Appointment of managing agents

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous Next
    #1

    Appointment of managing agents

    Hi everyone. I wonder if someone could advise me please?
    I own 2 leasehold flats in a converted house. There are only 2 flats in total but I do not own any of the freehold. I have just been informed by the freeholder (a property company based miles away) that they intend to appoint a management agent. I would rather this doesn't happen as I believe it will result in unnecessary expense for me. In the past, the freeholder has been happy for me to do all maintenance myself and not get involved. There is provision in the lease for the freeholder to add a 10% fee to any expenses submitted for payment to the service charge fund. However, I never submit these invoices as the total service charge fund is payable by me. This system has run very well for years. I note that one of the directors of the management company is also the freeholders son. Would i be within my rights to apply for an RTM?
    Many thanks
    Tags: None
    #2
    Yes, as long as you meet the requirements for RTM (which you would seem to, assuming you hold qualifying long leases), it sounds like RTM might be appropriate.

    Alternatively, and possibly a better option in your case, you could consider buying the freehold.

    Comment

      #3
      Hi Macromia.Thanks for your reply. I believe the leases qualify for an RTM. I have also made enquiries before about buying the freehold but their original estimate seemed way too high IMHO. They suggested getting their valuers to value it (which I incidentally would have to pay for apparently) and go from there. My problem is that I would have to pay for the valuation but with no guarantee that they would agree to it and I would have wasted my money!

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by PDW1964 View Post
        My problem is that I would have to pay for the valuation but with no guarantee that they would agree to it and I would have wasted my money!
        There is legislation in place that allows leaseholders to forcibly buy the freehold of buildings in which the have leasehold properties.

        You will have to pay the reasonable costs of the current freeholder, including surveyors and solicitors fees, but you can get a tribunal to determine both the reasonable costs and the price for the freehold if you can't come to an agreement.
        In your case, unless the ground rent is high, or the leases are very short, I wouldn't expect the freehold to be worth a large amount.

        Comment

          #5
          Hi and thanks again. I must admit that I didn't think there was a right to buy the freehold! The ground rents are fairly high in my opinion ie £270pa for the ground floor flat and £400pa for the maisonette so I guess this increases the value of the freehold

          Comment

            #6
            We are in the same situation as you in terms of being the only two flats in a converted house. We have started the RTM process as an interim before possibly proceeding to buy the freehold later on. Our ground rents aren't as high as yours though.

            If you decide to apply for RTM, note that the law says that 50% of the flats in the building must participate but in the case where there is only two flats, both must be involved.

            Comment

              #7
              Hi Chris. I was wondering what would be the point of incurring the costs of setting up an RTM and then buying the freehold just after? Why not start freehold valuation/negotiations straight away?

              Comment

                #8
                It'll be a few years until we will be able to afford to buy the freehold. In the meantime RTM allows us to take control of the service charges.

                If you can afford to buy the freehold together from the start then yes you are much better off doing that and doing RTM first wouldn't be worthwhile.

                Comment

                  #9
                  RTM is a good move; when the freeholder has no other influence, he is likely to be more receptive to selling and at that stage you could test him with an offer.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    I have loosely discussed an RTM with the freeholder before and he told me it would not be worth it as I would have to pay his legal costs associated with replying to the necessary correspondence. Surely these can't amount to much and must also be reasonable? I also think he is underestimating the amount I could save on the annual insurance (which I calculate to be around £500 pa). I got the impression he was trying to warn me off in a veiled kind of way by suggesting his legal costs would be large!

                    Comment

                      #11
                      A RTM has legal rights to freeholders/agents accounts and records and more importantly any funds held on account including 'sinking funds' that may have been built up. Therefore RTM first, get all the documents and cash transferred and then buy the freehold.

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PDW1964 View Post
                        Hi and thanks again. I must admit that I didn't think there was a right to buy the freehold! The ground rents are fairly high in my opinion ie £270pa for the ground floor flat and £400pa for the maisonette so I guess this increases the value of the freehold
                        How many years unexpired remaining on the lease ? You are currently paying £670 p.a in ground rent. When does the ground rent increase ?

