Sec20 concern

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sec20 concern

    Hi there,

    I am a leaseholder living in a block of 4 leasehold flats. The managing agent carried out maintenance work (fire safety work) earlier this year which totalled just over £1,700. Additionally, there were various call outs for repairs and 2x "Fire Alarm & Emergency Light Services" so all in all the total cost was £2,710. There was no Sec 20 consultation.

    In respect of Sec 20 consultations, I understand that this is needed for qualifying works that will cost a contributing leaseholder more than £250. With regards the £1,700 split 4 ways at £425 each, does this mean I am liable to pay the first £250?

    Many thanks

    #2
    No. Following the Daejan case, you are likely to be liable for at least your share of the cost of doing it with the cheapest competent contractor.

    https://www.lease-advice.org/article...o-freeholders/

    Comment


      #3
      The cheapest quote does not have to be the one accepted, and from quote history, the cheapest is not always the best.



      Comment


        #4
        leaseholder64,

        Thank you for that ruling.

        However, now that I've studied this ruling, given the amount involved, I'm not entirely convinced that I should pay more than £250. Following the landlord's failure to consult, he would have to bear the legal costs of seeking a dispensation from the Tribunal and in furtherance to that, cover my own costs in seeking legal advice on this matter.

        This precedent is much more relevant where the qualifying works have cost in excess of £1,000 per leaseholder in my opinion.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by ram View Post
          The cheapest quote does not have to be the one accepted, and from quote history, the cheapest is not always the best.


          Whilst the cheapest doesn't have to be taken if there is proper consultation, if the consultation is not proper, it may be difficult to prove that a cheaper quote, possibly from someone who wasn't even invited to quote, would not have been chosen if the consultation had occurred.

          Comment


            #6
            This is a debate for another topic ( cheapest quotes )
            I place orders, and I decide who is the best, as leaseholders have not delt with all the firms i deal with, and have no clue how good or bad they are.
            The best firm to do the job is chosen, not the cheapest.
            The feeolder / agent decides the winning bid. not the leaseholders, for reasons above.
            But as said, this is off topic, so I will close.

            Comment


              #7
              Arguably the fire safety work and the maintenance were quite different items of work, hence on balance, I actually dont think its worth falling out with your freeholder over £175 because if you do so they can be very unhelpful when you want something such as a consent. So best advice on this occasion : Cough up!

              Comment


                #8
                Hi there

                Essentially it's the managing agent I have the problem with. This is not an isolated case, they are incompetent and refuse to comply with the law. I am one inch from taking over the Right to Manage with a fellow leaseholder.

                It's not the £175, I can pay this 100x over without batting an eyelid - no smugness intended. It's the principle of these rogue companies that refuse to abide to the basics of law and ride roughshod over leaseholders, many of which are not aware of the law. The only way that they will learn is by hitting them in the pocket and not letting them away with it by coughing up!

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
                  Emilycarter
                  Hi

                  Can a freeholder insist that a Leaseholder contacts the Managing Agent only with matters relating to the property?. We have a Leaseholder who insists on copying us into all communications, (via our personal email addresses and not the freeholder email address) and if the Managing...
                  20-07-2018, 21:15 PM
                • Reply to Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
                  Emilycarter
                  Thank you for your responses. So far there have been no rewards! Just thousands spent on legal fees in getting another Leaseholder to reinstate their flat to a single dwelling and stop letting a room to a family of 5! Our MA always responds within a day, we just feel that the Leaseholder in question...
                  21-07-2018, 13:30 PM
                • 1st Service Demand
                  Seaes56
                  I would like to send out a service charge demand to my neighbours. This is the first time they will have been asked to pay anything for about 30 years. This is a property I inherited which was in a bad state of repair. I am freeholder and the other leaseholder. My neighbours are quite set in their ways...
                  19-07-2018, 19:57 PM
                • Reply to 1st Service Demand
                  leaseholder64
                  Having lots of items that come to exactly the section 20 limit looks very suspicious to me. In particular, I think it might be difficult to argue that communal lighting and garden lighting do not fall under the same section 20 job. That's on a good day. If the tribunal members got out of bed on the...
                  21-07-2018, 11:54 AM
                • Reply to 1st Service Demand
                  leaseholder64
                  The ground rent demand must be a separate document, because there is a very specific format for it, without which the demand is void.

                  Each ground rent year must be demanded separately, as each demand will contain a different date on which the payment was due according to the lease.
                  21-07-2018, 11:38 AM
                • Reply to 1st Service Demand
                  Gordon999
                  I would issue separate demand for annual ground rent because the payment goes to a bank account under freeholder's name. The demand will show the name of freeholder and the address for serving legal notices.

                  The service charge payment should go to separate bank account for holding service...
                  21-07-2018, 10:28 AM
                • Reply to 1st Service Demand
                  andydd
                  Also some of the things you list sound like improvements as opposed to maintenence...
                  21-07-2018, 09:40 AM
                • Reply to 1st Service Demand
                  andydd
                  Seems OK. .whether you can ask for work started but not completed depends on the wording of the leases (s) and whether or not you have incurred an actual costs..be aware that some older leases don't contain any provision for collecting monies in advance and that you must pay for everything and be reimbursed...
                  21-07-2018, 09:38 AM
                • Reply to Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
                  andydd
                  Good question. Ultimately the LH relationship is with you and I don't think there is anything you can do to prevent him contacting you.
                  21-07-2018, 09:34 AM
                • Reply to Leaseholder/freeholder relationships
                  leaseholder64
                  I had trouble parsing the question. I wasn't sure if only referred to the managing agent, or only referred to the type of problem.

                  In the former case, in this forum, AST tenants are often advised to bypass the letting agent, so I don't see why that should not also be true for the long...
                  21-07-2018, 09:34 AM
                Working...
                X