Signage and Communal Issues

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
    To clarify:

    Are you saying that the sign in question was in position before the first lease was sold?
    So one thing I am not sure about the life of a lease. The date on the copy of the lease I have in my possession is dated Nov 2011. This is between the developer and the person that I bought the property from. I have never seen a copy of the lease that covered the my purchase which would be between the previous owner and I. I have always assumed that the names never changed it is just that fact that you have it in your possession and the completed TR1 form means you own the property. Am I right in this assumption?

    So we know that planing was granted around 2008/2009 and there is a version of street view in Mar 2009 where the property is going through the conversion and you can see it from the pictures. Neither sign is present. By the end of the year or early 2010 we believe the sign was errected.

    Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
    Was the sign erected by someone who no longer has an interest in the property in any way?
    So the sign was erected by the developer. Once the property was converted from a hotel to holiday apartments then we believe the sign was purchased. The developer then sold all the apartments to a group of three investors (who is one of the people who are on the name of my lease) The three investors then ran the development predominantly for holiday lets for 4 - 5 years. They then tried to sell the property as a going concern and when they were unable to they then sold each apartment of separately. Each apartment had to stay with the lettings business for 12 months and then after the last of the three investors sold their apartments the holiday letting business was sold/transferred to one of the new owners. This owner then maintains the sign and it is his business details on the sign.

    So one of the owners has been in contact with the developer to get him to write a letter to state that the clause which states no advertising was not intended for the main signs.

    Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
    Does the lease say (a) no advertising (b) no signs or (c) both?
    Both, it says no signs or notices or advertising outside of the apartment.

    Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
    If the sign is an advert what exactly does it advertise? The flats generally? An agent who deals with most of the flats? Something else?
    So the sign says the following (real details not used)

    Acme House Holiday Apartments

    "Winter lets available at a reduced rate"

    The telephone number of the Holiday Lettings Business that represents 6 of the 10 apartments

    The website address for the above business

    An AA sign and three pictures of various features of the development.


      If the sign was put up by the original landlord then it belongs to the current landlord as it is part of the property (in fact it probably is anyway). No tenant can object to it (a) if it was there before the leases were granted simply, because it was there before the leases were granted (b) if it was erected later, because the tenants at the time agreed either expressly or impliedly by failing to object.

      It is accordingly a matter for the tenants to resolve wearing their landlords' hats. They need to have a meeting and vote on what to do.

      If I was chairing the meeting as an independent I would ask:

      · Does the sign prejudice those who object to it?
      · If the advertising parts of the sign were removed would those who do not object to it lose business?

      The question really is: How much of the letting arises from passing trade?

      Is there a compromise?


        It is unclear from your posts how much involvement the management company has at the present time. You also say that you are a director of the management company and refer to an AGM which implies that it remains active.

        Who has appointed the managing agent? It ought to be the management company and the managing agent ought to accept instructions from the directors of the management company.

        The simplest option would be to call an Extraordinary General Meeting of members and raise the matter on the agenda for all members to decide.

        If you are acting within the terms of the lease and setting the regulations for the smooth running of the property, there would be no need to change the wording of the lease.


        Latest Activity


        • Communal area harassment
          We have a small communal area which is basically an entry and exit point to the flats. One flat owner on the second floor has decided to put lots of plants out in this area and has taken to sitting on the communal stairs daily to drink coffee and let their cat out to roam and have coffee, smoking chats...
          24-08-2019, 12:16 PM
        • Reply to Communal area harassment
          Naughty!! This is the communal area and its for everyone to use...but not as an extension of their flat...and certainly not for them to stand there staring back at me through the windows...and no not paranoid!...who stares at people if they are in their own flat window and then shouting at them from...
          24-08-2019, 13:34 PM
        • Reply to Communal area harassment
          Any time my neighbours' things encroached on my flat, they mysteriously disappeared into my dustbin at 3am just before the dustmen came. (I can't imagine how that happened.)
          24-08-2019, 13:25 PM
        • Reply to Communal area harassment
          Thank you, basically no bins can be put in the area now as its full of plants...I said that no plants can be put under the windows due to health and safety, should we need to get out of the flat we should not need to scrabble over plants! yes definitely a sense of entitlement...we can do what we like...but...
          24-08-2019, 13:20 PM
        • Reply to Communal area harassment
          Expanding into communal areas is a common problem with flat owners, but it is not harassment; it's more an aspect of entitlement syndrome. The freeholder should probably be addressing it, and, if it is compromising an escape route, must address it.

          Funding enforcement may be difficult,...
          24-08-2019, 12:54 PM
        • Significant Penetrating Damp
          I have searched for criteria to decide if a dwelling is uninhabitable. As well as the obvious, it includes significant penetrating damp. As always, difficult to define significant. I would welcome any views on how much would make somewhere uninhabitable. Any case law would be particularly value...
          24-08-2019, 09:27 AM
        • Reply to Significant Penetrating Damp
          You need a surveyor and a professional report. How do you know its penetrating damp? It could be condensation and or both?...
          24-08-2019, 12:43 PM
        • Reply to Significant Penetrating Damp
          So what was the outcome and what did you do to find the cause and what was the solution?...
          24-08-2019, 12:42 PM
        • Reply to Communal area harassment
          They are the only flat owners that do this. I have been checking the lease, the communal area needs to comply with health and safety and the lease. They have basically extended their demise to the communal area and using it as their own but they have also taken to standing and putting plants directly...
          24-08-2019, 12:40 PM
        • Reply to Communal area harassment
          Doesn't sound like harassment to me, unless the looking into the window is intended to intimidate.

          It is likely to be a breach of the lease.

          If this area is enclosed or semi-enclosed, it will be a criminal offence under the Smoke Free Regulations for both the smoker and the...
          24-08-2019, 12:30 PM