Committee noted that the leasehold sector is now larger and that figure is likely to be higher.

                          ARMA estimate that £1.3 billion of unprotected client money is held by managing agents.

                          That is the scale of the problem and explains why unscrupulous individuals have been attracted to the sector.
                          So why aren't the Financial Ombudsman Services doing anything about this? They could help oversee and regulate the commercial insurance business for flats as they do with all other financial products?

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
                            The newspaper article again raised nothing new, it just identified that insurance commission can amount to 40% to 60% of the premium and that the commission can be shared by 3 different parties. There is nothing wrong with raising the subject again but you wonder why the practice has not been stopped before and the proposal for disclosure of part of the commission is hardly the solution.
                            The solution is transparency and accountability, stop inflating the cost of the insurance to the leaseholders.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by michelle230 View Post
                              It's true and also difficult to prove especially if they own their own insurance broker as well.
                              Also will cost you if you have been added to a multi block policy where some of those properties are considered risky for a variety if reasons.
                              My F/H was found guilty of running an unauthorised HMO. Our insurance shot up even more!
                              So do you get to see the policy, invoice and are you able to ask for sight of/ disclosure of the commissions?

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Stacker View Post

                                RICS are always biased and in favour of protecting their own, its a sham!
                                This is the problem with a lot of regulations etc. that are supposedly in place to protect leaseholders.
                                'Best practice' isn't decided by organisations that are there to protect the interests of leaseholders, it is decided by organisations like RICS, ARMA and ICAEW - organisations whose primary objective is to protect the interests of managing agents, accountants, etc. who will be making money off leaseholders.

                                Comment

                                Latest Activity

                                Collapse

                                • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                                  by Gordon999
                                  Marriage value is payable in the compensation if the existing lease has fallen below 80 years remaining. It may benefit older leases if leaseholders are not required to pay the legal and surveyor costs for both sides.
                                  05-12-2021, 12:32 PM
                                • Reply to Lease variation
                                  by indiejanb
                                  eagle2,

                                  The management company is, though, specifically varying a restrictive clause in the lease. On that basis, I believe it needs a formal deed of variation to be lodged. Is that not correct?
                                  05-12-2021, 12:29 PM
                                • Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                                  by Isaac1400
                                  Hi,

                                  Hoping someone can advise. I am leaseholder and the landlord is a local council. my property is a flat and there are about 55 flats spread out over 3 floors.

                                  Now the problem is that over the years the council has failed to maintain the exterior and communal areas - including...
                                  02-12-2021, 07:13 AM
                                • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                                  by Section20z
                                  It may benefit older leases by removing "marriage value" from lease extensions but this would not help you _ and freeholders are also aware of imminent changes and may be more willing to negotiate prior.
                                  Speak with a specialist like Homehold.org who will negotiate on your behalf,...
                                  05-12-2021, 07:14 AM
                                • How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
                                  by Joubert
                                  I am a director of a Freehold Company of a small block of 28 flats in a popular residential area.

                                  Over the past few years the majority of flats have been purchased by investors who sublet the flats on ASTs.

                                  Although the leases between the Freehold Company and the lessees are...
                                  04-12-2021, 17:35 PM
                                • Reply to How much can the freeholder charge for registering details of a sublet?
                                  by eagle2
                                  If the lease states that you may charge a registration fee of £10, that is the amount you may charge, you are not entitled to increase the charge unless the lease specifically allows an increase. Even then you would be limited to a reasonable amount and £100 would be considered to be unreasonable....
                                  05-12-2021, 06:55 AM
                                • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                                  by andydd
                                  I sued my freeholder for failure to maintain my driveway, judge was quite damning but I was only awarded £100 as hard to proof any loss BUT in your case it sounds you have exceptional worry over various incidents so yes you could sue and as I found out it was useful, I got costs too and its something...
                                  04-12-2021, 21:19 PM
                                • Reply to Dilapidated Flat
                                  by scot22
                                  Thanks all. It was a great price, significantly below market value, plus in further negotiations a reduction to pay for any further work. This was identified by a surveyor. She is not clueless.....
                                  Artful in my research I read that can only claim for her ownership period.
                                  It is all i...
                                  04-12-2021, 19:33 PM
                                • Dilapidated Flat
                                  by scot22
                                  In a block of 24, unfortunately one flat has become dilapidated. The new owner has bought cheaply. She is now demanding the Freeholder pays to refurbish it claiming they have been negligent. Is there a reasonable case ?
                                  04-12-2021, 11:21 AM
                                • Reply to Legal Action Against Landlord - Local Council
                                  by Isaac1400
                                  Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have heard of this. In summary do you know if this would benefit those with older leases and not on the builds which have has issues with rising ground rent etc?...
                                  04-12-2021, 19:09 PM
                                Working...
                                X