Share of Freehold : building maintenance issue

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Share of Freehold : building maintenance issue

    Hello Everyone,

    I am new to this (great) website, bear with me please if this question has already been asked.
    I own a flat in a share of freehold for about 4 years now, and there are 3 flats in total.

    The other two members of the freehold have been renting out their flats for more than 15 years, so they don't care much about the building maintenance.

    The lease explicitly mentions that the staircase area need to be maintained clean by the Freeholder all the time, and redecorated every 4 years.
    It also says the freeholder has to repaint the external walls every 7 years...
    We are 3 directors in the freeholding company, for which the incorporation documents are very light and don't mention anything about the building maintenance etc...

    The building is currently in very bad condition, and haven't been redecorated for more than 20 years...
    I have a building survey report done recently that highlights all work that need to be completed (painting, fire alarm system, etc...).

    The other members are not responsive to my requests (in emails) to redecorate and repair the building.

    My question is : what's the best way to "force" the other members to pay for the building maintenance work?
    Do I have to engage a solicitor? If so, any help to find a cheap one would be very helpful.

    Many thanks!!
    Jo




    #2
    Not directly answering the question, but:

    One wouldn't expect the company articles to say anything relevant; that will all be in the leases.

    It sounds like the company is committing criminal offences under, at least, the 2005 Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order.

    If it needs fire alarms, it may be a section 257, and committing offences under that legislation, as well.

    I would make sure that you are calling regular directors' meeting, with these items on the agenda, and either getting your requests minuted, or getting the failure to achieve a quorum recorded, as you may need this to defend against criminal charges, especially if someone is seriously harmed in a fire.

    I think you have the 7 and the 4 years mixed up. 7 is a typical internal interval, and 4 a typical external one. If all that is wrong is breaching these, you would have to sue, as a leaseholder, not a director, for the breach of the contract formed by the lease.
    Last edited by leaseholder64; 13-02-2018, 18:27 PM. Reason: Typo

    Comment


      #3
      leaseholder64, thanks for your quick reply.

      Do you know who is the best professional (solicitor, lawyer?) to assist me in the legal action (as a leaseholder) against the freeholding company?
      I am based in Fulham, and many London based solicitors/lawyers are ridiculously expensive...

      Comment


        #4
        Solicitors for L&T Act problems in central London area can charge £300 per hour or more.

        You may be able to get free legal advice from LEASE ( www.lease-advice.org ) or if you join the FPRA ?

        http://www.flat-living.co.uk/links/9...sociation-fpra

        https://www.fpra.org.uk/

        Comment


          #5
          Section 257 should have read section 257 HMO.

          Comment


            #6
            Its irrelevant if the other LHs dont live there its still their property and they must abide by the lease.

            You have found the slight flaw in shared ownership in that the owners are both LHs and FHs (shared) so it can end up in the wierd scenario of suing yourself if a LH doesnt comply with the lease.

            This sounds like it would be better settled with all 3 coming together instead of one of you using a solicitor, IMO solicitors are rarely needed, many of us here have been involved in complicated legal action, it just needs reasonable intelligence.

            If the other 2 are not interested then eventually the building will collapse or suffer some major damage then they wont be able to rent to anyone.
            Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

            I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

            It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

            Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

            Comment


              #7
              Im not sure if HMO rules apply to 3 flats in one building, as it isnt a house - https://www.gov.uk/house-in-multiple-occupation-licence
              Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

              I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

              It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

              Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

              Comment


                #8
                We are talking about a section 257 HMO, which relates to converted flats not converted to modern building regulation standards. Fire alarms are only needed in the communal areas of flats to compensate for fire safety defects. A conversions to modern standards is unlikely to require such compensation, which makes me think this may be a pre-1991 standard conversion, and therefore subject to section 257 HMO rules.

                Comment


                  #9
                  This is the text of section 257: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga...34/section/257 As more than one of the flats is being sub-let, it also meets the less than 2/3 owner occupied condition.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The overriding point is that the lease provisions do not simply melt away just because the leaseholders have bought the freehold. If the leases state that external and internal redecoration must be done at certain intervals and that subletting is not permitted without the freeholder's prior written consent etc. then those provisions must still be enforced...

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The obligations should be in the lease, not the incorporation documents. Whilst it is possible to change the former, and easier to do so than change the leases, it is not the right way.

                      I think you, urgently, need to read the RICS Residential Service Charge Guide. The contributions should be defined in the leases and do not belong to the company, but rather to one or more statutory trust fund(s).

                      Generally all the company articles would do in this respect is enable the company to manager the service charge, and if it is the freeholder, own the property, and possibly limit the circumstances in which it could sell the property.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • VAT charged twice on work?
                        WAM
                        If a one-off service charge has already had 20% VAT applied by the contractor, can an additional 20% VAT be charged on this total by the managing agent in the service charge schedule (before the fee % has been applied)?

                        I am wondering if this is normal practice or an error.
                        23-05-2019, 15:44 PM
                      • Reply to VAT charged twice on work?
                        WAM
                        Thank you for your response - this is useful information.
                        23-05-2019, 21:24 PM
                      • Reply to VAT charged twice on work?
                        leaseholder64
                        An error; they can only charge VAT on their markup.
                        23-05-2019, 20:31 PM
                      • Freehold sale with 2 leases
                        FSI1315
                        Hello - I own a property that includes the entire freehold and leasehold to one of the 2 flats in the building. (I own the freehold my husband owns the leasehold).

                        I am selling the property with the freehold.

                        My buyer is getting nervous - and so am I about the transfer of the...
                        23-05-2019, 14:33 PM
                      • Reply to Freehold sale with 2 leases
                        FSI1315
                        Thank you so much for your reply. yes we live in the building and have done so for the past 5 years. This is very reassuring.

                        So we don't even have to inflate the cost of the freehold it can be 100£....
                        23-05-2019, 17:55 PM
                      • Reply to Freehold sale with 2 leases
                        DNM2012
                        Your understanding is correct, the other leaseholder will never be able to accept the offer.

                        Do you live in the property as your main residence and have done for more than 12 months? If so you don’t have to offer the right to first refusal anyway.

                        Having said that your solicitor...
                        23-05-2019, 17:02 PM
                      • Right to Manage - Process Questions
                        bigalxyz
                        Hello forum,

                        Very brief summary of my situation. I own a flat (110 years left on the lease) in a big old Victorian house in London. 11 flats in total, all leasehold. Fairly standard stuff.

                        The guy who owns the freehold also does the property management via his own company....
                        23-05-2019, 10:33 AM
                      • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
                        leaseholder64
                        Companies Act 2006 section 303. If they fail to call it, proceed with the following sections.

                        You need 28 days notice for any motion to remove an existing director.
                        23-05-2019, 13:52 PM
                      • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
                        bigalxyz
                        Thank you.

                        Re: number of directors. I may be able to persuade some other leaseholders to do this (or not!). Articles of RMC say "number of directors may be any number not exceeding the number of issued shares" ie any number from 1 to 11. So having 1 director seems to be permissible...
                        23-05-2019, 12:25 PM
                      • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
                        leaseholder64
                        If you actually had an RTM, the freeholder would also have a vote, so your current arrangement gives you more power.

                        A shareholder who cannot attend a meeting can appoint a proxy. It is a criminal offence for the calling notice for the meeting not to point this out.

                        The majority...
                        23-05-2019, 11:11 AM
                      Working...
                      X