Lord Best report

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Lord Best report

    For anyone interested -

    Chapter 6 focus on Leasehold..

    https://www.gov.uk/government/public...g-group-report

    #2
    Thanks for posting the link. I'll have to read the report.

    Comment


      #3
      Do we need a new regulator?

      Time will tell but my initial view is that agents charges will increase if and when the proposals are implemented. The cost of training and membership of the regulator will be passed on to leaseholders.

      If the regulator suggests a list of fees which may be charged and a set of tariffs, that will become the minimum and then agents are likely to provide extreme examples of those fees being inadequate which is likely to increase the charges.

      More transparency is fine but the report seems to identify the problem of identifying when the agent fails to disclose information. Is it realistic to expect solicitors and accountants to report agents who are instructing them?

      I could not find anything about enfranchisement or forfeiture and only 3 short paragraphs about commonhold.

      Comment


        #4
        Eagle - Lord Best's report was targeted towards regulation (with teeth) and transparency.
        The Select Committee Report and Law Commission focused on the areas you mention above.
        The CMA have just closed their own consultation and have received an overwhelming amount of evidence to process.
        On another note- I see Landlords are potentially in for another hammering (controlled rents).

        Comment


          #5
          We shall have to wait and see, my comment was that the FTT could have been given teeth,

          Transparency in theory exists today through the RICS code of practice, many agents are not complying with it, Detecting the connection between persons associated with agents is not easy. The report appears to recognise the difficulty.

          I think that the landlords and agents ability to introduce money making schemes has been underestimated.

          Comment


            #6
            The FTT has always been skewered. It is symptomatic of the deeply embedded flawed area that is leasehold.
            That's why the true champions of leaseholders - LKP - have always been shunned. They asked to be part of the FTT for example, and were refused. There is too much at stake for too many people.
            Shared ownership/Help to Buy schemes have taken it to a whole new level of abuse.

            Comment


              #7
              Michelle - please do not exaggerate, LKP is not the "true champions of leaseholders", your knowledge of the subject seems to be seriously flawed, please carry out some research and study the history.

              Comment


                #8
                Really? That is not my experience. They have fought hard and campaigned hard for many years for leaseholders. I have witnessed many examples if this in the past year.
                What am I missing?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by michelle230 View Post
                  Really? That is not my experience. They have fought hard and campaigned hard for many years for leaseholders. I have witnessed many examples if this in the past year.
                  What am I missing?
                  Your knowledge appears to be superficial, you have frequently raised comments as though they were new issues when the problems have existed for decades. You do not appear to have a sense of priorities.

                  Your comment that freeholders will be eager to sell their portfolios is not supported by any evidence.

                  Which Magazine estimated that leaseholders were being overcharged by £700 million per annum in 2011. The Select Committee noted that the leasehold sector is now larger and that figure is likely to be higher.

                  Freeholders and their agents are not going to give up their share of the cake overnight or anytime soon, the chances are that they will be studying new money making schemes.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Yes. There is a pool of people whose businesses are based on finding loopholes in the law to extract money from the public for no real service. They tent to be very good at keeping just short of criminal prosecution. As in a military situation, an attacker only has to find one weakness, whereas defenders have to envisage all possible attacks.

                    You get hints at this, but generally for one man businesses, even on the letting side of these forums, where you will find people proposing all sorts of schemes to extract money from properties (not least AirBnB based), or attempting to find holes in things like the tenant fees legislation.

                    A lot of businesses these days aren't predicated on having the skills to provide a service with money being secondary, but treat money as primary and just look for ways to obtain it, whilst keeping just within the law (or not so far out that a prosecution is likely).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I have no doubt that there are certain individuals who are employed full time to devise ways of pushing charges to the limit whilst ensuring that it is impossible to prove criminal activity

                      Vague comments about transparency, which cannot be enforced easily if at all and which can be circumvented, are not going to stop overcharging. It seems to be a token effort and there seems to be a general reluctance to tackle the real problem. These reports should follow the money, identify the persons who are benefitting and their connections.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        That's actually the job of most of the head office people in any consumer facing organisation. The difference here is that there is no valid service being provided.

