Retrospective planning - previous owner error!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Retrospective planning - previous owner error!

    I am just about to sell my house and I'm dismayed to learn that the previous owner did not abide by planning permission. He built an extension for which he obtained council and freeholder planning permission. However, it turns out that the internal layout of the extention is substantially different from what was agreed. I bought the house 15 years ago and my solicitor has not kept the files so I cannot even see how this was missed.

    The freeholder seems to have been fully aware but has only now disclosed the problem - right at the point of the sale. They have not named their price yet for retrospective consent but I fear it will be a large bill and I will have no choice but to pay it.

    This all seems very unfair. How can I get them down to a reasonable price? And what recourse do I have against my previous solicitor who missed this or the previous owner who did this?

    Karen

    #2
    Hi Karen, I'd considering lodging a complaint against your conveyancing solicitor. If your complaint remains unresolved, contact the Law Society (the Legal Ombudsman - 0300 555 0333). It is likely that a certificate of lawfulness could be sought, which is a £234 fee to the council and you'll need some plans of the existing (as built) layout so that they can compare with the permission that was granted. The whole thing should cost you less than £1K. Given that the Council have not taken enforcement action in the time you have owned the property, then they aren't now in a position to take action (also known as the 4 year rule). However, regularising your position through a certificate of lawfulness will sort this out. The caveat to this is if the building is listed - where different rules apply. The freeholder would have been aware of the planning process, but may not have been aware that the implementation of the permission was faulty.

    Comment


      #3
      The alternative to seeking consent is to buy the freehold title by enfranchisement of leasehold house under the 1967 Act.

      What is the unexpired years remaining on your lease and what is the annual ground rent ?

      Comment


        #4
        Planning permission doesn't cover internal layout. This sounds more like a lack of freeholder consent.

        Comment


          #5
          There could also be building control issues. It is far too late for a prosecution, but failing to comply could mean the property is unsafe.

          Comment


            #6
            Thanks so much for your advice. As you say, its about a lack of freeholder consent. The free holder has not sent a bill for nearly £5k including £1k for fees! I've just paid it because I can't afford for the house sale to come unstuck. How can I claw back this money? The previous conveyancing solicitor will not engage and they say the don't keep records longer than 7 years anyway. The costs seem unreasonable to me. its money for nothing! In the letter where the freeholder raised the lack of consent they showed an intimate knowledge of the inside of the house. They have never visited - so I can surmise the they knew all along what the previous owner did but never pursued until now. That's just so wrong.

            So ... am I better to go after the dodgy solicitor or the greedy freeholder once the sale has gone through?

            Karen

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • how to become a RTM director
              Sahar
              hi

              I am the owner of a leasehold flat that is part of a block of 21 units that is under RTM control.
              This had been formed just before I bought the flat, so was not part of the process of switching from landlord controlled managing agent to RTM.
              I do not know much of the details...
              12-12-2018, 21:18 PM
            • Reply to how to become a RTM director
              leaseholder64
              The MA cannot enter contracts without the authorisation of either the board of directors or the members in general meeting.

              However that authorisation may be one that delegates authority to make decisions. Typically delegations would not extend to major expenditure items.

              ...
              19-02-2019, 21:16 PM
            • Ground Rent increase - allowed or not?
              scotty905
              Hi all, any help/advice much appreciated.

              Situation - Our freeholder has sent out this years ground rent charge with a 50% increase, prior to creating a RTM company we had constant issues with being charged large commissions on everything. With that in mind i requested that they show me...
              19-02-2019, 18:41 PM
            • Reply to Ground Rent increase - allowed or not?
              leaseholder64
              The whole point of RPI is that it tracks inflation. To a first approximation, the ratio of ground rent to the value of the property should be constant and the ground rent should be constant.

              The figures you quote show RPI doubling over 25 years, not 5 years.
              19-02-2019, 21:08 PM
            • Reply to how to become a RTM director
              Sahar
              hi guys

              Apologies for resurrecting this oldish now thread but I am in a pickle unfortunately.

              I spoke to a person who lives with the sole director (who pretty much been running things for her) and offered to become a director.
              This will hopefully be addressed after she...
              19-02-2019, 20:52 PM
            • Reply to Ground Rent increase - allowed or not?
              scotty905
              These 2 are the fourth schedule which concern how the rises are implemented, i fully understand that if i'm to take this further i will likely need to pay for legal advice but hoping to get as far as i can and understand whats happening before i do that.

              Many thanks
              19-02-2019, 20:45 PM
            • Reply to Ground Rent increase - allowed or not?
              scotty905
              Thanks to both of you for your replies,

              leaseholder64 - in reference to your comment on catching up on missed increments, i believe that's exactly what they're doing. the sum they say they have used is (ground rent x Jan 18 RPI)/RPI Jan 1993 = 50x276/137 = £100.72.
              I've tried to...
              this seems to clarify when rent is payable and reviewable
              19-02-2019, 20:43 PM
            • Share of freehold disputes
              Outnumbered
              Hello,
              I own the 1/4 share of freehold of a house, we are 4 flats in total. We arrange meetings on an adhoc basis when we feel there are issues to discuss, and we have email conversations about fixing things etc.
              At our last meeting things got heated and I felt ganged up upon by the 3 other...
              18-02-2019, 20:50 PM
            • Reply to Share of freehold disputes
              Macromia
              I see no reason why a meeting of four resident shareholder shouldn't be in one of their homes, and no reason why refreshment shouldn't include alcoholic drinks (assuming that everyone present was sober).
              Have you raised objections and suggested a viable alternative venue?

              Regarding...
              19-02-2019, 19:54 PM
            • Reply to Ground Rent increase - allowed or not?
              leaseholder64
              The only effect of the five years should be to avoid the ground rent increasing every year. You will end up paying less, in the long term, than if it was RPI based with annual increments.

              The five year to January RPI increase should be about 7.5%, not 50 or 100%. Are they catching up many...
              19-02-2019, 19:21 PM
            Working...
            X