LVT tribunal decision on who is responsible for replacement of door entry handset

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    LVT tribunal decision on who is responsible for replacement of door entry handset

    On 02/10/2012 on a thread titled "Who pays?" a member called "Leaseholdanswers" quoted from an LVT tribunal decision that said "a door entry handset is essential to the function of an entryphone system and its repair as a service charge cost should reflect that". I would appreciate it if anyone could give me any links or references to find this decision as I would like to refer to it directly.I am a leaseholder and the LVT decision seems relevant to my situation as the management company is saying that the service charge does not cover replacement of a handset. However, as discussed in the previous thread it is a communal system and the lease makes no specific reference to the intercom system or handsets.

    I have tried to PM "Leaseholdanswers" to get a link/reference to this decision but the system says the member has his quota of private messages and I see that member has not been on the site for several months, so I wondered if anyone knows where I might find this decision. I have looked on the tribunal decisions website but on my search about 11,000 results came up so I need to narrow it down to find this particular decision. Thank you in advance.

    #2
    For the cost of your internal handset ( i have bought a few ) it's not worth the trouble on here to debate.
    Just pay for the replacement handset, as it is only you that has use of it, and no one else, therefore your hand set is not communaL.

    Only the outside intercom is communal.

    You may not like my answer, but that is what I say to my leaseholders.

    Comment


      #3
      Has the handset been replaced ?. As above Id just do and pay for it myself unless its very pricey. For example my front door is damaged, Ive just bought a replacement for £20 and will fit myself, now it maybe that it should in theory be repaired by the FH and the cost recouped through the service charge (divided by 2 as there are 2 flats) but the cost would no doubt be a lot higher than £20.
      Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

      I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

      It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

      Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

      Comment


        #4
        This could be viewed either way - I run the RTM for a large block of flats with an entryphone system.

        The lease says the man co repairs and maintains the entry system, however when phones die, we bill the leaseholder for the parts to replace it. Our interpretation is that the phone is a fixture and fitting of the flat, the system itself works fine but the handset replacement should be billed to the leaseholder.

        In the same way we maintain the TV and Sky system but if your TV breaks we won't be replacing that.

        These things are always down to the interpreatation of the lease, it hasn't caused us any arguments yet - I would say going to the LVT over a £40 handset is OTT.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Successful RTM claim
          skidder
          Hi all,

          I wonder if anybody can be of assistance.

          Cutting a long story short we have managed to obtain the RTM from a very aggressive freeholder. The right will transfer to us in August.

          It is a small block of four converted one bedroom flats

          We have...
          24-05-2018, 14:03 PM
        • Reply to Successful RTM claim
          leaseholder64
          I'm a bit confused because the first half says you are arranging the insurance and the second half says the freeholder is!

          Why would you think that he freeholder would not want to be name as having an interest in the insurance? (I would say it was essential they were named!)
          ...
          27-05-2018, 14:20 PM
        • Reply to Successful RTM claim
          skidder
          Hi Gordon999

          I have received a notice confirming RTM will commence in August. The freeholder states that the insurance will run out on this date and I will have to arrange. Policy is currently £1920 for four flats. I need to name the freeholder on my policy.

          Also can you confirm...
          27-05-2018, 10:38 AM
        • Reply to Successful RTM claim
          Gordon999
          Your RTM Is due to commence in August and will take over running the service account and maintenance of building. The RTM decides everything and freeholder is left with collecting the ground rent and dealing with forfeiture of lease (which is unlikely to happen ) .

          When does your current...
          27-05-2018, 10:21 AM
        • Reply to Successful RTM claim
          skidder
          Thanks Leaseholder64 much appreciated.

          So as above I do not need to go through another section 20. i.e. If all 3 leaseholders sit down and agree specs etc costing say £5k. We would all divide the amount correctly and sign papers saying monies paid and agreed etc. Would this be sufficient?...
          26-05-2018, 15:32 PM
        • Reply to Successful RTM claim
          leaseholder64
          Section 20 protects the leaseholders, not the freeholder. If the freeholder objected it would be because the proposed work was not sufficient to comply with the lease, not because of consultation issues.

          You should get a lot of information on handover. Even if the contractors are abandoned,...
          26-05-2018, 15:15 PM
        • Sub Letting Fees
          isthisnameavailable
          Another topic on this, sorry I can see there have been plenty.

          I have today received a letter from {Mod - name removed} on behalf on {Mod - name removed}. They are saying I have not replied to their letter dated May 19 2017 (I haven't) and things will be passed on to external solicitors...
          21-05-2018, 18:22 PM
        • Reply to Sub Letting Fees
          leaseholder64
          I think the organisation in question is not a managing agent. They make money purely from acting as an agent for the freeholder for ground rent and administration charges. i don't think they manage the property.

          I suspect you have to think long and talk to your MP as it looks like they...
          26-05-2018, 14:58 PM
        • Reply to Sub Letting Fees
          Gordon999
          What is your recommendation if the freehold was sold without Right of First Refusal offer to leaseholders and current freeholder is using a managing agent to demand extortionate subletting fees ?
          26-05-2018, 14:15 PM
        • £150 late penalty fee
          amog78
          Our company has recently been charged £150 late penalty fee for failing to file our accounts on time. The person responsible for this refused to sign our accounts as he had resigned as a Director (although the accounts document had his name on it). The former Director made no attempt to inform anyone...
          21-05-2018, 16:33 PM
        Working...
        X