Service charge accounts - does the lease override the law re timescale?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Service charge accounts - does the lease override the law re timescale?

    I’m troubled by the late/delayed provision of annual service charge accounts by my managing agents.

    They usually only arrive around 5½ months after the end of the service charge financial year (23rd June).

    Inspecting selected invoices in, say, January for an accounting year that started around 18 months previously is less than satisfactory, especially when queries on what the agents might regard as ‘ancient history’ arise.

    And it's too late to receive a credit for the last year's under-spend in the half-year service charge on-account demand.

    When in, say, July I make a request to see the accounts, they effectively fob me off with s.21 L&TA 1985 (which only requires a ‘written summary of costs’ to be provided on the later of one month after a request or six months after 23rd June).

    But I’ve recently had a closer look at the lease and one of the clauses requires the ‘fair summary of annual costs’ to be provided “as soon as practicable after the end of each accounting period”.

    Given that the accounts are maintained efficiently throughout the year by the managing agents’ centralised finance team [annual spend for 36 flats = c.£55k] and their accountants are nearby, I’d have thought that it would be perfectly practicable for the accounts to be prepared, signed off and delivered some time in July or August.

    What I’m not sure about, though, is whether this provision of the lease actually supersedes/overrides the less onerous one of the statute.

    And, if it does, how could I actually see that it was enforced if the managing agents (and their accountants) decided to simply continue to drag their feet as they have always done?

    Going to the FTT would seem to be a heavy-handed and expensive last-resort option.

    Any guidance would be much appreciated.

    Thank you.

    If there was anything to the contrary contained within the lease, the lease would take precedence. Otherwise, the landlord must inform leaseholders of expenditure within 18 months of it being incurred therefore the service charge accounts should be issued within 6 months of the year end.



      If you are receiving Service Charge accounts within 6 months of the yearend then best practice is being observed.


        Paragraph 2.5 is the relevant section of Tech03/11


          The problem with the lease is that it doesn't specify a concrete figure and six months may well be as soon as practicable. I presume the legislation chose six months because they thought that it might be too onerous to specify a shorter time.

          I don't know why, but most small businesses don't submit accounts until almost the 9 month deadline, however, I don't think that is primarily to hide information.

          Because the guidelines call for accruals accounts, some of the information needed to do them accurately may not be in until the next quarterly bills arrive.


            Most service charge accounts are small and straight forward and there is no reason why they could not be completed within one month after the year end. There are advantages of finalising a service charge year as soon as possible rather than having two years open at the same time.


              I believe some agents actually operate online portals allowing scans of invoices to be seen almost on the day that they arrive.

              I guess the reason the law is the way it is is that it is pre-WWW, so providing actual invoices was relatively onerous, and the assumption was that most people would be satisfied by the summary. producing which would be best practice, anyway.

              However, in practice, failing to provide accounts soon after the year end is only going to be useful as something to also be taken into consideration when appointing a manager. Even the criminal sanctions after six months are never enforced.


                I agree that MA’s should post invoices online. The summary of the accounts is better than nothing but only slightly. The accountant’s report is meaningless, it effectively says we check a small sample, the chances are we are not going to spot any errors, we agreed the bank balance at the year end but it could be incorrect for the remaining 364 days.


                  Originally posted by eagle2 View Post
                  Paragraph 2.5 is the relevant section of Tech03/11
                  Thanks, yes.

                  Looking at the guidance in that paragraph, do you think it would be better not to request a summary of costs "in accordance with s21, LTA 1985" but rather to forget about the Act and specifically request the summary/accounts "in accordance with clause [x(x)] of the lease" so that they can't rely on the longer, statutory allowance of six months?

                  It does sound like the lease is actually effectively requiring them to go beyond the six-month 'best practice' and provide the accounts much sooner - as long as that's 'practicable', which in this more digital day and age, it surely is.

                  Is that a fair reading, do you think?



                    The s21 summary of relevant costs is not worth requesting, so I would definitely ask for the accounts in accordance with the lease and I would ask to inspect the supporting documents. I would agree that "as soon as practicable" should mean earlier than 6 months and it is certainly possible, If the MA wishes to be difficult, he can say that 6 months is "as soon as practicable" and the last thing that you want is to argue the point in front of the FTT.


                      Unfortunately, I think that you are going to have to accept service charge accounts being produced within sixth months of the end of the service charge year.
                      Although it should perhaps be possible for the accounts to be produced quicker, I think that it would be very easy for the freeholder/managing agent to convince a court or tribunal that they were complying with the clause in the lease. The fact that six months is allowed for "best practice" suggests that it is considered reasonable for it to take that long to finalise the accounts.



