Old Management Company ignoring new RTM company?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Old Management Company ignoring new RTM company?

    Afternoon guys

    We've had a pretty hard fought RTM battle over the last year or two, which appears to be over. Our old management company has instructed our cleaners to stop cleaning the property from 1st May 2019, which co-incides roughly with when the deadline for handover was.

    Unfortunately our new RTM company, who'll be taking over teh management, have not received any kind of response out of them, for the last few months. And with a week to go before handover, we've still seen nothing.

    What can a company do here when they're not provided with the information they need for handover?

    #2
    If the managing agent is ARMA or RICS accredited, you could threaten to lodge a complaint with them for their failure to pass on the management information.

    I would be watchful also that the existing freeholder/managing agent transfers every penny that is in the service charge pot to your RTM Co. I know of one case where 100K 'disappeared' and the leaseholders were told that there was nothing that could be done to recover the money. In that case, the original freeholder transferred the freehold of a block of flats to an associated company (minus the 100K reserve fund) dissolved the first company which had been the original freeholder and then resigned from the associated company ....

    Comment


      #3
      Contact the local Magistrates Court and ask Court Manager if your RTM company can apply for Court Order to compel handover.

      Comment


        #4
        I would have thought that would have to be done as a Crown Court injunction.

        Comment


          #5
          My Understanding is :

          The Magistrates Court deals with summary offences ( least serious type offence )

          The Crown Court deals with indictable offences ( serious type offences )


          So for handover of service charge information it is better to enter a claim at the Magistrates Court.

          Comment


            #6
            I should have said County Court, not Crown Court.

            The point here is that this requires a civil court injunction not criminal court involvement.

            Summary in practice means a criminal offence without the right to a jury trial.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks guys. Our MP intervened and they finally came back with a handover date at 1st May - three working days time.

              Absolute pisstake.

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                cday356
                Hello all,

                I would be grateful for some views on the following situation. We are a freeholder, and have a non-resident leaseholder who has been sub-letting his flat for more than a decade. We took over the freehold about 6 years ago. It has since come to our attention that the leaseholder...
                16-06-2019, 04:23 AM
              • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                Lawcruncher
                I am not aware of any ruling which says that a covenant to pay rent is excluded from a requirement for an undertenant to observe the head lease covenants.The fact that the covenant to pay rent is often excluded suggests, but does not confirm, that it would be included.

                Under the law of...
                17-06-2019, 00:51 AM
              • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                cday356
                Hi Lawcruncher,

                Thank you greatly for your constructive comments, you have given me a lot to think about.

                In your view, does the sub-letting clause in our lease indeed give us the right to ask the sub-tenant to be liable for observing even the covenants to pay rent and service...
                16-06-2019, 22:54 PM
              • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                Lawcruncher
                The wording of any clause allowing inspection cannot be taken literally, It is implicit that the right must be exercised reasonably. I think the point probably comes when the course of action would be regarded as wholly unreasonable and certainly when it amounts to what would be harassment or some other...
                16-06-2019, 20:24 PM
              • Freeholders breach of the lease
                surreygirl
                We had a surveyor in last year in April 2018 which said that the outside render was now porous and needed to be repaired as a matter of urgency and should be a priority. At a meeting they voted to wait for a year until people had saved up the money and also they needed to have an asbestos test done....
                16-06-2019, 09:39 AM
              • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
                leaseholder64
                No freeholder can get £20k from all the normal leaseholders. I imagine 10-20% would be in financial crisis for just a £500 excess. I don't think there is any reasonable hope of getting the funds together by next year either, unless leaseholders are put in a position where several have to sell up...
                16-06-2019, 20:16 PM
              • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                Lawcruncher
                Concentrating on underletting:

                The requirement to obtain a deed in the case of long residential leases is comparatively recent. It was always much more prevalent in commercial leases, the requirement usually being to enter into the covenant in the licence to underlet. The reason is because...
                16-06-2019, 20:03 PM
              • Sinking fund breach of covennat?
                Stacker
                The level of the sinking fund has never been agreed by the managing agent or the Directors at any AGM in respect of the accounting years ending December 2016 2017 2018 and 2019 as required by the Deeds of Covenant.
                THE FIFTH SCHEDULE
                10. To set aside(which setting aside shall be for...
                16-06-2019, 19:27 PM
              • Reply to Sinking fund breach of covennat?
                leaseholder64
                Directors should be making such decisions at board meetings, not at AGMs!

                The clause appears to an enabling one, not a mandating one.

                Given current interest rates the leaseholders are probably in a better financial position not having a trust fund. I happen to think that enough...
                16-06-2019, 20:01 PM
              • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
                scot22
                I agree with your sentiments. Unfortunately what is legal sometimes is conflict with commonsense and justice.
                Are you required to have approval before starting work ?
                Unless you can tick the boxes you may well have problems.
                16-06-2019, 19:55 PM
              Working...
              X