                        For example, supermarkets, and even franchised petrol stations with convenience shops, produce detailed plans of how products are to be arranged on the shelves. Thatt's done to psychologically tempt you into buying more than you intended, and to buy the high profit branded products.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          At least with a supermarket or convenience shop, you have a choice, you can choose to go elsewhere.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I accept that transparency is better than nothing but can anyone explain how it assists a leaseholder if an agent declares that he receives say 5% commission on an insurance policy? A leaseholder is unlikely to be able to prove that the disclosure is incorrect. To have any meaning at all, someone should carry out spot checks to verify that the information is correct. I do not see that contained within the proposals.

                            Does anyone seriously think that an agent is going to admit to receiving 40% to 60% commission?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Carrying out spot checks would require an increase in tax payer spend. No Conservative government is going to sanction that.

                              (As I said elsewhere, I think the country has reached a point where respect for the law is in terminal decline, as a result of not funding pro-active enforcement, to keep taxes low.)

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Request to appeal an FTT decision
                                vmart
                                Hello there

                                I hope someone can help with answers to the following questions:

                                1) Where one has legal grounds to appeal an FTT decision, is there a specific form or do you just write to the court providing grounds and requesting leave to appeal within the time limit?
                                2)...
                                22-09-2019, 13:40 PM
                              • Reply to Request to appeal an FTT decision
                                eagle2
                                The Tribunal lists the legislation which it has considered when making its decision, so an appeal on legal grounds would need to be based on (1) an incorrect interpretation of the legislation which is unlikely if a Judge or legal expert was on the panel (2) other legislation which it has not considered...
                                23-09-2019, 07:23 AM
                              • Reply to Request to appeal an FTT decision
                                eagle2
                                Clerical errors can be corrected by the FTT, so it is worth reading carefully the decision and checking that the figures have been adjusted correctly. Sometimes it will fail to amend a figure or calculate the adjustment incorrectly. In these cases, a simple request to the Tribunal will result in an...
                                22-09-2019, 21:04 PM
                              • Reply to Request to appeal an FTT decision
                                vmart
                                Dear all

                                Thank you....
                                22-09-2019, 17:37 PM
                              • Reply to Request to appeal an FTT decision
                                Macromia
                                The article in the link below describes how you can appeal FTT decisions, including a link to a form that can be used.
                                http://www.flat-living.co.uk/advice/...-an-ftt-appeal


                                'Senior Member' on forums like this (or similar 'titles') are usually based on nothing more than...
                                22-09-2019, 16:18 PM
                              • Property Management bully behaviour
                                boboligogo
                                Hi everyone,

                                I would highly appreciate any contribution to this post.

                                I'll get straight to the point: I am a leaseholder in a block of 8 flats in Leeds. One of the flats belongs to the Freehold owner (Landlord). Ever since I purchased this property we were dealing with a rather...
                                18-09-2019, 18:37 PM
                              • Reply to Property Management bully behaviour
                                eagle2
                                Whatever the merits of the case, the MA could be much more helpful to the leaseholder, who is quite right, if the charge is not permitted in the lease, there is no obligation to pay it. So it would be in the MA's interests to simply refer to the clause which it is relying upon. A leaseholder has the...
                                22-09-2019, 16:14 PM
                              • Reply to Request to appeal an FTT decision
                                eagle2
                                You need permission from the FTT in order to appeal against a decision and you should contact the FTT stating your grounds for appeal. The FTT will then either consent to or deny the appeal. There would be a fee payable to the Upper Tribunal, details of which would be sent to you if the appeal is allowed....
                                22-09-2019, 16:03 PM
                              • Reply to Property Management bully behaviour
                                vmart
                                Hello

                                The salient points have been highlighted by others above. I would suggest your next step is to follow Scott22's advice and contact LEASE for free advice providing them with a copy of your lease.

                                It is highly likely the Managing Agent (MA) is within their rights to charge...
                                22-09-2019, 14:01 PM
                              • Shared outside tap
                                Baradavies
                                I live in a first floor flat, with a strip of garden at the rear. There is currently an outside tap on the side of the house which is only accessible by one ground floor flat.
                                I want to install an outside tap on the "communal" side of the house, so that we five flats who don't have direct...
                                21-09-2019, 09:45 AM
                              Working...
                              X