                        The relevant paragraph in page18 of the government approved publication " Long Leaseholders" is shown below :

                        The summary should be supplied within one month of the request or within six months of the end of the accounting period covered by the summary,whichever is the later. Where the service charge is payable by the tenants of more than four dwellings, the summary must be certified by a qualified accountant as a fair summary and sufficiently supported by accounts, receipt sand other documents produced to the accountant.


                        This means the certified copy of service charge acounts should be available to leaseholders from month 7 onwards.

                        The managing agent is allowed a 6 months period to get the bookeeping record to an independant accountant firm for doing the records inspection and certify the summary accounts.

                        The Managing agent has to comply to the RICS Residential Managent Code ( issue 3 ) : see page 53



                          Managing agents don't have to comply with the code, although they have to comply with the statute law that underlies the MUST sections.

                          Failing to comply with SHOULD sections can be used to support a request to appoint a manager, but is not illegal.


                            Section 7.12 ( pages 52 and 53 ) in the Management Code give your rights to access service charge account information and give references to the L & T Legislation . The Code requires RICS members as the Managing agent to be "transparent" but the same Code applies to any agent in charge of the service charge account.

                            So when you as leaseholder demand the service charge information, you can quote the relevant section of the L&T Act.


                              No it doesn't. It simply summarises the rights you have under section 21 onwards of the 1985 Landlord and Tenant Act. The right you have comes from that Act, and if the RICS code differs from the relevant Act (previous versions have referenced the wrong year!) the act takes precedence.

                              It is the same principle as that the Highway Code does not create motoring offences, but simply summaries those in the Road Traffic Acts, etc.

                              Both these documents are designed to indicate good practice that should be an adequate defence against mismanagement or careless driving.


                              Latest Activity


                              • Reply to 'Reasonable' ground rent collection charge?
                                by Gordon999
                                Ground rent is payable by leaseholders under the lease. But ground rent collection fee is payable by the freehold company to its own agent.
                                30-05-2020, 14:56 PM
                              • 'Reasonable' ground rent collection charge?
                                by Benzo
                                Hi guys

                                We recently achieved RTM from our underperforming managing agents. We no longer pay our service charge to them. However our old managing agents still represent the freeholder, and so we still pay our ground rent to him via the old managing agents.

                                Following RTM, they've...
                                04-01-2020, 11:32 AM
                              • Reply to 'Reasonable' ground rent collection charge?
                                by Lawcruncher
                                How much is the ground rent?...
                                30-05-2020, 13:14 PM
                              • Reply to 'Reasonable' ground rent collection charge?
                                by Section20z
                                It would be very unusual to implement a charge just for collecting ground rent and it can't include amounts for chasing non-payers, that would definitely be unreasonable.
                                As others have suggested this collection duty can be taken over by the RTM resulting in minimal extra cost.
                                Or, just...
                                30-05-2020, 12:54 PM
                              • Bird droppings
                                by stum
                                Can anyone please give advice...I have a flat in a purose built block,(30 in total) my lease includes a dedicated car space. My problem is that the car space is directly underneath a gable end of the block and at that point is above the second floor, this is the only car space that has this problem....
                                23-05-2020, 10:14 AM
                              • Reply to Bird droppings
                                by stum
                                cheers just have to pay up myself as usual.........learned my lesson buying a leasehold flat in the UK, esp added to the costs and bad management, is the cost of lease extensions, or loose money on the property as well.
                                30-05-2020, 11:40 AM
                              • Reply to 'Reasonable' ground rent collection charge?
                                by Benzo
                                Hi guys

                                I've confirmed that our MA IS allowed (by the terms of the lease) to charge residents a ground rent collection fee. However I'm still not clear what a 'reasonable' fee would be. The googling I've done suggests about 10% of total is appropriate - does that sound about right? Is there...
                                30-05-2020, 11:16 AM
                              • Reply to Flat Roof used as fire escape and right of way
                                by scot22
                                It seems to me the core question is the safety of the people who have this as their only fire escape route. They MUST have one. Stop looking for ways to avoid the consequences of your mistake.
                                Discuss any possible solutions that they would accept.
                                The only way to avoid possible court action...
                                30-05-2020, 09:34 AM
                              • Flat Roof used as fire escape and right of way
                                by RichardCardiff
                                I am the Freeholder of a property and the property has an single story extension which has a flat roof. The lease holder of the flat above had the lease amended before I purchased it so that he has the right of use of the flat roof. I converted the ground floor of the property and added a basement....
                                29-05-2020, 18:14 PM
                              • Reply to Flat Roof used as fire escape and right of way
                                by Section20z
                                As Andrew Dod says above you need to remove your modifications pronto. Why would you think you had any rights to use an area to which someone else had sole access with a Deed of Variation giving them rights.
                                You can't blame the planning dept.
                                30-05-2020, 09:05 AM