Ousting failing RTM co

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • desamax
    replied
    Surely the argument should be they had no rights to form one?
    if my memory serves me they could only have formed an RTA.

    Leave a comment:


  • Section20z
    replied
    Indeed, but there already is an RTM so back to the original question. How do I oust them ?

    Leave a comment:


  • desamax
    replied
    if the commercial area takes up more than 25% total Floor area...

    below taken from this website
    https://www.bradysolicitors.com/brad...ght-to-manage/



    This is a key criteria for RTM and one that isn’t always easy to assess. If the commercial / residential split isn’t clear, you may need to get expert opinion on the internal floor area.

    When calculating the commercial percentage, an assessor will include any dividing walls to the commercial unit and also any commercial car parking spaces. Balconies however will not be included.

    Whilst the burden of proof rests with the landlord, if he can provide evidence that there is at least 26% commercial tenancy, the RTM will not be possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Section20z
    replied
    Thanks, I will contact companies house breaches and see if they will put any pressure on.
    The shop lessee and one other are also concerned about the condition and long term impact so might be persuaded to join me in becoming directors.
    The commercial part is way more than 25%.

    Leave a comment:


  • desamax
    replied
    As it’s a mixed use building, I take it the commercial element is less that 25 % of floor area?

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    Even if you are not a member, they must provide you with the list of members. If you are a member, you can inspect it free of charge. If not there is a small charge they can make for inspection. You need to make the request in the right way. They can only refuse by obtaining a court order, which they wouldn't get and the penny pinching lessees wouldn't want to pay for. There is a charge for everyone if you want them to supply copies, but it is not very large, in the scheme of things.

    If you can document an invalid refusal, it would be worth contacting the breaches team at Companies House, to see if they can remind the director of the law.

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    I don't think http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...agraph/26/made allows a valid application to be refused.

    Also the quorum for directors' meetings has to be at least two.

    However, in this case, as the RTM is currently the responsible person for H&S, it might be worth considering trying to get enforcement action taken against the company for the breaches. Unfortunately, government austerity may mean that this is more difficult than it ought to be.

    Although the freeholder could become a director, even without being a member, RTMs are normally set up because of dislike of freeholder, so they are unlikely to give a freeholder more than the minimum power.

    You could also try to convince the other lessees that there is a point where being a slum affects the value of their property (although my experience is that is way beyond the point where owner occupiers would be seriously concerned.

    Leave a comment:


  • Section20z
    replied
    Thanks #vsmart , I think the RTM could be invalid for a number of reasons, I have requested certain information from the RTM and been ignored so might have to go to my Solicitor.
    (I think there should be 6 members including me but they won't provide that info either !)
    Thanks for input - all useful.

    Leave a comment:


  • vmart
    replied
    Dear Section 20z

    When the RTM was acquired the RTM company should have invited the landlord to become a member. I suggest, if possible, you make enquiries with the former freeholder and find out if this was done. If not, and you can prove it, the RTM might be invalid (you would need legal advice).

    I am not sure if a landlord can apply to be a member of the RTM further along the line but it would be worth checking.

    The problem is if you were a member you will be out voted as you will only have one vote. Though I am not clear how many members of the RTM there are as you refer to one director; and lessees that are not motivated.

    Even if you could apply to appoint a manager I would not recommend this. The route does not give you any control either. Control passes to the FTT appointed manager and costs can significantly increase though usually for leaseholders.

    The RTM does have a duty to inform you in relation to certain matters for example consents. The leases still need to be complied with too.
    You still retain responsibility for landlord’s covenants outside of day-to-day management. You also retain the right to forfeiture and only you can take action.

    So find out exactly what information a freeholder is entitled to and write to the RTM accordingly. If there are issues with individual flats in relation to breaches of lease, this might provide a route to you applying pressure.

    Incidentally non-residential parts of the building are not included in RTM.

    Overall, I would suggest you speak with a solicitor because this is a complex area now that there is an RTM in place. Some solicitors are willing to provide some information before you instruct them and start incurring fees.

