transitioning from FTT appointed manager back to RTM

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    transitioning from FTT appointed manager back to RTM

    Hello,

    Would be extremely grateful for help with this from someone with experience and knowledge of RTM companies:

    I am a leaseholder in a large (30) block of flats. Up until 4 years ago the building was under RTM management (for about 10 years), but for the last 4 we have have been under a first tier tribunal appointed manager. To cut a long story short: the building is heritage, has needed a lot of expensive repairs, Section 20s, all extremely costly for leaseholders, high service charge, values of flats plummeted. Lots of hostilities between RTM and leaseholders about how things were being run, mistrust, breakdown of communication.
    The past RTM operated like a closed clique with not much change of members; little power-sharing and was not open to having new people come on board as directors. Also the chair of the board sought to have a lot of power, and does not even reside in this country. (?!). From what I know of RTMs and the ethos behind them - these two things - being exclusive and having a non-residential nor local chair seems to go against the very principle behind the RTM?

    This all created a lot of hostility so the board applied to the FTT and sought money from certain (not all - only the ones who felt supported them) leaseholders to do so.

    Since the FTT manager has taken over there has been a hiatus in the hostilities and we have moved forward with a lot of the repairs. However, now the manager's time is up and they want to hand back to RTM next year. We are fearful that the current manager (the FTT appointed one) is in the pockets of the previous board (who he seems to have been consorting with) and is going to do the easy thing and enable them to slot back into power - without addressing the historical problems. My view and that of many others is that there needs to be a change of directorship if the building is to move forward out of the ghastly situation of before.We are being called to a meeting about this soon. Can anyone comment on this situation and tell me anything about:

    - what the status of the previous RTM would now be (following the FTT period); is it dormant or dissolved?
    - how would the RTM be reformed and how do we appoint new directors?
    - is there anything we can do to ensure that the new board is not composed by a majority of the old members?
    - what should we ask/demand the outgoing manager do to ensure the RTM starts afresh? (he has actually said to me on the phone that he thinks there should be new people on the board) and does he have power over this process?
    - if we are unhappy with the ensuing situation can we go back to the FTT and complain?

    Many thanks
    Poppy H

    #2
    The purpose of an RTM Company is for the leaseholders to run the management of the property and make decisions. In your case, it looks like one or more leaseholders/members are abusing their power and they are not acting in the best interests of the other leaseholders/members. The best solution is for the majority of leaseholders/members to decide at the meeting how to proceed in future, appoint the directors they wish to represent them and decide which managing agent they want to be appointed at the property.

    There is always the right for a leaseholder to apply to the FTT but you should consider it as a last resort and the RTM Company is there for you to make decisions yourselves.

    Comment


      #3
      Apologies I did not address a couple of your questions. You can check the status of the RTM at Companies House, it is probably dormant. It would not be allowed to operate at all if it had been dissolved. Someone (the agent?) is arranging the meeting to decide how the RTM proceeds. If the agent is receptive to new directors being on the board, that appears to be a good sign, there is the opportunity for leaseholders/members to put themselves forward and appoint those who are likely to act in their best interests.


      Comment


        #4
        I would assume the RTM is still there, and with the same directors.

        Changing directors is covered in other recent threads, but basically you simply ensure that enough members of the company are prepared to vote against the current directors, and for your choice of new directors, on a simple majority vote, then request the calling of a general meeting for the purposes of removing the current directors (name them all) and appointing your new directors. It may even be being consulted by the manager. The main difference is that the manager has the ultimate decision, whereas, normally the RTM would override a managing agent.

        I would caution you though, that your new directors need to include people who don't need to be be told how to find out if the company still exists and who the directors are They also need to include people who are familiar with the details of the lease and RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code.

        Comment


          #5
          Thank you both for your timely replies, this is really helpful Yes the company is listed as dormant so I suppose that means everything is still as it was. Yes the agent is arranging the meeting. It's good to know that the manager has ultimate say over the formation of the board, and cannot be overridden by the RTM.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
            I would caution you though, that your new directors need to include people who don't need to be be told how to find out if the company still exists and who the directors are They also need to include people who are familiar with the details of the lease and RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code.
            That comment is completely out of order. There is no point scaring people from acting as directors and allowing an unsatisfactory position to continue. The leaseholders should take back control of the RTM.

            Leaseholders are usually laypersons who cannot be expected to understand all possible relevant sections of Company Law, Landlord & Tenant legislation and the RICS management code of practice. There are useful booklets available free of charge and leaseholders are entitled to receive support from a managing agent.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks eagle2.The current manager advised me similarly - that being a director is doable even for a lay person such as myself, providing one has the right support and advice.

              Comment


                #8
                I hope that you volunteer to become a director and you can learn as you progress like most of us have done over the years and continue to do. It is only when you think that you know everything that you need to stop and take another look.

