Bill left over from RTM

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • skidder
    started a topic Bill left over from RTM

    Bill left over from RTM

    Good afternoon all,

    I must thank you all for the previous advice with our RTM. To be honest, so far, it has not been too stressful.

    Now just a quick question please.

    6 months after RTM I have had a fairly large 'professional fee' from a company that my managing agent did not settle before handover. It is not a utility bill.

    Now my first reaction is to just pay it but my question is who is actually liable?

    Many thanks again.

  • eagle2
    replied
    You should check first of all that the sum demanded is a valid charge and that it is payable eg did the managing agent instruct services to be provided by the Company and was the amount authorised? You should then check whether or not you are permitted to use the service charge monies to pay the bill eg is it for a service which may be considered as a service charge under the terms of the lease? Once you are satisfied that the bill was authorised and it is payable and you are authorised to use service charge monies, then you are able to pay the bill.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Lord Best report
    michelle230
    For anyone interested -

    Chapter 6 focus on Leasehold..

    https://www.gov.uk/government/public...g-group-report
    18-07-2019, 12:46 PM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    michelle230
    I have mentioned them I think twice.
    The other times they have been mentioned is in reply to your comments....
    22-07-2019, 12:24 PM
  • MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application
    Benzo
    Hi all

    We applied for RTM in Dec 2017, and then again in June 2018. About a week after our second application, our MA triggered a section 20 major works notification and employed the services of a surveyor to produce a spec. We objected to this and said that it wasn't appropriate to trigger...
    22-07-2019, 08:46 AM
  • Reply to MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application
    eagle2
    Considering your history with the freeholder, I would have thought that you had paid enough already.

    It probably depends on how urgent the works were, could they have been delayed reasonably? Were the costs incurred before or after you objected? If that is your only objection to the costs,...
    22-07-2019, 11:54 AM
  • Reply to MA started Section 20 Major Works proceedings AFTER RTM application
    Benzo
    Quite possible. I'm not quite trying to get out of paying - if this is a reasonable request for payment then I'll most likely pay it - I just want to see if this is a fair request, doesn't feel like it to me but I may be biased ...
    22-07-2019, 11:12 AM
  • Secret commissions
    Stacker
    The issue of freeholders and managing agents fiddling insurance commissions at leaseholders’ expense was raised in the Times earlier this month.

    Sir Peter, 74, said that secret commissions were part of a broader pattern of mistreatment of leaseholders. “Those receiving cowboy commissions...
    18-07-2019, 20:27 PM
  • Reply to Secret commissions
    eagle2
    I accept the distinction and agree that it would be better if there were specific legislation. The new regulator may well make it a requirement for disclosure to be made.

    There is nothing to stop a leaseholder applying now to the freeholder or agent and asking them to comply with the RICS...
    22-07-2019, 11:09 AM
  • Reply to Secret commissions
    leaseholder64
    The RICS guide uses should and must in specific ways. They only time they use must is when there is legislation that requires it. In that case they also include a reference to that legislation.

    There may be the odd mistake, particularly where legislation is on the books but has not been...
    22-07-2019, 10:36 AM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    eagle2
    Michelle – I think that you have advertised the LKP enough times already, please read the forum’s rules. You repeated your error regarding the LKP applying to be represented on the FTT so your explanation does not stand up. My comments relate to your statements and I am more than happy for the readers...
    22-07-2019, 10:26 AM
  • Reply to Lord Best report
    michelle230
    I made an error (meant LEASE- not FTT) through tiredness rather than ignorance and was grateful to Gordon for pointing this out.
    I don't agree that I am " wildly exaggerating" about the huge, prolonged efforts LKP have made in fighting to highlight and effect change and justice for leaseholders....
    22-07-2019, 09:29 AM
Working...
X