Ground Rent and Service Charge Demands

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ground Rent and Service Charge Demands

    If demands are never received for both ground rent and service charges, are they ever due?

    I read somewhere that they are up to 6 years, if they have been demanded. Is that correct? If they have never been demanded, can I have read somewhere that landlord has up to 18 months to demand?

    Either way, what is the correct and lawful position for a lessee?

    #2
    Ground Rent demands can be (re)served upto 6 years later, beyond this date..no they are not payable.

    The limit for Service Charges is 12years (although some maybe 6 in some circumstances if SC is reserved as rent), the 18 month rule doesnt apply to demands but to notifications that FH has incurred a cost.

    Its explained here - https://www.lease-advice.org/case-st...18-month-rule/
    Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

    I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

    It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

    Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

    Comment


      #3
      I assume you mean never served, rather than never received.

      To be valid, they have to be served properly, according to the terms of the lease, and in the case of ground rent, in a legally prescribed form, and in the case of service charges, accompanied by a legally prescribed statement of rights.

      They become due once the demand is properly served subject to the time limits above.

      Notices that expenditure has been incurred have to be served properly.

      E.g. if you are sub-letting, and have not provided an acceptable service address, other than the property, and the tenant fails to forward the notices, the payment is still due. Proof of posting will also tend to confirm service.

      Comment


        #4
        "Notices that expenditure has been incurred have to be served properly."

        Not quite true..this notice has to be written but can in theory be on the back of a fag packet, its only the actual later demand that has to comply with umpteen rules.
        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

        Comment


          #5
          Does that mean if the agent takes some money from the trust account and you later discover it, they have up to 12 years to demand what they took?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by paulamis View Post
            Does that mean if the agent takes some money from the trust account and you later discover it, they have up to 12 years to demand what they took?
            No. It means you have 12 years in which to require them to return it to the trust account.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks all. In my case, my freeholder does not serve demands for either. I have continued to pay GR, but I cannot pay SC because I do not know how much it is. It is a proportion of the Buildings Insurance and nothing more. I will ask freeholder, as I want to know the building is insured properly.

              Comment


                #8
                The situation with ground rent used to be that you had to pay it, whether demanded or not, so there was a scam, whereby freeholders let it lapse and then made big charges to remedy the situation. Legislation was introduced to counter this, with the result that, unless ground rent is demanded, and that is done in a very specific way, it is not due.

                For service charges, as you say, if you are not told what they are, you cannot reasonably be expected to pay them.

                My original caveats where that the freeholder only needs to use the information they know about you to serve the demands. They are still valid if you hide from them.

                Comment


                  #9
                  In my case, we live in the same building, so no trouble locating me.

                  So, I understand then, that the freeholder has up to 12 years to retrospectively serve the SC demands. In which case, I better open a separate bank account and put money by for this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Only to the extent that they told you that would, eventually, be billed, within the 18 month limit.

                    There are two limits here: there is a statute of limitation on debts relating to contracts made by deeds (12 years) and there a limit in which service charge payers must be made aware of costs for them to be recoverable through the service charge (18 months). Theoretically, they could have incurred a cost 11 years and 11 months ago, and told you about it immediately, but not invoiced you until today.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I finally get it. Thank you.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Yes well explained by leaseholder64, see my post #4, the FH only has to tell you cost incurred within 18 months (note, incurred, normally means the date he actually paid for the service/supplier but there are variations)..this has to be written but doesnt have to follow any set format.

                        And as mentioned he could wait nearly 12 years to actually demand it (this demand must follow specific formats), although the lease may impose other date deadlines, there also are cases where courts/FTT impose the 6 years deadline, either coz its service charges reserved as rent or they were just plain wrong.
                        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

                        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

                        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

                        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • VAT charged twice on work?
                          WAM
                          If a one-off service charge has already had 20% VAT applied by the contractor, can an additional 20% VAT be charged on this total by the managing agent in the service charge schedule (before the fee % has been applied)?

                          I am wondering if this is normal practice or an error.
                          23-05-2019, 15:44 PM
                        • Reply to VAT charged twice on work?
                          WAM
                          Thank you for your response - this is useful information.
                          23-05-2019, 21:24 PM
                        • Reply to VAT charged twice on work?
                          leaseholder64
                          An error; they can only charge VAT on their markup.
                          23-05-2019, 20:31 PM
                        • Freehold sale with 2 leases
                          FSI1315
                          Hello - I own a property that includes the entire freehold and leasehold to one of the 2 flats in the building. (I own the freehold my husband owns the leasehold).

                          I am selling the property with the freehold.

                          My buyer is getting nervous - and so am I about the transfer of the...
                          23-05-2019, 14:33 PM
                        • Reply to Freehold sale with 2 leases
                          FSI1315
                          Thank you so much for your reply. yes we live in the building and have done so for the past 5 years. This is very reassuring.

                          So we don't even have to inflate the cost of the freehold it can be 100£....
                          23-05-2019, 17:55 PM
                        • Reply to Freehold sale with 2 leases
                          DNM2012
                          Your understanding is correct, the other leaseholder will never be able to accept the offer.

                          Do you live in the property as your main residence and have done for more than 12 months? If so you don’t have to offer the right to first refusal anyway.

                          Having said that your solicitor...
                          23-05-2019, 17:02 PM
                        • Right to Manage - Process Questions
                          bigalxyz
                          Hello forum,

                          Very brief summary of my situation. I own a flat (110 years left on the lease) in a big old Victorian house in London. 11 flats in total, all leasehold. Fairly standard stuff.

                          The guy who owns the freehold also does the property management via his own company....
                          23-05-2019, 10:33 AM
                        • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
                          leaseholder64
                          Companies Act 2006 section 303. If they fail to call it, proceed with the following sections.

                          You need 28 days notice for any motion to remove an existing director.
                          23-05-2019, 13:52 PM
                        • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
                          bigalxyz
                          Thank you.

                          Re: number of directors. I may be able to persuade some other leaseholders to do this (or not!). Articles of RMC say "number of directors may be any number not exceeding the number of issued shares" ie any number from 1 to 11. So having 1 director seems to be permissible...
                          23-05-2019, 12:25 PM
                        • Reply to Right to Manage - Process Questions
                          leaseholder64
                          If you actually had an RTM, the freeholder would also have a vote, so your current arrangement gives you more power.

                          A shareholder who cannot attend a meeting can appoint a proxy. It is a criminal offence for the calling notice for the meeting not to point this out.

                          The majority...
                          23-05-2019, 11:11 AM
                        Working...
                        X