Liability for removal of pipes in my flat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Liability for removal of pipes in my flat

    I own a ground floor leasehold flat in a block of four flats that is currently being converted into a block of six flats by the freeholder. The freeholder owns the two first floor flats, myself and another leaseholder own the two ground floor flats.

    As part of the freeholder’s sky development (removal of current roof and building of two new storeys) they have removed defunct water tanks that sat in the old roof cavity. There are pipes that run from that water tank through my flat and into outside drains.

    They are proposing to cut the existing pipes at the point they go into my ceiling (and presumably put a bung in the top of them). So I will be left with redundant, decaying pipes that are likely to rot and leak over time - as they’re still full of water. I may also encounter problems with rodents and vermin, depending on how well the pipes are sealed on both ends.

    The freeholders are saying it is it is my problem to pay for the removal of the pipes in my flat, should I wish, as the pipes sit in my flat. My lease is a fairly standard lease - I’m responsible for repairs and maintenance in my flat and the whole block is jointly responsible for paying for communal works.

    Can anyone advise on whether I have any recourse to go back to the freeholder (and their appointed managing agent) and contest this? i.e. ask them to either pay in full for the removal of the pipes that wholly served their flat, or share the costs equally.

    thanks

    #2
    We'd have to see your lease, but normally leases only make you responsible for maintaining pipes that exclusively serve your flat.

    Comment


      #3
      Keep it amicable if possible. But the freeholders are being mealy mouthed, which is ratgher unattractive. When we do roof extensions we bend over backwards to be accommodating to the other lessees by for example decorating the common parts at nil charge and doing some external decs while the scaffold is up complimentarily. Presumably they have converted you to direct feed off the mains?
      I'd agree that it is not necessarily the case that the f/h should strip out the pipes but they ought to tap them at the base and drain.

      Comment


        #4
        We were converted onto the mains several years ago. The tanks and their pipes have been redundant since then, and they’re only an issue now because the roof has been taken off to build more flats.

        The attitude of the freeholders has been confrontational from the start. They are trying to make us pay for improvements (we’re not liable for under the terms of our lease) and I’m paying significant legal bills to fight them all the way. This is just the latest hurdle I’m having to overcome.

        They stand to make a consevative £700-800k profit from the build but are coming after me and the other leaseholder for trivial payments - eg skip hire to clear some rubbish in the gardens, dumped by their tenants.

        I tried hard to be amicable at the start but it has gone beyond that now unfortunately.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Variation of lease
          by scampicat
          I own a flat with a lease of 125 years starting from 2012. The ground rent is at present £150 pa, but increases as follows every ten years: £225... .£337.50.... 506.25.... 759.38.... 1139.06.... 1708.59.... 2562.89 ....3844.34. There are no more increases after eighty years. I am considering a variation...
          25-02-2020, 08:57 AM
        • Reply to Variation of lease
          by sgclacy
          A ground rent of £150 per annum increasing by 50% every 10 years until it reaches £3,844.33 with 2 years to go before it makes its first doubling would cost around £7,600 plus 0.33% of the value of the flat to have a statutory lease extension

          One of the difficulties in proposing any...
          13-08-2020, 01:08 AM
        • FH forfeits and sells before 6 months window for relief?
          by Loque
          999yr Long lease commercial, lessee in breach, S146 served, S146 expires without being complied with, FH re-enters and changes locks.

          Now... LH can go to court to claim relief from forfeiture for the remediable breach, usually within 6 months or so. BUT lets say once FH has re-entered he...
          12-08-2020, 13:26 PM
        • Reply to FH forfeits and sells before 6 months window for relief?
          by sgclacy
          Once the Land Registry have closed the title and a new lease granted there is no redress for the lessee seeking relief from forfeiture

          The land registry will write to any party shown in the charges register and the tenant before closing the title - therefore illustrating the need to make...
          13-08-2020, 00:03 AM
        • RTM - Admin Fees Charged by Freeholder
          by chris1544
          We have RTM in place for our two flat building. Recently the other leaseholder put in a request to the RTM company to install an air vent. I duly wrote to the freeholder, notifying them of our intention to grant approval for the works, giving them the statutory 30 days notice.

          They have...
          12-08-2020, 11:04 AM
        • Reply to RTM - Admin Fees Charged by Freeholder
          by Gordon999
          Its in section 98 of Commonhold &Leasehold Reform Act 2002.

          Where a person who is—

          (a)landlord under a long lease of the whole or any part of the premises, or

          (b)party to such a lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant,

          has functions in relation...
          12-08-2020, 22:27 PM
        • Reply to RTM - Admin Fees Charged by Freeholder
          by Lorimer
          There isn't much case law on this but even when an RTM is in place and it is the RTM that is responsible for dealing with consents, I believe the freeholder CAN charge a reasonable admin fee simply for the freeholder's time in reviewing the consent application. This is because the RTM company cannot...
          12-08-2020, 20:33 PM
        • Reply to Late ground rent payment charge & legal fees no warnings
          by Stew
          sounds like a major win
          12-08-2020, 20:22 PM
        • Late ground rent payment charge & legal fees no warnings
          by KingstonBee
          Wonder if you can help... This week I have received a Court Claim form pack with what seems to include a ‘particulars of claim’ and ‘lease’ for ‘outstanding arrears of Ground rent and insurance’.

          Now this is a huge shock as I’ve not received any letters at all, no emails or phone...
          10-06-2020, 20:13 PM
        • Reply to Can I let this freehold indefinately ?
          by ChrisDennison
          Well but who’s to judge that intention? If I as the freeholder only want women, kids and one armed pirates in my block of flats and therefore put a restriction of use to that extent in the lease isn’t that my pretty unambiguous intention?



          Well put. I have a property with...
          12-08-2020, 19:14 PM
        Working...
        X