freehold want leaseholders to remove any locks on internal doors of flats

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    freehold want leaseholders to remove any locks on internal doors of flats


    1.All flats will be inspected once every 5 years, or more frequently, as considered necessary, if there are legitimate concerns raised. The lease conveys that right of reasonable notice of inspection.
    2. No locks are to be placed on any room door (bathrooms & balcony doors, excluded), for health & safety reasons and any locks on those doors to be removed and all repairs made good. Comment/ question: "who has locks on their bedroom and lounge doors?”
    3. An independent assessor is to inspect each and every flat.

    4. A 30 day notice to be issued for non compliance and a surcharge, or invoice to be placed to the individual leaseholder’s service charge, or separate invoice to be made for re-inspection.

    We are ok with the inspection, though not regularly but almost every leaseholder feel strange of removing internal locks. People do install for different reasons.

    I was wondering from legal prospective, does the freeholder have the right to enforce such a rule?

    Many thx!

    #2
    What's that an extract from, the lease itself?
    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

    Comment


      #3
      I am not sure but I think it is related to the lease.

      Comment


        #4
        That matters.
        Related to the lease isn't a "thing".

        The terms of the lease are probably enforceable (however odd), rules from (say) the buildings management committee may not have the same force.
        When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
        Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

        Comment


          #5
          It is not on my lease. Now the director want to put it as a rule.

          Comment


            #6
            My suspicion is that the clause is one requiring compliance with local and national regulations, however, if there is no such clause, creating an enforceable rule would require a clause allowing for rules to be created.

            Whilst some of my childhood houses had, token, two lever locks on internal doors, the only reasonable reason I can see would be using the flat as an HMO (or brothel)

            The management would not be responsible for own goal fire safety issues in an individual flat, only for ones where actions in one flat could affect the safety of others. In any case, locks which used a thumb turn on the inside are likely to be considered acceptable even for the safety of the occupiers.

            Any surcharge would be an administration charge, not a service charge.

            You should ask to see the fire risk assessment, as I suspect this originates from there.

            Comment


              #7
              I suspect it's so that people don't let out rooms individually in defiance of the lease.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by tiantian View Post
                It is not on my lease. Now the director want to put it as a rule.
                In which case, there will either be a process in place to impose new rules, or one will have to be created.
                The management committee will have procedures that they have to follow.

                It might be helpful to enquire what health and safety concerns prompted the issue.
                You can then decide if you share them.

                Regardling the inspections, if the lease already allows for inspections with notice, there is no need for there to be any decision about frequency (other than as a broad policy) and no need for there to be any increased frequency associated with legitimate concerns raised.

                What makes a concern "legitimate"?
                Why on earth might an urgent inspection be necessary if there are no legitimate concerns raised? That's just legalistic sounding nonsense.

                When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Reply to Tracing Freeholder
                  by cjramona
                  sadly not no. She’s freeholder in name only really. We insure and maintain the property ourselves. I’ve now tasked a company to try and trace her - she may have passed away I guess as she bought the fteehold in 1986. I renewed the lease in 2010 so it’s fine until 2155!...
                  24-09-2020, 08:18 AM
                • Tracing Freeholder
                  by cjramona
                  Hi, I am new to the forum and sorry for jumping in but cannot find an answer that helps through the search function. I accepted an offer on my leasehold flat 2 months ago and I thought was close to exchange but the buyers solicitors are asking for my freeholder details. I renewed the lease in 2010...
                  22-09-2020, 13:06 PM
                • Reply to S168
                  by sgclacy
                  When you make the application under Section 168 (4) the Tribunal will request that you notify any mortgagee who has an interest in the flat to which you are taking action against.

                  Needless to say the mortgagee will take the matter very seriously indeed and will appoint solicitors to protect...
                  24-09-2020, 07:22 AM
                • S168
                  by Anna1985
                  How crazy would it be to apply to the tribunal as litigant in person to ask them to determine a breach of lease re property disrepair ( the responsibility is on leaseholders, not freeholder) ?

                  Opinions?
                  Thanks...
                  25-08-2019, 18:30 PM
                • Responsibility of window frames
                  by charlie8899
                  Hello - I hope someone can help. I own a new build flat and have a faulty window that needs replacing. This will be quite costly and requires erecting scaffolding. I was surprised to hear from the building management company that windows are the responsibility of the leaseholder. This doesn't seem right...
                  23-09-2020, 08:05 AM
                • Reply to Responsibility of window frames
                  by charlie8899
                  Thanks for all your replies. One last comment, would the fact the plan on my lease clearly excludes the windows as part of my demise be a factor? (see attached). The lease also states that service charge is to cover "the structure and exterior of the Building". Wouldn't windows be considered...
                  24-09-2020, 07:00 AM
                • Reply to S168
                  by Anna1985
                  I think I would be soon, although the application would be made in joint freeholder names
                  23-09-2020, 18:58 PM
                • Reply to Responsibility of window frames
                  by Anna1985
                  Your windows should be covered by Fensa for 10 years, the window installer is under obligation to get them fixed Once Fensa confirms it is their cost. Oh the miracles that could happen when the installer knows they are responsible for all associated costs good luvk
                  23-09-2020, 18:56 PM
                • RTM Company secretary
                  by Andrew Clark
                  We wish to change the RTM Company Secretary from our legacy managing agent to our new managing agent, the legacy agent will not complete the online authentication code until he is paid what he says he is owed. Thoughts on ways around this
                  23-09-2020, 08:02 AM
                • Reply to RTM Company secretary
                  by scot22
                  Is he owed money ? Ask him for detailed proof.

                  Pay him ?
                  23-09-2020, 17:40 PM
                Working...
                X