Freeholder licence fee for consent to replace windows

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Freeholder licence fee for consent to replace windows

    I am planning to replace the windows in my flat as they are as old as the block (early 90s), timber single-glazed and the condensation/mould problem in the winter is really bad. The current windows also do not comply with Fire Egress Regulations. I plan to replace the windows with PVCU double-glazed windows of the same colour and design as the current windows.

    The block is owned by private freeholders and they are charging me £315 for a licence to change them as I am not replacing them like for like, even though my lease makes no reference to the material of the windows, only that I am responsible for repair/maintenance, and earlier this year the management company issued a section 20 for replacing the communal single-glazed timber windows with "white PVCu doubled-glazed windows", so they have already decided to switch to PVCU.

    My question is, is the £315 fee excessive and should I challenge them on it? I asked the surveyor and he said they are "taking the mickey" and "it's a money making exercise for them".

    #2
    The fee is excessive, unless it is specified in the lease. Some freeholders have a business model that depends on this sort of fee.

    However, flats do not have permitted development rights, so you will have to pay a significant amount for planning consent, unless your council has a local exception to this rule.

    Also note that uPVC windows are likely to make condensation and mould worse. The old wooden frames were probably quite leaky, so contributed to ventilation of the rooms. Also, the water tended to condense on the glass, whereas it will now condense on the walls. You need to address the root causes of the condensation.

    Comment

    Latest Activity

    Collapse

    • Long Lease Forfeit
      FlatGuy133
      The freeholder might be trying to forfeit my long term residential lease for a breach of covenant. I was wondering if I am right in thinking I do not have to worry about peaceable re-entry (ie the locks being changed when I am not there).
      17-02-2019, 19:59 PM
    • Reply to Long Lease Forfeit
      leaseholder64
      A nuisance would normally have to be something for which the authorities have taken action. Annoyance would be a lower threshold, but almost impossible to get forfeiture for, and a difficult covenant to enforce, other than by peer pressure.

      I would expect unsubstantiated rumours to be...
      17-02-2019, 20:28 PM
    • Reply to Long Lease Forfeit
      FlatGuy133
      Possibly the Causing a Nuisance to Other Residents. Well it is actually fairly complex because it is due to an untrue rumour someone has spread about me which is causing other residents to worry about their personal safety, I wouldnt be at all suprised if this didnt end up as case law
      17-02-2019, 20:12 PM
    • Reply to Long Lease Forfeit
      leaseholder64
      A long residential lease cannot be forfeited unless the First Tier Tribunal has confirmed that the covenant has been breached. Generally they will only allow forfeiture if you fail to take action that they require. That is likely to be to rectify or compensate for the breach. If you can't afford...
      17-02-2019, 20:11 PM
    • Reply to Long Lease Forfeit
      JK0
      May we know what covenant you breached?
      17-02-2019, 20:01 PM
    • Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
      redrabbit
      For the last 6 months myself and fellow residents have been trying to defend ourselves against freeholder company with S20 work. Incredibly frustrating as they seem to not have the answers to the most basic questions.

      Current estimate of work is £15k for each household.
      ...
      17-02-2019, 18:51 PM
    • Freeholder duties
      FreeH1
      I am trying to sell my flat for which I have a shared freehold with the 2 other flats in the block.

      Today I have been informed that one of the freeholders is refusing to complete and return the TR1 (and another form I believe is the PR1?). Without this we are unable to continue with the...
      15-02-2019, 18:49 PM
    • Reply to Freeholder duties
      FreeH1
      My understanding is if you own a share of the freehold you can’t just transfer your share to the new buyers, so effectively the whole freehold needs to be transferred which requires the TR1 form (happy to be corrected if this is not the case).

      I do believe the LPE form only needs completing...
      17-02-2019, 17:44 PM
    • Replacing RMC with RTM
      Centurino
      In seven days time we have a residents meeting to decide on the future of our apartment blocks; one with nine apartments, one with four apartments, thirteen total. They are about three meters apart physically. Our freeholder liquidated in 2012 and the lender took over as default who then set up an RMC...
      11-02-2019, 16:11 PM
    • Reply to Replacing RMC with RTM
      eagle2
      My comment at #17 was intended for Centurino, he may not have seen the moderator when he gets angry ...
      17-02-2019, 16:37 PM
    Working...
    X