Retrospective planning - previous owner error!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Retrospective planning - previous owner error!

    I am just about to sell my house and I'm dismayed to learn that the previous owner did not abide by planning permission. He built an extension for which he obtained council and freeholder planning permission. However, it turns out that the internal layout of the extention is substantially different from what was agreed. I bought the house 15 years ago and my solicitor has not kept the files so I cannot even see how this was missed.

    The freeholder seems to have been fully aware but has only now disclosed the problem - right at the point of the sale. They have not named their price yet for retrospective consent but I fear it will be a large bill and I will have no choice but to pay it.

    This all seems very unfair. How can I get them down to a reasonable price? And what recourse do I have against my previous solicitor who missed this or the previous owner who did this?

    Karen

    #2
    Hi Karen, I'd considering lodging a complaint against your conveyancing solicitor. If your complaint remains unresolved, contact the Law Society (the Legal Ombudsman - 0300 555 0333). It is likely that a certificate of lawfulness could be sought, which is a £234 fee to the council and you'll need some plans of the existing (as built) layout so that they can compare with the permission that was granted. The whole thing should cost you less than £1K. Given that the Council have not taken enforcement action in the time you have owned the property, then they aren't now in a position to take action (also known as the 4 year rule). However, regularising your position through a certificate of lawfulness will sort this out. The caveat to this is if the building is listed - where different rules apply. The freeholder would have been aware of the planning process, but may not have been aware that the implementation of the permission was faulty.

    Comment


      #3
      The alternative to seeking consent is to buy the freehold title by enfranchisement of leasehold house under the 1967 Act.

      What is the unexpired years remaining on your lease and what is the annual ground rent ?

      Comment


        #4
        Planning permission doesn't cover internal layout. This sounds more like a lack of freeholder consent.

        Comment


          #5
          There could also be building control issues. It is far too late for a prosecution, but failing to comply could mean the property is unsafe.

          Comment


            #6
            Thanks so much for your advice. As you say, its about a lack of freeholder consent. The free holder has not sent a bill for nearly £5k including £1k for fees! I've just paid it because I can't afford for the house sale to come unstuck. How can I claw back this money? The previous conveyancing solicitor will not engage and they say the don't keep records longer than 7 years anyway. The costs seem unreasonable to me. its money for nothing! In the letter where the freeholder raised the lack of consent they showed an intimate knowledge of the inside of the house. They have never visited - so I can surmise the they knew all along what the previous owner did but never pursued until now. That's just so wrong.

            So ... am I better to go after the dodgy solicitor or the greedy freeholder once the sale has gone through?

            Karen

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • ownership of loft space
              katya000
              Hello,I own a long leasehold purpose built edwardian maisonette on the first floor of a 2 storey building.There is a similar flat below me.The attic is directly above my flat and only accesible from my flat.
              my lease includes the roof and i have to maintain the roof and can recover 50% of any...
              19-10-2018, 10:17 AM
            • Reply to ownership of loft space
              Lawcruncher
              The rights granted and reserved do not yield anything which cause me to revise what I said above.

              Your solicitor is thinking along the same lines as I am. If the word "in" were "on" I think you would be home and dry. Unfortunately we have "in". There are two...
              22-10-2018, 19:14 PM
            • Unwanted Dogs
              leaseman2014
              A few months ago we had reason to send a solicitors letter to a long lease holder because she was keeping a dog in her flat. It was not her dog but her daughters
              Our lease states this
              1. Not without the previous consent in writing of the Lessors (which consent may be revoked at any time without
              ...
              19-10-2018, 18:57 PM
            • Reply to Unwanted Dogs
              Logical.Lean
              There are two reasons why you wouldn't want a dog in a flat.

              One is potential Damage. Well the deposit and tenants home insurance might cover that. Landlords insurance also might cover it. But a well behaved lap dog (a nice cavalier perhaps) would not normally cause much damage. Unless...
              22-10-2018, 18:49 PM
            • Who appoints the Directors of our Company (which owns the freehold)
              esgd27
              Does anyone have any expertise on the appointment of Company Directors. We own (and rent out) one flat in a converted house of 5 flats. We and each of the other 4 flats owns one share in a company that owns the freehold.

              I am trying to confirm the process for appointing new Directors....
              10-10-2018, 16:33 PM
            • Reply to Who appoints the Directors of our Company (which owns the freehold)
              njs889333
              A simple check of the Confirmation Statement filed at Companies House should answer any doubts caused by post 20.
              22-10-2018, 16:48 PM
            • Fire escape
              Missycat1
              I had my lease extended , by private arrangement with my freeholder, a couple of years ago. I agreed to remove the access over the rear garden, in and out of the back gate, to access only as a secondary means of escape, in an emergency. This is fine, but I've looked at the deeds today, and I've noticed...
              19-10-2018, 20:22 PM
            • Reply to Fire escape
              Missycat1
              Yes I do .....it's always been there, by the looks of it. It's a purpose built flat.......the back bit was put on as an extension around 1930...most people think it's a fire escape....which it certainly doubles as....
              22-10-2018, 15:21 PM
            • RTM Related Questions ( Apologies If not the right forum)
              simple_shankar
              Dear All

              I am a director in the RTM company which has taken over the management a year ago and my enquiry is particular to a current situation.
              Now when the RTM was started, It has only two directors and they appointed an managing agent and also one of the their friend as an employee....
              21-10-2018, 20:48 PM
            • Reply to RTM Related Questions ( Apologies If not the right forum)
              eagle2
              This seems to be very similar to another topic on here. The directors can decide by a simple majority not to renew the management agreement with the managing agent. There may be grounds for terminating it early if the agent has not complied with the terms of the agreement.

              The Company is...
              22-10-2018, 14:55 PM
            Working...
            X