Nil premium for lease extension when shares in freehold company also owned?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Nil premium for lease extension when shares in freehold company also owned?

    My parents own a lease of a flat and shares in the company that owns the freehold. The property was built, freehold established and 99 year leases granted about 55 years ago; the freehold was bought by the lessees about 40 years ago; most of the leases in the block were extended to 999 year leases for nil premium about 25 years ago, a few more were extended during the next 12 years again for nil premium; only two short leases were not extended, we don't know why. My parents bought one of these short leases (plus the shares) about 20 years ago, that is a couple of years before the last lease extension. They lost track of the lease situation, are now elderly and infirm, would like to sell and have belatedly realised they have a short lease so would like to extend the lease to 999 years like the other leases. Should they have the right to be treated in the same way as the other leaseholders/shareholders, i.e. to extend their lease for nil premium?

    My gut reaction is to say yes with an ex gratis token amount in recognition of taking It An additional 40 years later. Seems fair, but not a legally researched suggestion.


      My mother was in a similar situation having somehow not gained her 999 year lease when she became a shareholder in the freehold company. After she died we pressed the freehold company to issue the correct 999 year lease for no charge and they did. Our argument was along the lines of if every other shareholder gave themselves a free 999 year lease then she should have had one too!


        Thanks, Tipper. Sounds like your mother's situation was very similar to my parents'. Did you have to take legal advice or you just appealed to the directors' morals?


          Sorry I can't remember the details now but I know it took considerable badgering of the freehold company and long waits for directors' meetings to get it sorted out. I think it was the company secretary that sorted it out in the end. However they issued a variation to the lease rather than a new lease, I presume this was cheaper and finally quicker for them.
          The flat sold later with no problems although it seems the variation was not immediately registered at HMLR which caused a small delay. I don't know whose failure that was.


            I believe the reason for doing variations is that a new lease would involve creating a formal title plan. As far as I know, it does actually create a new lease, though.


              "freehold was bought by the lessees about 40 years ago"

              And the then newly made shareholders would have contributed to the purchace of the freehold.
              Did your parents, or any owner of current flat, contribute Money for purchace of the freehold?
              If so, they should get a free 999 yr lease.
              If not, then expect to pay the same amount the other leaseholders contributed at the time.


              Latest Activity


              • RTM Member
                Apologies in advance for the basic question.

                I hear a lot of talk of becoming a “member” of an RTM. Is this something you have to officially apply for, or are you automatically a member if you own a property in the block being managed by an RTM.

                The RTM as one appointed director...
                21-02-2019, 01:32 AM
              • Homeless living in flats hallways

                My first time here - I'm lucky I've managed 8 years of land-lording without serious issue! Until now...

                My tenanted flat is on the 2nd floor of a block. There are 3 blocks in total on the estate. In the past 2 to 3 weeks my tenants have reported homeless people sleeping,...
                18-02-2019, 13:57 PM
              • Reply to Homeless living in flats hallways
                I suggest you ( and other flats ) make a complaint to the local MP who is the right person to deal with this problem.

                The management company should change the entrance door lock and issue set of keys to each flat occupier.
                21-02-2019, 00:04 AM
              • Can a RMC refuse a wayleave signed by the freeholder?
                I live in a leasehold flat (owned). The estate is of 40 flats.
                The only ISP available is BT (Sky, Talk Talk etc).
                I have got Hyperoptic on board and they are looking to service the buildings.
                They have contacted the freeholder who is wiling to sign a wayleave for a fee (supposedly...
                20-02-2019, 13:45 PM
              • Reply to Can a RMC refuse a wayleave signed by the freeholder?
                If your site is managed by a RTM, any fees except "ground rent" payable to freeholder becomes due to the RTM . The freeholder is only responsible for collecting ground rent and dealing with proceedings for forfeiture.

                The RTM is responsible for managing the site and approving...
                20-02-2019, 23:50 PM
              • Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
                For the last 6 months myself and fellow residents have been trying to defend ourselves against freeholder company with S20 work. Incredibly frustrating as they seem to not have the answers to the most basic questions.

                Current estimate of work is £15k for each household.
                17-02-2019, 18:51 PM
              • Reply to Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
                In your post 3, you say your property is a town house and not a flat ? What does your property title ( at Land Registry) say ?

                Are you owner of a leasehold House Or leasehold Flat ? Are some 21 houses under freehold title at your site ?
                20-02-2019, 23:33 PM
              • Can RTM sole director make all decisions
                hi guys
                I asked a question before of how to become a RTM director, still trying to become one, but due to the current sole director -> MA arrangement I am unsure if I can do anything really.

                Therefore, I would like to ask a simple question as it seems there is contradictory information...
                20-02-2019, 21:43 PM
              • Reply to Can RTM sole director make all decisions
                hi leaseholder64

                I really appreciate your comments, and willingness to help but I still do not understand why Article 16 is more important than Article 12 ?
                It (no. 12) clearly states that "if no provision of the articles require it to have more than one director", and...
                20-02-2019, 22:59 PM
              • Reply to Section 20 despite long term neglect of the buildings
                I'm a Leaseholder who went through S20 major works. It started at £7k and spiralled to £42k (my share alone) due to unforeseen works.

                Had I known more about the S20 process I would have sought advice from a solicitor early on.

                Also had I known that lessees are able to object...
                20-02-2019, 22:25 PM