Leaseholder/freeholder relationships

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Leaseholder/freeholder relationships


    Can a freeholder insist that a Leaseholder contacts the Managing Agent only with matters relating to the property?. We have a Leaseholder who insists on copying us into all communications, (via our personal email addresses and not the freeholder email address) and if the Managing Agent does not contact them immediately the emails may continue; or they will then telephone us (sometimes witholding their number). Very often the Leaseholder is rude and beligerant. We have advised them many times that they are to contact the Managing Agent and that the Managing Agent will advise us of anything that needs to be bought to our attention; but it seem to fall upon deaf ears... do we just have to put up with this and learn to switch off to anything that is not of an urgent nature?


    It would appear you want the rewards without the hassle, you have to ask yourself is your MA responding to reasonable requests and responding to leaseholders expecting to receive those replies in a timely manner, which as you already know is not correct or they wouldn't be contacting you.
    If you have an issue take it up with your MA who you probably pay a good amount to, to provide a good service of which the leaseholder also pays an increased charge to expect a decent service of which it appears he is not getting, strange that in the leasehold sector!


      I had trouble parsing the question. I wasn't sure if only referred to the managing agent, or only referred to the type of problem.

      In the former case, in this forum, AST tenants are often advised to bypass the letting agent, so I don't see why that should not also be true for the long leasholders.


        Good question. Ultimately the LH relationship is with you and I don't think there is anything you can do to prevent him contacting you.
        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.


          Thank you for your responses. So far there have been no rewards! Just thousands spent on legal fees in getting another Leaseholder to reinstate their flat to a single dwelling and stop letting a room to a family of 5! Our MA always responds within a day, we just feel that the Leaseholder in question has unreasonable expectations.


            You are a director and as such the leaseholder has every right to contact you and inform you or copy you in any relevant correspondence. You have stated elsewhere that you are too heavily involved, it is taking up too much of your time and the managing agents are not doing their job. The answer is simple, instruct your managing agents to deal with the correspondence and do not respond to the emails.


              Originally posted by Emilycarter View Post
              Thank you for your responses. So far there have been no rewards! Just thousands spent on legal fees in getting another Leaseholder to reinstate their flat to a single dwelling and stop letting a room to a family of 5!
              If done properly, and assuming a reasonably standard lease, those fees should be recoverable from the offending leaseholder.

              Generally, there are two ways of funding legal actions:

              - as actions preparatory to forfeiting the lease;

              - by getting the complaining leaseholder to cover the costs.

              It would be unusual for a lease to allow the cost of actions to be recovered from the service charge.

              It is quite common for leases to not require action to be taken, in which case, any action ought to be conditional on the complainant underwriting the legal costs; the freeholder is technically taking the action, because they have the standing to do so, but the reality is that is an action between two leaseholders.

              With the first option, you need to be sure that the FTT will agree there has been a breach of the lease, and should limit your expenditure to their fees until that has been determined.


                There is clearly far more to this than you are telling us.

                I recommend that you try to meet or telephone the leaseholder to discuss all issues. He seems to be trying to send you a message which he considers to be a problem which is not being dealt with. You should at least try to understand his point of view and consider it.

                Searching through the lease for minor breaches does not assist you, that is likely to inflame the relationship.

                As a director, you should not become too involved, you have managing agents to deal with the day to day issues. Your duty is to remove yourself from the detail and consider the wider issues such as whether or not the leaseholder has a valid point and whether or not the managing agents are carrying out their duties.

                You seem to have dealt with the major issues but that does not mean that the leaseholder has no say whatsoever or that he is not entitled to raise issues which are important to him. If he has raised issues with the managing agents and they have not been dealt with, his next option is to raise them with the directors. If you do not deal with them, the issues will escalate.

                If you do not agree with him, you should have a dispute resolution service to which he should be referred.

                It seems to me that you need to work on improving the relationship with this leaseholder otherwise you will have endless problems which will be time consuming and costly.


                Latest Activity


                • Advice please
                  I live in a block of (11) privately owned flats.
                  I am a resident and a director of the flats maintenance company.
                  About 5 years ago, the company engaged the services of a local estate agency to purely run the maintenance side.
                  So They just collect the monthly fees and look after...
                  18-04-2019, 18:39 PM
                • Reply to Advice please
                  I do not understand why commonhold has been raised within this thread, it makes absolutely no difference. Managing agents will continue to exceed their authority and the directors will still need to supervise them....
                  20-04-2019, 06:50 AM
                • Reply to Advice please
                  It is the directors who are appointed to make decisions and represent the leaseholders/members. There is no need to call a general meeting of members. You should keep minutes of the directors' meeting and inform the leaseholders/members.
                  20-04-2019, 06:45 AM
                • Reply to Advice please
                  I recommend that you do not manage yourself, it is much better to appoint an independent managing agent in this case. You would have a conflict of interest and your motives may be questioned. I suggest that you interview 2 or 3 agents and set out your requirements and see who best fits them, The new...
                  20-04-2019, 06:35 AM
                • Reply to Advice please
                  I was not suggesting that complaining to ARMA or a redress scheme was the best solution here, I was responding to a question, Incidentally, I am not sure what happened to ARMA-Q and their self regulating scheme.
                  20-04-2019, 06:29 AM
                • RMC liabilities - not working in leaseholders interests?
                  I'll try to be brief and have made reference to a related problem before: For almost a decade roof repairs on a 34 flat estate have been needed and in the past few years action has been taken but at snails pace. I have had some useful comments on this forum. I now have internal damage and RMC have requested...
                  18-04-2019, 08:35 AM
                • Reply to RMC liabilities - not working in leaseholders interests?
                  If a reserve fund were being used properly, the charges to the leaseholders would be spread evenly and the agent would already hold funds before the works commence. There should be no need to demand exceptionally large sums from leaseholders and I agree that there appears to be mismanagement. The only...
                  20-04-2019, 06:12 AM
                • Restitution for overpaid service charges
                  I have just had a First Tier Tribunal hearing for a service charge challenge spanning the years 2014-2016. The FTT confirmed what I suspected - that I had overpaid 10K of service charges and that although the FTT is not in a position to order repayment to me, I might consider making a county court claim...
                  18-04-2019, 09:01 AM
                • Reply to Restitution for overpaid service charges
                  It is surprising how many leaseholders fail to follow up a previous decision and that is what the freeholder will be relying on. Another Tribunal may not arrive at the same decision, although it is difficult to imagine in this case, the cost and inconvenience are all factors which seem to persuade leaseholders...
                  20-04-2019, 05:29 AM
                • Appointing Property Manager
                  Do shareholders/leaseholders have any rights to determine appointment of a property manager ?
                  19-04-2019, 17:04 PM