Right to Manage - Process Questions

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Right to Manage - Process Questions

    Hello forum,

    Very brief summary of my situation. I own a flat (110 years left on the lease) in a big old Victorian house in London. 11 flats in total, all leasehold. Fairly standard stuff.

    The guy who owns the freehold also does the property management via his own company. I'll call him Mr Freeholder.

    There is a limited company already in existence which has 11 shares (each leaseholder owns one share). The secretary and sole director of this company is Mr Freeholder.

    The property management service Mr Freeholder provides is terrible. Having spoken informally to most of the other leaseholders, there's a general view that the situation is unsatisfactory and that we'd like to use the "right to manage" framework to get rid of him and manage the property ourselves. We would need to appoint a new director (or directors), which I'd be happy to do to get things going.

    Can anyone advise what the process would be for removing Mr Freeholder and appointing new director(s)? Is it a case of arranging a shareholders' meeting and having various shows of hands? Mr Freeholder is a director but not a shareholder, so is he entitled to attend any shareholders' meeting?

    A particular problem is that 8 of the 11 leaseholders don't live in the building - they've bought the flats as BTL investments and they themselves are scattered far and wide. So getting 6 people in one place at one time might be difficult. Is there a way of taking a vote "remotely"?

    I'm going to need to brush up on company law at some point I think...I believe Mr Freeholder is a qualified company secretary so he will no doubt know these procedures in and out, but I don't want to approach him at this stage.

    Thanks
    A

    #2
    Exercising RTM is not a sensible idea when you already have an RMC, as you do. If you are not satisfied with the management call a general meeting an appoint additional directors, or even remove the freeholder s director. I assume the company articles, at ,east, allow any leaseholder to be a director, and do not give the freeholder a built in majority.

    (RTM does change the regime for approvals, but that doesn't seem to be your issue.)

    Your big problem will be finding people willing and able to be directors.

    Comment


      #3
      Thank you. Hmmm...RTM...RMC...ok...so the RTM process isn't necessary here?

      I'd be happy to act as a director myself. Would we need more than 1 director?

      As I understand it (from my limited understanding of articles, etc.) it's one share, one vote - and the leaseholders own all the shares so it's one vote per leaseholder and none (?) for Mr Freeholder.

      If I called a general meeting, what if a majority (6+ from 11) can't attend (eg owner of flat next door is in Sydney)? Does that matter?

      Assuming we're able to make this change, can the new board (which might just be me) simply inform Mr Freeholder than his property management services are no longer required? Would the RMC have the right to instruct Mr Freeholder to hand over all the relevant info to allow a smooth transfer (eg. all existing contracts for cleaning, refuse collection, insurance, etc.)?

      A

      Comment


        #4
        If you actually had an RTM, the freeholder would also have a vote, so your current arrangement gives you more power.

        A shareholder who cannot attend a meeting can appoint a proxy. It is a criminal offence for the calling notice for the meeting not to point this out.

        The majority required is of those attending in person, or by proxy, not of all the shareholders.

        You will have to follow the contract terms for terminating the contract with the managing agent.

        The freeholder only holds the information on behalf of the company; they are somewhat akin to an employee of the company, so they can be instructed to hand it over.

        Companies produce better decisions if they have more than one director. Five is often considered optimum. RTMs need at least two, as do older companies of all types. You should check the company articles.

        (I think that actual creation of an RTM might terminate the managing agent contract prematurely, but I see no point in doing it just for that.)


        Comment


          #5
          Thank you.

          Re: number of directors. I may be able to persuade some other leaseholders to do this (or not!). Articles of RMC say "number of directors may be any number not exceeding the number of issued shares" ie any number from 1 to 11. So having 1 director seems to be permissible but admittedly not ideal.

          How do I make s/h meeting happen? Do I simply ask the board (ie Mr F) to call one?

          (forgive my very noddy questions - this is all new to me)

          A






          Comment


            #6
            Companies Act 2006 section 303. If they fail to call it, proceed with the following sections.

            You need 28 days notice for any motion to remove an existing director.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Freeholders breach of the lease
              surreygirl
              We had a surveyor in last year in April 2018 which said that the outside render was now porous and needed to be repaired as a matter of urgency and should be a priority. At a meeting they voted to wait for a year until people had saved up the money and also they needed to have an asbestos test done....
              16-06-2019, 09:39 AM
            • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
              surreygirl
              They are in a position. One is worth a god few million, one is a well known artist, the others are all in well paid jobs and there are two of them whilst there is only one of me!...
              19-06-2019, 12:50 PM
            • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
              surreygirl
              No there is no allowance for a reserve fund. However I have always put away a few 100 a month just in case of any disaster. The other leasses are all high earners, they will not have a problem rustling up the money. If they had got on with it in 2011 it would have been a lot cheaper, but they didnt....
              19-06-2019, 12:48 PM
            • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
              surreygirl
              Yes I have had the flat for 30 years, it it was in 2011 that the problems of penetrating damp became known, but the people in charge at the time chose to ignore it. I even got in my own surveyor but they were immune to what he said. Finally I insisted on a surveyor checking the whole building and he...
              19-06-2019, 12:45 PM
            • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
              surreygirl
              There is nothing in the lease in respect of emergency repairs....
              19-06-2019, 12:41 PM
            • Approximate Cost Managing Agent
              scot22
              Not sure if correct title but looking for someone to manage finances and lease building responsibilities. Victorian 12 dwellings building in Cumbris.
              What would an average monthly charge per dwelling be ? Would it be usual to charge for extras such as getting quoted for work ?
              Any advice...
              13-06-2019, 11:12 AM
            • Reply to Approximate Cost Managing Agent
              scot22
              What distance from the property could be considered local ?
              19-06-2019, 10:39 AM
            • Periodic tenancy and transfer fees
              vmart
              We are considering renting out a property and creating a periodic tenancy rather than AST from the start. However, we are concerned that we will need to pay the freeholder £25 per month transfer fee (per lease) required when we underlet as the tenancy will, in effect, be renewed on a monthly basis....
              18-06-2019, 08:12 AM
            • Reply to Periodic tenancy and transfer fees
              Lawcruncher
              "However, we are concerned that we will need to pay the freeholder £25 per month transfer fee (per lease) required when we underlet as the tenancy will, in effect, be renewed on a monthly basis."

              A periodic tenancy is a single tenancy not a series of tenancies. You only have...
              19-06-2019, 09:14 AM
            • Sinking fund breach of covennat?
              Stacker
              The level of the sinking fund has never been agreed by the managing agent or the Directors at any AGM in respect of the accounting years ending December 2016 2017 2018 and 2019 as required by the Deeds of Covenant.
              THE FIFTH SCHEDULE
              10. To set aside(which setting aside shall be for...
              16-06-2019, 19:27 PM
            Working...
            X