                Please feel free to come back here if you need any assistance or an alternative opinion.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Thanks, I am thinking about it, but from everything I've read it seems to be a big commitment and lot of responsibility and work and I'm a working mother of a young child so I"m not in the ideal position. I would perhaps rather endorse people that I know would be good on the board and who also do have the time. Have to say though situation here has been so bad that I am a bit put off as to how difficult the politics of RTMs can become and would not want to be on the other end of angry leaseholders and have all that trouble directed my way. (honestly I can see that happening here - it's a funny place this building, with difficult personalities and quirks and some unhealthy alliances etc I wouldn't describe it as a very freindly place

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If you have a good managing agent, who is transparent about the charges and deals properly with complaints and comments, he should shelter the directors from problems with the leaseholders. As a director your standard response to a leaseholder would be to discuss any problem with the agent.

                    There should be little need for the directors to have much involvement. For the size of your property a couple of meetings a year should suffice and those meetings could be dealt with by an exchange of emails if all the directors agree.

                    See how you get on at the meeting anyway. The usual problem is that there is a lack of volunteers which made someone else’s comments on here inappropriate.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I am aware of Companies where directors communicate entirely by email and telephone. That is usually due to the distance between them or it is just convenient to hold meetings in that way but it demonstrates that it can be done and becoming a director does not need to become onerous. Directors at other Companies make a meeting a social event, by arranging coffee and biscuits or wine and cheese.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        One further thought, you may wish to contact other members ahead of the meeting to see if they would be willing to become directors. That way you can decide in advance whether to support them or put your own name forward, Good luck anyway.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          RTM does not prevent you engaging a managing agent as well (in fact it is encouraged I believe). If you are happy with the FTT appointed one, why not keep them on?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            The appointment of a good managing agent is very important and will ease the workload of the directors as suggested above. Ideally the directors would carry out due diligence and consider 2 or 3 different managing agents and seek references from directors at other blocks before appointing an agent.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Have you held your meeting yet? Please return and let us know what you decided.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                Freeholderandleaseholder
                                hello - its a little long, so sorry but please bare with !

                                Hubby and I bought a ground floor maisonette in a block of 4 (there’s 3 blocks in total) the land - all 3 blocks is freehold as well as, a private shared driveway/road leading to the garages at the rear (owned by the 12 owners...
                                19-05-2019, 06:21 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                Freeholderandleaseholder
                                also the management company (all 12 owners collectively) do nothing other than have an accountant.
                                there is no rent, there is no service charge, the only shared area is the private road leading to our garages,
                                the blocks are independent, independant front doors, no communal areas etc,...
                                19-05-2019, 18:06 PM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                Freeholderandleaseholder
                                yes the land was purchased from HM Treasury.
                                yes there is an old lease dated 1964 in the name of the landholder before HMLR took it over. however, the issue for us personally, is not whether our 122 year term is ok, we know it is it is registered we have a copy from HMLR saying our flat has...
                                19-05-2019, 17:58 PM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                leaseholder64
                                It sounds as though, at some point, this property was in bona vacantia ("purchased from HM Treasury"), because the freeholder had ceased to exist.

                                I would have thought the original leases would continue to exist, but I've seen some postings that suggest that is not the case. ...
                                19-05-2019, 10:16 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                Jon66
                                Have you made enquiries to the solicitor who acted for you on the purchase, as the issue should have been pointed out to you during the conveyance. With no lease agreement who decides when the maintenance work that will need doing is carried out? I struggle to see how the terms of a lease can be extended...
                                19-05-2019, 09:49 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                eagle2
                                There should be a lease agreement in respect of the 122 years and that will set out your rights and obligations. All that has happened is that the freeholder has changed. You should be able to obtain a copy of the lease from HMLR. Who is paying for insurance and repairs? What does the management company...
                                19-05-2019, 09:24 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                Lawcruncher
                                Just so I understand this correctly, please confirm the following is correct:

                                You had a lease for x years.
                                You then extended the lease and now have an unexpired term of 122 years.
                                The Land Registry confirm the extension is registered.
                                The document extending the term is...
                                19-05-2019, 09:20 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                Freeholderandleaseholder
                                in response -

                                we bought the place at the going rate 3 years ago (maybe a couple of grand under but nothing out of the ordinary)

                                we are not particularly concerned about the lease term for our own flat, it has 122 years left on it, i have spoken to HMLR and it is registered...
                                19-05-2019, 09:01 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                eagle2
                                I do not understand, you say that you have a lease with 122 years remaining so you should have a lease document which you can supply to a purchaser. If you or a purchaser wish to extend the lease, you would need to apply to the company which now owns the freehold and you would need to agree an amount...
                                19-05-2019, 06:54 AM
                              • Reply to FREEHOLD & LEASEHOLD QUERY PLEASE HELP
                                JK0
                                Presumably you bought at a discount didn't you? Either sell to an investor, or keep the place on as a rental yourselves.
                                19-05-2019, 06:50 AM
                              Working...
                              X