Refusing to send shareholder the Statutory Shareholders member register

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Refusing to send shareholder the Statutory Shareholders member register

    I am a shareholder in a company that is managed by a block managing agent. I requested the Statutory shareholders member register from the block managing agent and was fobbed off that it is at company's house and it wasn't. They then sent me the last annual report from companies house which does show some shareholder information but not what is required for the Shareholders member register. They now tell me they cannot send it to me due to the Data Protection Act.

    Is this true?

    Thanks in advance.


    It is specifically exempt from the Data Protection Act.

    If you want them to send a copy, you have to pay for it, even if you are a member.

    Did you state the reason for requesting it and whether you intend to supply it to anyone else? This is necessary for a valid request to inspect (free to members/shareholders) or have copies (chargeable).

    I'm not sure who the prosecuting authority is for this, but it is a criminal offence not to provide access, unless a court rules against it. The court process was intended for companies like Huntingdon Life Sciences, and a flat management company isn't going to apply to the court, and would probably be laughed at if they did. The criminal offence applies to the company secretary and directors to the extent that they had culpability for the failure.


      The company has to file an annual report of its members to Companies House and you can access the information by going to CH website.

      You can also view the annual accounts and Directors names in the company filings of previous years.

      Use you own computer or go to a main public library with computers for internet use.


        I'd forgotten about companies with shares having to do this, but the legislation now seems to catch companies limited by guarantee as well, although neither of the two national, limited by guarantee, organisations that I belong to and checked seem to have done this!


          I am trying to understand what shareholders have a right to see as I am not provided with anything nor consulted...


            The things that everyone is allowed to see (register of members, directors' service addresses, the company constitution, abbreviated accounts, etc.)

            Also the complete statutory accounts, but not the supporting documents (RTM's are required to provide more), the minutes of general meetings (but not board meetings) and written resolutions of the members, for the last ten years.


              Originally posted by Milly26 View Post
              I am trying to understand what shareholders have a right to see as I am not provided with anything nor consulted...

              The first place to start would be your articles of association, if you have not been provided with them check online at Companies House, where you will be able to download them free of charge, most likely the very first filing made by your company.

              The next place to look would be Companies Act 2006, although if your company was incorporated prior to this, you would have to determine what is still in force from your articles and what has been replaced. A good reference document is available at the following link;



                1. The information about the Management Company or RTM Company can be viewed at the Companies House website for no charge :

                You can get some details about a company for free, including:
                • company information, for example registered address and date of incorporation
                • current and resigned officers
                • document images
                • mortgage charge data
                • previous company names
                • insolvency information

                2. The annual service charge is collected by the Management Company or RTM for maintenance of building and the unspent funds held by the MA belongs to the leaseholders and is not accounted for in the company's annual account filed at Companies House.
                The Managing agent or RTM has to arrange for audited accounts to be made available within 6 months after end of year to leaseholders. After being supplied with copy of audited accounts and for a six month period , the leaseholder has the right to make an appointment to visit the office when the accounts and bank statements can be viewed and take copy for a reasonable charge.

                Anyone wanting a free guide to long leases can download from LEASE website

                3. The standard required of a managing agent is set by the RICS Residential Management Code which can be bought from RICS online bookshop. for about £21 + postage.

                4. You are allowed to get the name and contact details of other leaseholders because the rules for buying the freehold title of the block requires 50% or more leaseholders to sign the legal forms under the 1993 Act.


                  Managing agents only have to provide accountant certified accounts, not audited accounts, and even the accountant certification isn't needed for smaller blocks. They do not need to provide them unless a leaseholder formally requests them, and, if requested more than five months after the end of the accounting year, a month is allowed for providing them.

                  The RICS do advise that they be volunteered. The relevant part of the RICS guidelines is 7.13, which uses "should", so is advisory only, and says that the level of accountant involvement should be proportional to the size of the property.

                  Accountant certification means that the accounts probably reflect the source documents provided to the accountant. Auditing means that the accounts are probably free of a sufficiently high level of fraud, or bad financial control as to make them no longer true and fair. (In a national society I belong to, the managing director misused about £50,000 before the auditors determined that the accounts were no longer true and fair!)


                    Thank you all for your helpful advice


                    Latest Activity


                    • Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                      Hello all,

                      I would be grateful for some views on the following situation. We are a freeholder, and have a non-resident leaseholder who has been sub-letting his flat for more than a decade. We took over the freehold about 6 years ago. It has since come to our attention that the leaseholder...
                      16-06-2019, 04:23 AM
                    • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                      I am not aware of any ruling which says that a covenant to pay rent is excluded from a requirement for an undertenant to observe the head lease covenants.The fact that the covenant to pay rent is often excluded suggests, but does not confirm, that it would be included.

                      Under the law of...
                      17-06-2019, 00:51 AM
                    • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                      Hi Lawcruncher,

                      Thank you greatly for your constructive comments, you have given me a lot to think about.

                      In your view, does the sub-letting clause in our lease indeed give us the right to ask the sub-tenant to be liable for observing even the covenants to pay rent and service...
                      16-06-2019, 22:54 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                      The wording of any clause allowing inspection cannot be taken literally, It is implicit that the right must be exercised reasonably. I think the point probably comes when the course of action would be regarded as wholly unreasonable and certainly when it amounts to what would be harassment or some other...
                      16-06-2019, 20:24 PM
                    • Freeholders breach of the lease
                      We had a surveyor in last year in April 2018 which said that the outside render was now porous and needed to be repaired as a matter of urgency and should be a priority. At a meeting they voted to wait for a year until people had saved up the money and also they needed to have an asbestos test done....
                      16-06-2019, 09:39 AM
                    • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
                      No freeholder can get £20k from all the normal leaseholders. I imagine 10-20% would be in financial crisis for just a £500 excess. I don't think there is any reasonable hope of getting the funds together by next year either, unless leaseholders are put in a position where several have to sell up...
                      16-06-2019, 20:16 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholders and Sub-tenants
                      Concentrating on underletting:

                      The requirement to obtain a deed in the case of long residential leases is comparatively recent. It was always much more prevalent in commercial leases, the requirement usually being to enter into the covenant in the licence to underlet. The reason is because...
                      16-06-2019, 20:03 PM
                    • Sinking fund breach of covennat?
                      The level of the sinking fund has never been agreed by the managing agent or the Directors at any AGM in respect of the accounting years ending December 2016 2017 2018 and 2019 as required by the Deeds of Covenant.
                      THE FIFTH SCHEDULE
                      10. To set aside(which setting aside shall be for...
                      16-06-2019, 19:27 PM
                    • Reply to Sinking fund breach of covennat?
                      Directors should be making such decisions at board meetings, not at AGMs!

                      The clause appears to an enabling one, not a mandating one.

                      Given current interest rates the leaseholders are probably in a better financial position not having a trust fund. I happen to think that enough...
                      16-06-2019, 20:01 PM
                    • Reply to Freeholders breach of the lease
                      I agree with your sentiments. Unfortunately what is legal sometimes is conflict with commonsense and justice.
                      Are you required to have approval before starting work ?
                      Unless you can tick the boxes you may well have problems.
                      16-06-2019, 19:55 PM