    (Ground rent is still yours to demand and collect)

    Leave a comment:


  • Section20z
    started a topic Ousting failing RTM co

    Ousting failing RTM co

    As a Freeholder of a property (converted listed building 4 flats 1 shop) that I purchased with an RTM Co in place , I am having serious issues with the single director of the RTM which is failing to maintain the property or comply with H&S legislation, he has also refused to allow me to be a member of the company. The other Lessees don't help much as they are all absent landlords happy to pay no service charge while the building disintegrates.
    Advice from the official government supported website (lease-advice) is that a Landlord can apply to FTT to oust a failing RTM using the "appoint a manager" process, but the FTT are telling me only a lessee can apply.
    Anyone had any experience in similar situation or suggestions ??

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • First Tier Tribunal - who is the respondent if RTM
    by Sahar
    Hi


    I want to get the FTT hearing in relation to section 20 work charges that our MA issued recently.
    Not only MA selected a contractor where they are also a director, the quote for works is 50% higher that the cheapest quote obtained, but they also added 10%+VAT "management...
    26-02-2020, 20:42 PM
  • Reply to First Tier Tribunal - who is the respondent if RTM
    by MrSoffit
    Sahar The RTMC is the respondent landlord in this instance. Be advised that adding a managing fee to a s20 job is standard, and 10% does not seem unduly unreasonable. As for the relative merits of quotes, the issue with s20 is that you have to prove you have been prejudiced while at the same time cannot...
    27-02-2020, 07:43 AM
  • Reply to Variation of lease
    by Macromia
    If the ground rent in your lease doubled every 20 years the following ground rent would be due:
    £150 per year from 2012 to 2031 (compared to ten years of £150 / ten of £225)
    £300 per year from 2032 to 2051 (compared to 10x £337.50 / 10x £506.25)
    £600 per year from 2052 to...
    27-02-2020, 07:15 AM
  • Variation of lease
    by scampicat
    I own a flat with a lease of 125 years starting from 2012. The ground rent is at present £150 pa, but increases as follows every ten years: £225... .£337.50.... 506.25.... 759.38.... 1139.06.... 1708.59.... 2562.89 ....3844.34. There are no more increases after eighty years. I am considering a variation...
    25-02-2020, 08:57 AM
  • Reply to First Tier Tribunal - who is the respondent if RTM
    by ATC
    the respondent must surely be the party for whom the managing agent is acting; I suppose the MA could be co-respondents. Please do spread the word regarding the wrongdoings of your RTM company. Whilst there are people around such as Sebastian Kelly promoting the virtues of RTM and self management, it...
    27-02-2020, 00:54 AM
  • Long Leaseholder's Tenants Refusing Access
    by divadee
    So after a long long wait to get all the money for some works on the property all done with Section 20 notices. The work commenced on Monday this week. Now work needed to be completed in 3 flats. The work was done in our flat the past few days. The flat opposite us upstairs has since the section 20...
    26-02-2020, 20:19 PM
  • calling EGM - which is up to date RTM Companies (Model Articles) Regulations
    by Sahar
    hello,

    I tried calling an EGM (with the support of required number of leaseholders > 5% ) but got a reply from a MA that directors (1 of them being MA themselves, another one their friend) have reviewed and my request is declined.

    Looking for an info which is the current...
    07-02-2020, 20:14 PM
  • Reply to calling EGM - which is up to date RTM Companies (Model Articles) Regulations
    by Sahar
    thanks MrSoffit, asked them again clarifying that I am after the register as defined in s113, will see what the response is to that.

    On another subject, I want to get FTT hearing in relation to section 20 works charges. Not only MA selected a contractor where they are also a director, the...
    26-02-2020, 17:41 PM
  • RTM hand over costs from outgoing managing agent
    by Cwhit2020
    Hi,

    We have taken over the RTM of our small block at the end of January. The only communication we have had so far from the outgoing managing agent has been to send a statement to the company asking for an outstanding amount of around £1000 from a balance of £3000, £2000 of which has...
    26-02-2020, 14:27 PM
  • Reply to RTM hand over costs from outgoing managing agent
    by MrSoffit
    A laudable sentiment if rather late, what? Your new RTMC is starting with a woeful lack of knowledge in a shark infested sea.

    An RTMC starts with a clean slate. It is not a sum of the leaseholders who formed it. It is an indepenedent legal entity, a wonder to behold. It should be cherished...
    26-02-2020, 17:31 PM
Working...
X