Long term responsibilities of freeholder

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Long term responsibilities of freeholder

    I own the freehold to a building containing 6 flats. The building is around 120 years old and in poor condition. The RTM company are doing their best to maintain it, but I'm worried that in the long run, they won't be able to raise sufficient funds to do things such as replace the roof and the fire escape.

    I'm worried that, as there are potential safety issues here, rather than just aesthetics, that I might be liable for the repairs/replacement, or any accidents that occur in the meantime.

    Can anyone advise?

    #2
    According to this JB Leitch article, a freeholder is not absolved from blame or responsibility if the Right to Manage Company fails to address repair/maintenance and health and safety issues ....
    If your property is managed by an RTM company and inadequate risk assessments have been carried out where does this leave you as a freeholder?

    Comment


      #3
      Are they not obeying the lease and the law (which is all they have to do). The way they raise funds is as the lease specifies. Or are your concerns beyond the lease?

      Did you obey the lease before they became RTM?

      Comment


        #4
        1. I suggest you look at the cover under the buildings insurance policy to ensure it includes adequate cover for public liability.

        2. The lease probably needs some addition clause in the service charge to have collection of sinking fund for roof renewal and fire escape. You should consider offering this .

        Comment


          #5
          As noted earlier the RTM does not absolve the freeholder from keeping a watching brief over the property. If the RTM fail to insure then the frreholder would be liable for their failure in the first instance although presumably he could take action against the directors for their failure in office

          If they fail to carry out works that are needed you can make an application for the appointment of a manager. The application is to the FTT . Before doing so you will need to serve on them a notice giving them reasonable time to do the work . The RTM cannot advance that they don’t have funds as the leases would give them the power to raise it from the leaseholders . The FTT have the powers to appoint a manager usually a surveyor who will press on with the works


          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Gordon999 View Post
            1. I suggest you look at the cover under the buildings insurance policy to ensure it includes adequate cover for public liability.
            The insurers also need to know the level of disrepair, as they will evade a public liability claim if it was due to disrepair for which they had not set an appropriately raised premium.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
              Are they not obeying the lease and the law (which is all they have to do). The way they raise funds is as the lease specifies. Or are your concerns beyond the lease?

              Did you obey the lease before they became RTM?
              I think my concerns are beyond the lease although yours and @gordon999's points give me something additional to get sorted.

              Essentially there is a sinking fund, but I worry that it will never be enough even with substantial additional contributions from leaseholders, to cover the huge amount of work required over the next 24 months.

              The RTM are, in my opinion, doing a good job in difficult circumstances. But I'm worried that eventually 1 or 2 of the leaseholders will decide that ultimately it is my responsibility and expect me to fund the repairs. Particularly if things like the fire escape start to fall apart.

              Comment


                #8
                What does FTT stand for?

                Comment


                  #9
                  First Tier Tribunal, specifically the property division. See the statutory notice that accompanies any payable service charge demand.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I would be questioning the RTM mob on why they aren't maintaining the property in accordance with the lease...that's assuming the lease has appropriate clauses covering maintenance and repair of course!

                    How about calling the RTM to a joint building inspection perhaps even with a property surveyor?

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Uninformed manager and directors: what can happen?
                      sophiejo
                      Thank you, leaseholder64, for your help yet again with starting a new topic.

                      I hope I'm not going to sound hysterical, but I am really scared. We have a weird situation in our share-of-freehold set-up: A very intellectually limited real-estate agent, uncouth and ugly to boot, was put in...
                      20-01-2019, 20:27 PM
                    • Reply to Uninformed manager and directors: what can happen?
                      leaseholder64
                      Section 42 almost certainly applies to you. Section 42 of L&T 1987 is for your protection. If the lease doesn't allow for reserve funds, there is really no way you can be forced to contribute. If you are referring to L&T 1987 in general, yes you are largely bound by that Act.

                      ...
                      20-01-2019, 20:58 PM
                    • Signage and Communal Issues
                      Milesunder
                      Hopefully I can get some advice on an issue we are currently having at our development.

                      There are currently 10 properties at our development and these were owned by three friends up until three years ago. They then decided to sale them and 9 different people bought them. Because the previous...
                      03-01-2019, 07:47 AM
                    • Reply to Signage and Communal Issues
                      eagle2
                      It is unclear from your posts how much involvement the management company has at the present time. You also say that you are a director of the management company and refer to an AGM which implies that it remains active.

                      Who has appointed the managing agent? It ought to be the management...
                      20-01-2019, 07:41 AM
                    • Complicated lease extension - neighbour will not sign
                      pkbeney
                      Hello

                      I would be very grateful if somebody could please help me with my problem as it is driving me insane.

                      The situation is quite complicated but please bear with me as it does make sense...

                      In 2009 i purchased a first floor flat in a converted house.
                      At...
                      11-01-2019, 15:18 PM
                    • Reply to Complicated lease extension - neighbour will not sign
                      Macromia
                      I'd agree with this, but would suggest that the most important consideration may be whether or not the OP's solicitors failed to provide the services that they agreed to perform, and were paid for, during the purchase.
                      If the solicitors were negligent (and it sounds like they may have been if...
                      20-01-2019, 04:58 AM
                    • Reply to Complicated lease extension - neighbour will not sign
                      chris1544
                      What happened after he inspected your property? The reason I’m asking about this is that if it were me, I would be doing everything I could to get him to sign voluntarily first. It would seem that whatever happened in the past and whatever your solicitor or any other can do now, free or not, is reliant...
                      19-01-2019, 22:39 PM
                    • Reply to Signage and Communal Issues
                      Lawcruncher
                      If the sign was put up by the original landlord then it belongs to the current landlord as it is part of the property (in fact it probably is anyway). No tenant can object to it (a) if it was there before the leases were granted simply, because it was there before the leases were granted (b) if it was...
                      19-01-2019, 21:42 PM
                    • Illegal Alteration
                      puckxxx
                      Guys if you could give some advise on the following query it would be much appreciated.

                      I understand that a breach of a leasehold agreement needs to be determined by the FTT. Therefore my question implies a decision in my favour.

                      Do any of you know how much a Landlord can reasonably...
                      18-01-2019, 12:08 PM
                    • Reply to Illegal Alteration
                      JK0
                      Have you accepted ground rent/ service charge since becoming aware of the alterations?
                      19-01-2019, 19:01 PM
                    Working...
                    X