Leaseholder denying there is a tenant at the property

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Leaseholder denying there is a tenant at the property

    We have a Leaseholder who was renting their flat as two separate units ('managed' by a notorious rogue landlord) and who has now after solicitor letters reinstated flat to original. We have met the new letting agent, it is now tenanted as a single uniy, (which agent has confirmed) and another feeholder has met the tenants whilst at the property.

    We have asked for a copy of the AST as Lease provides for. Leaseholder replies that they did not know of this clause (has been mentioned previously by solicitor). Managing Agent gave clause details.

    After chasing, Leaseholder has now responded that there is no tenant, but can they be sent a copy of the Clause as they can't find it!

    There is history of lying and general obstructiveness. I assume we will just repond saying we know there is a tenant and indeed have met them.

    How does one deal with this ongoing? Is there nothing one can do but battle through each lie, each time? ... i suppose the answer will be yes, but jeez, its hard work!

    #2
    If managing agents are involved, it seems to be a simple matter for them to quote the clause in the lease.

    Reading between the lines, there seems to be friction between you and the leaseholder involved and I would save your energy for bigger battles. I would take a step back and let the managing agents deal with it.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for your response. The Managing Agent is half heartedly dealing ... but they ask us how we want to respond each time. But you are correct there has been friction as the property was being used on a rent to rent basis, changes to property without permission, gaining free electricity from other flats meters... so we are keen to keep on top of things now.

      Comment


        #4
        The managing agents should not involve the directors each time a decision is made and “half heartedly dealing” is inadequate, they should be carrying out their duties as defined in the management agreement

        As directors, you should be taking a back seat and reviewing the overall running of the Management Company and that does not need to involve “hard work” on your part. The managing agents charge for doing the hard work and you should allow them to carry out their duties with as little interference as possible.

        I think that you need to distinguish between serious and minor breaches of the lease and concentrate your energy on the former.

        A leaseholder is entitled to peaceful enjoyment of his property and if someone is going through the terms of the lease in order to find minor breaches, it could be a ground for complaint and used against you when you are dealing with the serious breaches.

        In this particular case, simply ask the managing agents to respond quoting the actual wording in the lease and that they have reason to believe that there is a tenant at the present time.

        Comment


          #5
          The final way to deal with his is to follow the forfeit route...you'd ask an FTT to determine if there is a breach...but you'd have to supply the actual evidence. Note whilst the ma may do the ground work. .actual legal actin can only be taken by the FH
          Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

          I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

          It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

          Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Freeholder duties
            FreeH1
            I am trying to sell my flat for which I have a shared freehold with the 2 other flats in the block.

            Today I have been informed that one of the freeholders is refusing to complete and return the TR1 (and another form I believe is the PR1?). Without this we are unable to continue with the...
            15-02-2019, 18:49 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder duties
            FreeH1
            Thanks for your response.

            We don’t really want to retain a share of the freehold and we are selling the flat as share of freehold. I would assume if we decided to keep the share of freehold the buyer may reduce their offer?

            The other form is a LPE1 form.

            Could...
            15-02-2019, 20:38 PM
          • Replacing RMC with RTM
            Centurino
            In seven days time we have a residents meeting to decide on the future of our apartment blocks; one with nine apartments, one with four apartments, thirteen total. They are about three meters apart physically. Our freeholder liquidated in 2012 and the lender took over as default who then set up an RMC...
            11-02-2019, 16:11 PM
          • Reply to Replacing RMC with RTM
            Centurino
            Excerpts from my Lease below:

            Lease Between:

            BUILDER/FREEHOLDER LIMITED (called "the Lessor") of the first part EXAMPLE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (called "the Management Company" of the second part ME (called "the Lessee") of the third part
            ...
            15-02-2019, 20:33 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder duties
            leaseholder64
            TR1 sounds like the Land Registry transfer form. The freeholder wouldn't to have to sign this for the leasehold, so I assume it is being done to transfer the share of the freehold, in which case you could assign the leasehold without but retain your share of the freehold.
            15-02-2019, 20:16 PM
          • Reply to Replacing RMC with RTM
            Centurino
            Yes, the lender is now the acting freeholder by default but the Land Registry still lists the builder/original freeholder. And that is my major concern that the freeholder will one day flog this site for cheap and the 6 leases not connected to the RMC could be in trouble.

            The freehold was...
            15-02-2019, 18:23 PM
          • Sublet consent and renewal fee
            Emma87KT
            Hi,

            I lived in the flat about 7 years, then moved out and let it out about 2 years now. Recently, the managment company is changed. And new managment company sent letter to request consent of subletting fee ( £80) according below clause in the lease. And they said after first consent period,...
            08-02-2019, 16:22 PM
          • Reply to Sublet consent and renewal fee
            eagle2
            As previously stated, the management company is not entitled to charge you unless there is a new tenancy agreement. Only then are you required to serve a notice and pay a registration fee. If 5 years have elapsed, the registration fee may be increased from the original figure of £40.00 but it must...
            15-02-2019, 16:55 PM
          • Freeholder worst-case on a leasehold house
            Telometer
            I should be grateful for your thoughts please. The ground rent was £10 per half year, with no provision for increase. The lease is for 999 years from 1970. The landlord is a notorious ground-rent company.

            The lease states "Not at any time hereafter without the consent of the Lessors...
            16-01-2019, 18:45 PM
          • Reply to Freeholder worst-case on a leasehold house
            Telometer
            Thank you Gordon999
            15-02-2019, 16:45 PM
          Working...
          X