Secret commissions

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    On another thread I've suggested trying Swarblaw forum which I've found excellent. It has numerous law forums including one on Company law.

    Comment


      It should be the surveyor rather than the conveyancer who picks up that the property has a dpc.

      It is down to the conveyancer to check the planning title, but what he cannot do is guess what changes have been made to a property. If a conveyancer is told, for example, that a property has an extension, he can make the necessary enquiries.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
        It should be the surveyor rather than the conveyancer who picks up that the property has a dpc.

        It is down to the conveyancer to check the planning title, but what he cannot do is guess what changes have been made to a property. If a conveyancer is told, for example, that a property has an extension, he can make the necessary enquiries.
        The OP would already know that from the other multitude of threads he/she has posted on the same scenario/topic (with trivial variation). Time wasted.

        Comment


          See your other thread for lawcruncher's similar response. Moderator2 the various threads (about 4) should probably be merged.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Stacker View Post

            Thanks for sharing that Scot..its an interesting angle ...my damp issues trundles on....

            it would appear that in another court case that unless the lease covenants state what needs to be repaired and maintained ie structural foundations and damp then some work could be seen as improvements and some judge said that the freeholder can not expect to be given back an improvement to the property so if damp proofing is not in the lease it may well be classed as an improvement however I am not convinced about that as damp effects the property foundations of the building.

            Tanking does not protect the foundations (nor is there any reason it would given the position of application). If anything in can make them worse. Therefore this argument is not a valid one.

            Comment


              And the question is?

              Please please do not post any more one liner threads on the same overall scenario, with so little content as to make no feasible meaningful response possible. What does "not insuring properly" mean? See numerous other threads on insurance.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Stacker
                So it transpires that the directors who are clueless have not been insuring the building properly, exposing us all to financial loss we cant get rid of them as we have a minority shareholder situation.
                You appear to have raised the same point in previous threads, the response is likely to be the same.

                Comment


                  I think Andrew makes a valid point. You need professional advice from a surveyor ( solicitor ?) well versed in leasehold law.
                  Tanking is an issue in some of my threads. You end up going round in circles unless you have authoritative opinion which is on the legal AND building issues.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
                    And the question is?

                    Please please do not post any more one liner threads on the same overall scenario, with so little content as to make no feasible meaningful response possible. What does "not insuring properly" mean? See numerous other threads on insurance.
                    Andrew...as a flat owner also trying to help another flat owner we have found that as time goes on more issues are arising and whilst they come under the banner of say insurance, the issues are different hence the different posts so one post was about insurance commission, another was about insurance not being put in place for a building which has suffered movement so this is a different issue...

                    yes they all come under insurance but they are different issues hence they cant be all posted at once because they come up at different times and now we have another insurance question about running a business which is not allowed and may affect the insurance.

                    the intention is to get help on different points. Fair enough if all the queries come up at once then they could all be posted as one thread however that has not been the chain of events so far..so hence they have not been posted all at once..

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Not admitting or agreeing to service charge
                      Landlordintraining
                      Hi all,

                      A very quick question,

                      I want to pay my service charge and then take the freeholder to the FTT. Can someone give me some advice on what wording I should use in my email to the freeholder so as not to admit or to agree to the service charges?

                      I was simply...
                      23-10-2019, 16:08 PM
                    • Reply to Not admitting or agreeing to service charge
                      Macromia
                      Copies of any letters, or emails, that you have which state that you disagree with charges can be used as evidence that payment wasn't an admission that the amounts demanded were payable/reasonable.

                      The wording of anything sent at the time of payment isn't particularly important - as long...
                      23-10-2019, 20:56 PM
                    • Licence to Alter
                      vmart
                      Should the leaseholder be given the original signed copy of a Licence to Alter (LTA)? Our landlord created a deed (LTA) to provide us with permission for work we are planning but we were given a photo copy of the completed document but think we should retain the original.

                      Thank you.
                      21-10-2019, 09:48 AM
                    • Reply to Licence to Alter
                      vmart
                      Dear Leaseholder 64

                      Thank you. Yes, but if all parties sign two copies at the same time during a meeting and exchange copies then I assume there is nothing else that needs to be done....
                      23-10-2019, 18:28 PM
                    • Reply to Not admitting or agreeing to service charge
                      AndrewDod
                      Indeed but that may not apply to administration charges. I can't see any disadvantage to payment under protest anyway.

                      I suppose also that if the tenant is not wishing to pay because he has not been served properly or with statements of rights etc, payment might be taken as indicating that...
                      23-10-2019, 16:42 PM
                    • Reply to Not admitting or agreeing to service charge
                      AndrewDod
                      "... nor should my payment be construed in any way as constituting my agreement that the charges levied are correctly calculated according to the lease."

                      You are not admitting or otherwise to anything

                      You could mention that you plan to take the matter to FTT. Make...
                      23-10-2019, 16:41 PM
                    • Reply to Not admitting or agreeing to service charge
                      leaseholder64
                      Nothing should be necessary as the legislation says that paying does not constitute an admission that it was payable.
                      23-10-2019, 16:39 PM
                    • Action against surveyors handling s20 works
                      amorgan
                      Hi, we appointed surveyors to handle the s20 process for the Major Works that were needed to an estate we manage (purchased through RFR). We appointed them in December 2017. After lots of errors, oversights and unnecessary additions on their part we finally managed to get the scope of works agreed in...
                      23-10-2019, 10:46 AM
                    • Reply to Action against surveyors handling s20 works
                      eagle2
                      Any complaints should be referred initially to the surveyors. If you are unable to agree a course of action, they should have a dispute resolution service to which you can refer the complaint. Any tenders which were submitted in June 2018 are unlikely to apply today.

                      Many management companies...
                      23-10-2019, 11:10 AM
                    • S.20 works and difficult leaseholder
                      Emilycarter
                      Good morning
                      How much detail around a quote is needed to be give to Leaseholders in an s.20 situation? I am a joint freeholder of a converted building with 5 flats. We have some h&s works to be carried out in communal area and are going through the s.20 process, via Managing Agent. Two leaseholders...
                      22-10-2019, 15:51 PM
                    Working...
                    X