Musical instrument covenant question, please help!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Musical instrument covenant question, please help!

    Hi experts,

    We're buying a leasehold flat
    I play cello (never after 8pm) -

    One proposed lease Regulation for a flat we're buying reads as below -

    "Not to sing or dance or play any musical instrument or equipment for making or reproducing sound or to act in such a manner so as to be audible outside the Property so as to cause annoyance to the Flat Tenants or any other occupiers of the Building"

    . Does this mean a) I can't play cello at all, or b) I can't cause annoyance if playing is audible to other tenants?

    Please help as this is a showstopper for us buying this flat. can anything be done about this covenant if the answer is a?

    thanks


    #2
    I suspect that if someone else hears it and makes a complaint it will be classed as an annoyance.

    I can almost guarantee that this will happen, i used to live in a downstairs corner flat and on occasions used to play keyboards not particularly loud. I was served notice due to "the loudness of my organ". This was considered a nuisance however the fact that i could hear the TV's and the tenants moving around in the adjacent flats was not.

    Musical taste is an amazingly diverse thing. I regularly hear young lads playing the latest chart music from terrible sound systems in their cars in the communal car park next to my property which annoys me immensely. If it was Nivana or Rage against the machine i wouldnt have an issue i'd actually like it to be a bit louder, i dont think everyone else would agree though!

    Comment


      #3
      Cellos have a spike that rests on the floor, don't they? Definitely going to treat the neighbours to cello music if you buy that place.

      Comment


        #4
        That seems to rule out TVs and radios barely audible outside the property. Bonkers.
        I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

        Comment


          #5
          Unless the flat has good sound proofing or you can live without your Cello playing I would consider it a deal breaker.

          Comment


            #6
            The answer is B. It is a common clause in lh flats.

            Comment


              #7
              Word. My reading of the clause is that it's two parts - a) not to make noise that is b) annoying to other residents. Both have to be in play for the clause to be broken. I think you're fine, OP.

              Comment


                #8
                Thanks this makes a lot of sense. We just want to be cautious and make sure Lease regulations therein are fair.
                thanks all for your help

                Comment


                  #9
                  Don't underestimate the value of talking to your neighbours either. The Lease is there to provide clarity on covenants to help resolve disputes but it's by far the better option to ensure no disputes occur in the first place. A quick knock at your immediate neighbours to say hello and let them know that you never play after 8pm but if they have sleeping babies or are doing nightwork and need other considerations to feel free to ask - that'll go a long way to ensuring your neighbours never have to look at their lease in the first place. In my experience, it's the feeling that they can't ask you to keep it down that results in complaints to the managing agents.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Thank you for the kind advice. Yes we do that, and we'll be doing precisely that.
                    Best
                    M.

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • RICS surveyor expert opinion
                      scot22
                      Where there has been a difference of view between two surveyors does anyone have experience of using a third independent surveyor to give expert neutral advice ? Hopefully resulting in finding common ground....
                      26-05-2019, 08:50 AM
                    • Dealing with damp
                      scot22
                      It is a 19th century building converted into 10 leasehold flats. Three of the flats wish to tank their walls to deal with damp issues. My research is that this could cause more problems in other parts of the building. Are they allowed to do this without permission ?
                      04-02-2018, 12:59 PM
                    • Reply to Dealing with damp
                      scot22
                      Thanks. It's random stone with rubble infill. Some communal areas experience damp but then dry out. Freeloader wishes to deal with issue by applying modern, breathable barrier externally. One lease holder threatens legal action to stop this work.
                      26-05-2019, 08:45 AM
                    • Reply to Dealing with damp
                      Gordon999
                      Does the 19th Century building have 9in solid brick walls or 11in brick walls with 2in cavity ?

                      Cellar tanking or basement tanking refers to the application of a liquid waterproof coating (tanking slurry) to the walls and floor of a cellar. It is used to treat damp walls by preventing water...
                      25-05-2019, 22:34 PM
                    • Reply to Dealing with damp
                      scot22
                      Thanks for prompt and helpful advice. This has been recommended by a surveyor and freeloader to pay. Don't ask me why but they object to this !
                      25-05-2019, 13:35 PM
                    • Leasehold Deed of Variation for Service Charge
                      Petesam73
                      Hi,

                      I’m the freeholder of a block of flats, and we’ve just agreed (myself and the leaseholders) a change to the service charge percentages. I understand that a Deed of Variation is the best way to enact this given that nothing else is changing. I also understand that a simple amendment...
                      25-05-2019, 10:56 AM
                    • Reply to Leasehold Deed of Variation for Service Charge
                      Petesam73
                      The percentages were set ages ago (late 1990s) and there are no records of what led to that choice (the flats are roughly equal sizes (in sq ft) though the service charge split isn’t). The only clue is that the one currently paying more occupies two floors including the roof space, so maybe someone...
                      25-05-2019, 13:25 PM
                    • Reply to Dealing with damp
                      bluebonnie
                      A 19th century building should probably have lime mortar - which would enable dampness to evaporate rather than penetrate the walls. It's a mistake to replace lime mortar with cement mortar. The freeholder is probably responsible for that mistake.

                      Get a surveyor or a structural engineer...
                      25-05-2019, 12:52 PM
                    • Reply to Dealing with damp
                      scot22
                      Sorry to revive thread. Flats on first and second floor. They want Freeholder to pay , not take on responsibility themselves. Freeholder lease obligation is to repair and maintain. Cement mortar pointing in good condition. Is there anything RMC should do ?
                      25-05-2019, 11:57 AM
                    • Reply to Leasehold Deed of Variation for Service Charge
                      Lawcruncher
                      You can certainly do this without a lawyer. However, like many things, it is easy when you know how and there is always scope for getting it round your neck. Have a go at drawing up something and post it here. At the same time post the exact wording, including numbering, of the clause which sets out...
                      25-05-2019, 11:23 AM
                    Working...
                    X