Retrospective planning - previous owner error!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Retrospective planning - previous owner error!

    I am just about to sell my house and I'm dismayed to learn that the previous owner did not abide by planning permission. He built an extension for which he obtained council and freeholder planning permission. However, it turns out that the internal layout of the extention is substantially different from what was agreed. I bought the house 15 years ago and my solicitor has not kept the files so I cannot even see how this was missed.

    The freeholder seems to have been fully aware but has only now disclosed the problem - right at the point of the sale. They have not named their price yet for retrospective consent but I fear it will be a large bill and I will have no choice but to pay it.

    This all seems very unfair. How can I get them down to a reasonable price? And what recourse do I have against my previous solicitor who missed this or the previous owner who did this?

    Karen

    #2
    Hi Karen, I'd considering lodging a complaint against your conveyancing solicitor. If your complaint remains unresolved, contact the Law Society (the Legal Ombudsman - 0300 555 0333). It is likely that a certificate of lawfulness could be sought, which is a £234 fee to the council and you'll need some plans of the existing (as built) layout so that they can compare with the permission that was granted. The whole thing should cost you less than £1K. Given that the Council have not taken enforcement action in the time you have owned the property, then they aren't now in a position to take action (also known as the 4 year rule). However, regularising your position through a certificate of lawfulness will sort this out. The caveat to this is if the building is listed - where different rules apply. The freeholder would have been aware of the planning process, but may not have been aware that the implementation of the permission was faulty.

    Comment


      #3
      The alternative to seeking consent is to buy the freehold title by enfranchisement of leasehold house under the 1967 Act.

      What is the unexpired years remaining on your lease and what is the annual ground rent ?

      Comment


        #4
        Planning permission doesn't cover internal layout. This sounds more like a lack of freeholder consent.

        Comment


          #5
          There could also be building control issues. It is far too late for a prosecution, but failing to comply could mean the property is unsafe.

          Comment


            #6
            Thanks so much for your advice. As you say, its about a lack of freeholder consent. The free holder has not sent a bill for nearly £5k including £1k for fees! I've just paid it because I can't afford for the house sale to come unstuck. How can I claw back this money? The previous conveyancing solicitor will not engage and they say the don't keep records longer than 7 years anyway. The costs seem unreasonable to me. its money for nothing! In the letter where the freeholder raised the lack of consent they showed an intimate knowledge of the inside of the house. They have never visited - so I can surmise the they knew all along what the previous owner did but never pursued until now. That's just so wrong.

            So ... am I better to go after the dodgy solicitor or the greedy freeholder once the sale has gone through?

            Karen

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Can Section 20 notices be avoided?
              parklands
              In the event of a major problem occurring which needs to be rectified quickly, is there any way repairs could be undertaken without the Section 20 approvals?

              Our Managing Agents have, in the past, taken over six months to process Section 20 applications and seek quotations before appointing...
              23-06-2019, 14:59 PM
            • Reply to Can Section 20 notices be avoided?
              parklands
              Thank you all for your contributions. I will copy all the information to the shareholders and call a General Meeting of the Company to discuss.
              Many thanks.
              24-06-2019, 06:54 AM
            • Flat roof or roof terrace not demised
              Frankii
              Hello,
              I've been told I should repost my problem in this section to get the best help so here goes. We live in a Victorian conversion comprising a ground floor flat with a kitchen extension into the garden and a flat which comprises the upper floors. We bought the ground floor flat in the early...
              15-04-2019, 17:46 PM
            • Reply to Flat roof or roof terrace not demised
              Frankii
              Yes, your probably right so they're gone. However I still want to thank everyone for their advice on the Landlordzone Forum as it has been invaluable and helped us through a difficult situation. With the new roof fitted at least we can get on with our lives and redecorate the kitchen diner where it...
              24-06-2019, 06:04 AM
            • Reply to Can Section 20 notices be avoided?
              eagle2
              To sum up, you should act reasonably and consult the leaseholders as far as possible, You should explain that the works are urgent and you intend to dispense with the full consultation procedure. You should seek the leaseholders views and request their agreement in writing. There is no need to apply...
              24-06-2019, 05:14 AM
            • Director discrimination possibly?
              Stacker
              A leaseholder is threatening bringing a discrimination case against company as they are the only flat who is not a Director and many directors have come and gone also a director is appointing directors as per the AOA and not holding any AGMs to endorse the appointments.There is no automatic right to...
              22-06-2019, 20:14 PM
            • Reply to Director discrimination possibly?
              eagle2
              A meeting can be called by members holding 5% of the voting rights under s303 Companies Act 2006, if the directors do not arrange a meeting under s304 CA 2006, the members can arrange a meeting themselves under s305 CA 2006.

              Before starting the process, the leaseholder should consider whether...
              24-06-2019, 04:51 AM
            • Sinking fund breach of covennat?
              Stacker
              The level of the sinking fund has never been agreed by the managing agent or the Directors at any AGM in respect of the accounting years ending December 2016 2017 2018 and 2019 as required by the Deeds of Covenant.
              THE FIFTH SCHEDULE
              10. To set aside(which setting aside shall be for...
              16-06-2019, 19:27 PM
            • Reply to Sinking fund breach of covennat?
              eagle2
              I suggest that you have a meeting of members and decide how to proceed. If some leaseholders object to being charged for past contributions, you should start to operate the sinking fund from now.
              If any leaseholder is required to contribute more than £250 the consultation process should be followed,...
              24-06-2019, 04:22 AM
            • Cash book account query
              pernes
              Some theme ago we the residents received a schedule of accounts which highlighted the balance of our individual accounts, ( a question I raised in a previous forum) it was queried that some residents who had given loans to the company were still owed money and in some cases had sold their flat and agreed...
              21-06-2019, 09:40 AM
            Working...
            X