Secret commissions

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Stacker View Post

    Can you break down the 52%? Was this for insurance commissions only?
    Let me guess:

    Asbestos survey, Electrical inspection, health & safety inspection, accountancy... (Usual lucrative nonsense.)

    Comment


      #17
      In many leases, the wording states the "Lessor has sole right to decided on the insured cover ".

      The Times dated 5 July 2019 carried the report about secret commission extracted from buildings insurance:

      " Freeholders and managing agents are overcharging leaseholders for the insurance of their flats, while also pocketing large commissions from the insurers. Campaigners for leasehold reform are calling on the government to crack down on the practice.

      Sir Peter Bottomley MP, the co-chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Leasehold and Commonhold Reform, says: “We believe unfair service charges cost leaseholders hundreds of millions of pounds each year with secret commissions on buildings insurance deals making up a large part of it. Regulators must do more to bring this corrupt practice against leaseholders to an end.”


      The above 2 paragraphs is all I could see free of charge. The paper charges £8 for 2 months reading.

      https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/l...ions-k39fz6x8f

      Comment


        #18
        Yes Gordon the CMA and the Office of Fair Trading are looking at this, unfair terms etc

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post

          Michelle - if you are representative of the LKP, I would strongly object to you being involved with the FTT. I am not saying that the FTT is perfect by any means but there is a layperson on the Tribunal, maybe the choice of layperson could be improved.
          And thats of course because it's a fair and balanced system and you can expect totally unbiased judgement.
          https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/l...outham-resigns

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by michelle230 View Post

            And thats of course because it's a fair and balanced system and you can expect totally unbiased judgement.
            https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/l...outham-resigns
            Michelle - Is your link relevant to this thread? You have posted the link before on a different thread,

            Comment


              #21
              "Back in 1998 a government minister said that leasehold “has its roots in the feudal system and gives great powers and privileges to landowners. It is totally unsuited to the society of the twentieth – let alone the twenty-first – century.” Why hasn't this abusive system been killed off yet? "
              This was a comment made in the same newspaper article.

              Comment


                #22
                The newspaper article again raised nothing new, it just identified that insurance commission can amount to 40% to 60% of the premium and that the commission can be shared by 3 different parties. There is nothing wrong with raising the subject again but you wonder why the practice has not been stopped before and the proposal for disclosure of part of the commission is hardly the solution.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by eagle2 View Post

                  Michelle - Is your link relevant to this thread? You have posted the link before on a different thread,
                  No. Apologies - I was aware of that. But it was relevant to your post.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    eagle2,

                    Disclosure is required so that the leaseholders know how much the policy has been inflated by. FTT tribunal cases state no more than 10% is acceptable because its to cover the claims handling should there be a claim so they can hardly charge hundreds for doing the work, the FTT know this and apply this....they base it on the time taken to manage any claims and if there are no claims then claiming a high commission is not justified. Also I found out that the brokers receive a commission from the insurance company for the volume of business they place with the insurer...so possibly the managing agent, freeholder and broker benefit at the expense of the leaseholder..

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Leaseholders pay up to 60% more for buildings insurance because of secret commissions, reports The Times

                      By Harry Scoffin The property section of The Times has this month been leading on calls to end opaque insurance arrangements for leasehold blocks. In a sign of how leasehold is now dominating the news agenda, the title’s investment editor Mark Atherton has published on the issue of secret commissions over two consecutive Saturdays. Leaseholders […]

                      Comment


                        #26
                        fos333,

                        RICS are always biased and in favour of protecting their own, its a sham!

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
                          Which estimated that leaseholders were being overcharged by £700 million per annum in 2011. The Select Committee noted that the leasehold sector is now larger and that figure is likely to be higher.

                          ARMA estimate that £1.3 billion of unprotected client money is held by managing agents.

                          That is the scale of the problem and explains why unscrupulous individuals have been attracted to the sector.
                          So why aren't the Financial Ombudsman Services doing anything about this? They could help oversee and regulate the commercial insurance business for flats as they do with all other financial products?