                        Are you willing to make an offer to freeholder to buy the freehold title at say, 20 x £670 = £13,400 ?

                        You could save £670 pa ground rent plus £500 insurance = £1170 p.a and recover the cost of buying the freehold over 11.5 years.

                        Comment

                          #13
                          In my experience, quality products, from different suppliers, are priced pretty closely. If you are getting much lower insurance quotes, are you sure you are really getting the same cover?

                          Comment

                            #14
                            There was another thread recently on here where the insurance premium was reduced substantially for the same cover by the same insurer so it is worth taking into account when considering whether or not to purchase the freehold.

                            Comment

                            Previous Next

                            Latest Activity

                            Collapse
                            • Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                              cday356
                              Hello all,

                              I would be grateful for some views on the following situation. We are a freeholder, and have a non-resident leaseholder who has been sub-letting his flat for more than a decade. We took over the freehold about 6 years ago. It has since come to our attention that the leaseholder...
                              16-06-2019, 04:23 AM
                            • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                              Lawcruncher
                              I am not aware of any ruling which says that a covenant to pay rent is excluded from a requirement for an undertenant to observe the head lease covenants.The fact that the covenant to pay rent is often excluded suggests, but does not confirm, that it would be included.

                              Under the law of...
                              17-06-2019, 00:51 AM
                            • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                              cday356
                              Hi Lawcruncher,

                              Thank you greatly for your constructive comments, you have given me a lot to think about.

                              In your view, does the sub-letting clause in our lease indeed give us the right to ask the sub-tenant to be liable for observing even the covenants to pay rent and service...
                              16-06-2019, 22:54 PM
                            • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                              Lawcruncher
                              The wording of any clause allowing inspection cannot be taken literally, It is implicit that the right must be exercised reasonably. I think the point probably comes when the course of action would be regarded as wholly unreasonable and certainly when it amounts to what would be harassment or some other...
                              16-06-2019, 20:24 PM
                            • Freeholders breach of the lease
                              surreygirl
                              We had a surveyor in last year in April 2018 which said that the outside render was now porous and needed to be repaired as a matter of urgency and should be a priority. At a meeting they voted to wait for a year until people had saved up the money and also they needed to have an asbestos test done....
                              16-06-2019, 09:39 AM
                            • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
                              leaseholder64
                              No freeholder can get £20k from all the normal leaseholders. I imagine 10-20% would be in financial crisis for just a £500 excess. I don't think there is any reasonable hope of getting the funds together by next year either, unless leaseholders are put in a position where several have to sell up...
                              16-06-2019, 20:16 PM
                            • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                              Lawcruncher
                              Concentrating on underletting:

                              The requirement to obtain a deed in the case of long residential leases is comparatively recent. It was always much more prevalent in commercial leases, the requirement usually being to enter into the covenant in the licence to underlet. The reason is because...
                              16-06-2019, 20:03 PM
                            • Sinking fund breach of covennat?
                              Stacker
                              The level of the sinking fund has never been agreed by the managing agent or the Directors at any AGM in respect of the accounting years ending December 2016 2017 2018 and 2019 as required by the Deeds of Covenant.
                              THE FIFTH SCHEDULE
                              10. To set aside(which setting aside shall be for...
                              16-06-2019, 19:27 PM
                            • Reply to Sinking fund breach of covennat?
                              leaseholder64
                              Directors should be making such decisions at board meetings, not at AGMs!

                              The clause appears to an enabling one, not a mandating one.

                              Given current interest rates the leaseholders are probably in a better financial position not having a trust fund. I happen to think that enough...
                              16-06-2019, 20:01 PM
                            • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
                              scot22
                              I agree with your sentiments. Unfortunately what is legal sometimes is conflict with commonsense and justice.
                              Are you required to have approval before starting work ?
                              Unless you can tick the boxes you may well have problems.
                              16-06-2019, 19:55 PM
                            View All
                            - Advertisement -
                            Working...
                            X