Long term responsibilities of freeholder

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • timolloyd
    started a topic Long term responsibilities of freeholder

    Long term responsibilities of freeholder

    I own the freehold to a building containing 6 flats. The building is around 120 years old and in poor condition. The RTM company are doing their best to maintain it, but I'm worried that in the long run, they won't be able to raise sufficient funds to do things such as replace the roof and the fire escape.

    I'm worried that, as there are potential safety issues here, rather than just aesthetics, that I might be liable for the repairs/replacement, or any accidents that occur in the meantime.

    Can anyone advise?

  • Tipper
    replied
    I would be questioning the RTM mob on why they aren't maintaining the property in accordance with the lease...that's assuming the lease has appropriate clauses covering maintenance and repair of course!

    How about calling the RTM to a joint building inspection perhaps even with a property surveyor?

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    First Tier Tribunal, specifically the property division. See the statutory notice that accompanies any payable service charge demand.

    Leave a comment:


  • timolloyd
    replied
    What does FTT stand for?

    Leave a comment:


  • timolloyd
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
    Are they not obeying the lease and the law (which is all they have to do). The way they raise funds is as the lease specifies. Or are your concerns beyond the lease?

    Did you obey the lease before they became RTM?
    I think my concerns are beyond the lease although yours and @gordon999's points give me something additional to get sorted.

    Essentially there is a sinking fund, but I worry that it will never be enough even with substantial additional contributions from leaseholders, to cover the huge amount of work required over the next 24 months.

    The RTM are, in my opinion, doing a good job in difficult circumstances. But I'm worried that eventually 1 or 2 of the leaseholders will decide that ultimately it is my responsibility and expect me to fund the repairs. Particularly if things like the fire escape start to fall apart.

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    Originally posted by Gordon999 View Post
    1. I suggest you look at the cover under the buildings insurance policy to ensure it includes adequate cover for public liability.
    The insurers also need to know the level of disrepair, as they will evade a public liability claim if it was due to disrepair for which they had not set an appropriately raised premium.

    Leave a comment:


  • sgclacy
    replied
    As noted earlier the RTM does not absolve the freeholder from keeping a watching brief over the property. If the RTM fail to insure then the frreholder would be liable for their failure in the first instance although presumably he could take action against the directors for their failure in office

    If they fail to carry out works that are needed you can make an application for the appointment of a manager. The application is to the FTT . Before doing so you will need to serve on them a notice giving them reasonable time to do the work . The RTM cannot advance that they don’t have funds as the leases would give them the power to raise it from the leaseholders . The FTT have the powers to appoint a manager usually a surveyor who will press on with the works


    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon999
    replied
    1. I suggest you look at the cover under the buildings insurance policy to ensure it includes adequate cover for public liability.

    2. The lease probably needs some addition clause in the service charge to have collection of sinking fund for roof renewal and fire escape. You should consider offering this .

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewDod
    replied
    Are they not obeying the lease and the law (which is all they have to do). The way they raise funds is as the lease specifies. Or are your concerns beyond the lease?

    Did you obey the lease before they became RTM?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lorimer
    replied
    According to this JB Leitch article, a freeholder is not absolved from blame or responsibility if the Right to Manage Company fails to address repair/maintenance and health and safety issues ....
    If your property is managed by an RTM company and inadequate risk assessments have been carried out where does this leave you as a freeholder?

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • VAT charged twice on work?
    WAM
    If a one-off service charge has already had 20% VAT applied by the contractor, can an additional 20% VAT be charged on this total by the managing agent in the service charge schedule (before the fee % has been applied)?

    I am wondering if this is normal practice or an error.
    23-05-2019, 15:44 PM
  • Reply to VAT charged twice on work?
    WAM
    Thank you for your response - this is useful information.
    23-05-2019, 21:24 PM
  • Reply to VAT charged twice on work?
    leaseholder64
    An error; they can only charge VAT on their markup.
    23-05-2019, 20:31 PM
  • Freehold sale with 2 leases
    FSI1315
    Hello - I own a property that includes the entire freehold and leasehold to one of the 2 flats in the building. (I own the freehold my husband owns the leasehold).

    I am selling the property with the freehold.

    My buyer is getting nervous - and so am I about the transfer of the...
    23-05-2019, 14:33 PM
  • Reply to Freehold sale with 2 leases
    FSI1315
    Thank you so much for your reply. yes we live in the building and have done so for the past 5 years. This is very reassuring.

    So we don't even have to inflate the cost of the freehold it can be 100£....
    23-05-2019, 17:55 PM
  • Reply to Freehold sale with 2 leases
    DNM2012
    Your understanding is correct, the other leaseholder will never be able to accept the offer.

    Do you live in the property as your main residence and have done for more than 12 months? If so you don’t have to offer the right to first refusal anyway.

    Having said that your solicitor...
    23-05-2019, 17:02 PM
  • Right to Manage - Process Questions
    bigalxyz
    Hello forum,

    Very brief summary of my situation. I own a flat (110 years left on the lease) in a big old Victorian house in London. 11 flats in total, all leasehold. Fairly standard stuff.

    The guy who owns the freehold also does the property management via his own company....
    23-05-2019, 10:33 AM
  • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
    leaseholder64
    Companies Act 2006 section 303. If they fail to call it, proceed with the following sections.

    You need 28 days notice for any motion to remove an existing director.
    23-05-2019, 13:52 PM
  • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
    bigalxyz
    Thank you.

    Re: number of directors. I may be able to persuade some other leaseholders to do this (or not!). Articles of RMC say "number of directors may be any number not exceeding the number of issued shares" ie any number from 1 to 11. So having 1 director seems to be permissible...
    23-05-2019, 12:25 PM
  • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
    leaseholder64
    If you actually had an RTM, the freeholder would also have a vote, so your current arrangement gives you more power.

    A shareholder who cannot attend a meeting can appoint a proxy. It is a criminal offence for the calling notice for the meeting not to point this out.

    The majority...
    23-05-2019, 11:11 AM
Working...
X