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
                            The newspaper article again raised nothing new, it just identified that insurance commission can amount to 40% to 60% of the premium and that the commission can be shared by 3 different parties. There is nothing wrong with raising the subject again but you wonder why the practice has not been stopped before and the proposal for disclosure of part of the commission is hardly the solution.
                            The solution is transparency and accountability, stop inflating the cost of the insurance to the leaseholders.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by michelle230 View Post
                              It's true and also difficult to prove especially if they own their own insurance broker as well.
                              Also will cost you if you have been added to a multi block policy where some of those properties are considered risky for a variety if reasons.
                              My F/H was found guilty of running an unauthorised HMO. Our insurance shot up even more!
                              So do you get to see the policy, invoice and are you able to ask for sight of/ disclosure of the commissions?

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Stacker View Post

                                RICS are always biased and in favour of protecting their own, its a sham!
                                This is the problem with a lot of regulations etc. that are supposedly in place to protect leaseholders.
                                'Best practice' isn't decided by organisations that are there to protect the interests of leaseholders, it is decided by organisations like RICS, ARMA and ICAEW - organisations whose primary objective is to protect the interests of managing agents, accountants, etc. who will be making money off leaseholders.

                                Comment

                                Latest Activity

                                Collapse

                                • Property Management bully behaviour
                                  boboligogo
                                  Hi everyone,

                                  I would highly appreciate any contribution to this post.

                                  I'll get straight to the point: I am a leaseholder in a block of 8 flats in Leeds. One of the flats belongs to the Freehold owner (Landlord). Ever since I purchased this property we were dealing with a rather...
                                  18-09-2019, 18:37 PM
                                • Reply to Property Management bully behaviour
                                  leaseholder64
                                  In reply to your off list questions (please do not do that).

                                  1) You never have a right to select the surveyor;

                                  2) You do not have a right to reject the section 20 proposed contractors and force a new round of consultation.

                                  Implied question: You do not have a right...
                                  21-09-2019, 15:58 PM
                                • RTM Co Director Accused of Self Dealing
                                  Holy Cow
                                  Dear forum members, I joined the forum this morning after searching the internet for help with a problem. My partner is a director of a right to manage company - they took over the running of their building a couple of years ago - and he's getting hassle from the other directors.

                                  He had...
                                  10-08-2019, 09:55 AM
                                • Reply to RTM Co Director Accused of Self Dealing
                                  AndrewDod
                                  If the late payment had any impact at all on other lessees (loss of a few pence of interest in the service charge account for example, and certainly any element of cross subsidisation) it is certainly not confidential.
                                  21-09-2019, 14:31 PM
                                • Reply to RTM Co Director Accused of Self Dealing
                                  Holy Cow
                                  Hello again, thanks for your replies.
                                  Hoping to put this to bed, but am inquisitive over one thing: if a meeting of members was called, could the late payment of service charges be used by the other directors, or is it confidential under GDPR?
                                  tks...
                                  21-09-2019, 14:06 PM
                                • Sharing cost
                                  Affinity
                                  Hello
                                  I am selling my flat. In order to do so I had to pay for a asbestos certificate which cost me £400+vat.
                                  Is it fair to ask the other freeholders to share the cost? The building has three flats and we share the freehold.
                                  Your views are appreciated.
                                  19-09-2019, 16:51 PM
                                • Reply to Sharing cost
                                  leaseholder64
                                  The initial build will be low risk for asbestos. The 1980s conversion was after limitations started being imposed, but might not be quite late enough. Of course, earlier maintenance may have added asbestos....
                                  21-09-2019, 13:38 PM
                                • Can you forfeit a 999 year lease for renting on Airbnb?
                                  2019 New Member
                                  Hi All,

                                  Can you successfully forfeit / gain possession of a 999 year lease for renting on Airbnb?

                                  The lease mentions not being allowed to let the apartment for a term less than 6 months and the lease in question is a 999 year lease from 1995.

                                  Thanks in advance...
                                  19-09-2019, 07:03 AM
                                • Reply to Can you forfeit a 999 year lease for renting on Airbnb?
                                  Holy Cow
                                  We've had this exact problem. Overseas owner contracted letting agent Haart to find a tenant, and within a few weeks there was a stream of AirBnb-ers and the local chipshop owner was the keyholder. Apparently there's a clause in Haart's letting contract that allows sublets to short term tenants and...
                                  21-09-2019, 13:12 PM
                                • Reply to Sharing cost
                                  Affinity
                                  Thanks for your replies.
                                  The building was build at the end of 19 century and converted into flats in the 80s
                                  21-09-2019, 12:59 PM
                                Working...
                                X