Musical instrument covenant question, please help!

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Musical instrument covenant question, please help!

    Hi experts,

    We're buying a leasehold flat
    I play cello (never after 8pm) -

    One proposed lease Regulation for a flat we're buying reads as below -

    "Not to sing or dance or play any musical instrument or equipment for making or reproducing sound or to act in such a manner so as to be audible outside the Property so as to cause annoyance to the Flat Tenants or any other occupiers of the Building"

    . Does this mean a) I can't play cello at all, or b) I can't cause annoyance if playing is audible to other tenants?

    Please help as this is a showstopper for us buying this flat. can anything be done about this covenant if the answer is a?


    I suspect that if someone else hears it and makes a complaint it will be classed as an annoyance.

    I can almost guarantee that this will happen, i used to live in a downstairs corner flat and on occasions used to play keyboards not particularly loud. I was served notice due to "the loudness of my organ". This was considered a nuisance however the fact that i could hear the TV's and the tenants moving around in the adjacent flats was not.

    Musical taste is an amazingly diverse thing. I regularly hear young lads playing the latest chart music from terrible sound systems in their cars in the communal car park next to my property which annoys me immensely. If it was Nivana or Rage against the machine i wouldnt have an issue i'd actually like it to be a bit louder, i dont think everyone else would agree though!


      Cellos have a spike that rests on the floor, don't they? Definitely going to treat the neighbours to cello music if you buy that place.


        That seems to rule out TVs and radios barely audible outside the property. Bonkers.
        I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...


          Unless the flat has good sound proofing or you can live without your Cello playing I would consider it a deal breaker.


            The answer is B. It is a common clause in lh flats.


              Word. My reading of the clause is that it's two parts - a) not to make noise that is b) annoying to other residents. Both have to be in play for the clause to be broken. I think you're fine, OP.


                Thanks this makes a lot of sense. We just want to be cautious and make sure Lease regulations therein are fair.
                thanks all for your help


                  Don't underestimate the value of talking to your neighbours either. The Lease is there to provide clarity on covenants to help resolve disputes but it's by far the better option to ensure no disputes occur in the first place. A quick knock at your immediate neighbours to say hello and let them know that you never play after 8pm but if they have sleeping babies or are doing nightwork and need other considerations to feel free to ask - that'll go a long way to ensuring your neighbours never have to look at their lease in the first place. In my experience, it's the feeling that they can't ask you to keep it down that results in complaints to the managing agents.


                    Thank you for the kind advice. Yes we do that, and we'll be doing precisely that.


                    Latest Activity


                    • Secret commissions
                      The issue of freeholders and managing agents fiddling insurance commissions at leaseholders’ expense was raised in the Times earlier this month.

                      Sir Peter, 74, said that secret commissions were part of a broader pattern of mistreatment of leaseholders. “Those receiving cowboy commissions...
                      18-07-2019, 20:27 PM
                    • Reply to Secret commissions
                      In many leases, the wording states the "Lessor has sole right to decided on the insured cover ".

                      The Times dated 5 July 2019 carried the report about secret commission extracted from buildings insurance:

                      " Freeholders and managing agents are overcharging leaseholders...
                      19-07-2019, 18:53 PM
                    • Whose responsibility
                      My understanding is that leaseholders are responsible for what is demised to them. However, in our lease floorboards demised. However, freeholder undertakes repair obligation covenant.
                      Which has precedence.
                      19-07-2019, 14:55 PM
                    • Reply to Whose responsibility
                      This is not exactly easy to follow so any responses you get will be meaningless

                      No that is not a correct understanding

                      demised how exactly?

                      For what?

                      19-07-2019, 18:52 PM
                    • Reply to Secret commissions
                      Let me guess:

                      Asbestos survey, Electrical inspection, health & safety inspection, accountancy... (Usual lucrative nonsense.)...
                      19-07-2019, 18:14 PM
                    • Reply to Secret commissions

                      Regulation of Insurance Activities 9.1 Managers must not advise, arrange or administer insurance or handle claims unless they are authorised to do so under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority. This requirement does not apply...
                      19-07-2019, 18:12 PM
                    • Reply to Secret commissions
                      Can you break down the 52%? Was this for insurance commissions only?...
                      19-07-2019, 18:05 PM
                    • Disputes with present freeholder
                      Hi there,

                      It's really a nightmare if the freeholder is bad enough!

                      When I purchased the property in 2006, the freehold was held by the Council. In August 2007, the Council sold the freehold of the building to a housing association. Major works of the building were planned...
                      15-07-2019, 21:08 PM
                    • Reply to Disputes with present freeholder
                      Somebody has to 'suffer' the costs.
                      If work needs to be done on a building, and the cost will be £10,000 for a leaseholder once the total costs have been shared according to the terms of the lease, but the leaseholders contribution is capped at £5000, the remainder has to come from somewhere...
                      19-07-2019, 16:53 PM
                    • I own the whole building freehold but a management company exists, Who has control?
                      I own the whole buildings freehold and one of the 4 flats.
                      There is a management company which the 4 leaseholders are members but the building is not being managed properly.
                      Items such as repairs and communal areas are in poor condition and the other leaseholders are not very cooperative....
                      16-07-2019, 08:18 AM