Undisclosed section 20 notice by seller & management company prior to sale of flat

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Undisclosed section 20 notice by seller & management company prior to sale of flat


    I recently bought a flat and within 2 months of getting the keys, I was served a notice for payment for the first stage of major works (work needed to the outside of the building)- to the tune of £12.5k. The management company sent me letters that they had sent the seller two years ago, detailing the section 20 notice, 2 estimates for the costs of the work etc.

    I have emailed the conveyancer, who is a bit useless and not willing to look into anything further, and suggested speaking to the management company to get a reduction.

    My question is this- both management company and the seller did not disclose this prior to the sale. The forms that they filled in had specific questions about section 20 and planned works, hence the information was actively omitted as they stated "no", so it is more that they lied on the forms as opposed to the information being ommited.

    Is the seller the one that is liable for this?- and if so can I just ask them for this money, or would i need to reclaim this via the courts, as the total cost of the works is £20k, which was known about prior to the sale of the flat and I could have obviously asked for a reduction from the cost of the flat because of this.

    Any advice, recommendations etc would be greatly appreciated!

    2 years is a pretty long duration between S20 and works.

    What is the exact wording of the disclosure request and responses (from each party)?
    Why exactly was there this delay?

    It is curious why management company would give a false answer -- I cannot see any motive for them to do so.


      This will be question 4.8 on the LPE1 form, which will be copyright. There are specimens published on the web, but it basically asks about section 20 work planned for the next two years, and where it is in the life cycle from anticipated to done but not yet charged. It also asks for details and the expected contribution.


        Contact Sebastian at leaseholdknowledge.com with your problem. He may know others in same situation facing extortionate demands for maintenance of property you don't own.


          Thanks- will do. Any thoughts on contacting the seller to ask for this amount or to just go through the courts?

          @andrewdodd- it was on the forms that they were asked to fill out- the LPE1/3 and another one, but the questions were about works and pending works and section 20 notices


          Latest Activity


          • Successful RTM claim
            Hi all,

            I wonder if anybody can be of assistance.

            Cutting a long story short we have managed to obtain the RTM from a very aggressive freeholder. The right will transfer to us in August.

            It is a small block of four converted one bedroom flats

            We have...
            24-05-2018, 14:03 PM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            Thanks Leaseholder64 much appreciated.

            So as above I do not need to go through another section 20. i.e. If all 3 leaseholders sit down and agree specs etc costing say £5k. We would all divide the amount correctly and sign papers saying monies paid and agreed etc. Would this be sufficient?...
            26-05-2018, 15:32 PM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            Section 20 protects the leaseholders, not the freeholder. If the freeholder objected it would be because the proposed work was not sufficient to comply with the lease, not because of consultation issues.

            You should get a lot of information on handover. Even if the contractors are abandoned,...
            26-05-2018, 15:15 PM
          • Sub Letting Fees
            Another topic on this, sorry I can see there have been plenty.

            I have today received a letter from {Mod - name removed} on behalf on {Mod - name removed}. They are saying I have not replied to their letter dated May 19 2017 (I haven't) and things will be passed on to external solicitors...
            21-05-2018, 18:22 PM
          • Reply to Sub Letting Fees
            I think the organisation in question is not a managing agent. They make money purely from acting as an agent for the freeholder for ground rent and administration charges. i don't think they manage the property.

            I suspect you have to think long and talk to your MP as it looks like they...
            26-05-2018, 14:58 PM
          • Reply to Sub Letting Fees
            What is your recommendation if the freehold was sold without Right of First Refusal offer to leaseholders and current freeholder is using a managing agent to demand extortionate subletting fees ?
            26-05-2018, 14:15 PM
          • £150 late penalty fee
            Our company has recently been charged £150 late penalty fee for failing to file our accounts on time. The person responsible for this refused to sign our accounts as he had resigned as a Director (although the accounts document had his name on it). The former Director made no attempt to inform anyone...
            21-05-2018, 16:33 PM
          • Reply to £150 late penalty fee
            Exactly. Service charge ledgers are never/should never be filed --- they have nothing to do with the Company as such. The Company (whether dormant or otherwise) still has to file accounts (even if dormant accounts). Failure to file accounts leads to an automatic initial £150 fine. Failure to file the...
            26-05-2018, 09:17 AM
          • Reply to Successful RTM claim
            Thanks again Gordon999. Appreciated.

            Yes I have last years Insurance policy which has the rebuild value and a terrorism clause.Shall l add the RPI to the price?

            If you have time to read the below I would be very happy. In the meantime I have ordered this book:

            26-05-2018, 08:47 AM
          • Reply to £150 late penalty fee
            Even freeholdingt RMCs don't have to file service charge accounts. Even dormant ones have to file statutory dormant accounts.

            However, if does make one wonder if they are failing to implement L&T 1987 S42, or at least mixing the service charge and company monies.
            26-05-2018, 08:46 AM