Ground Rent and Service Charge Demands

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ground Rent and Service Charge Demands

    If demands are never received for both ground rent and service charges, are they ever due?

    I read somewhere that they are up to 6 years, if they have been demanded. Is that correct? If they have never been demanded, can I have read somewhere that landlord has up to 18 months to demand?

    Either way, what is the correct and lawful position for a lessee?

    #2
    Ground Rent demands can be (re)served upto 6 years later, beyond this date..no they are not payable.

    The limit for Service Charges is 12years (although some maybe 6 in some circumstances if SC is reserved as rent), the 18 month rule doesnt apply to demands but to notifications that FH has incurred a cost.

    Its explained here - https://www.lease-advice.org/case-st...18-month-rule/
    Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

    I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

    It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

    Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

    Comment


      #3
      I assume you mean never served, rather than never received.

      To be valid, they have to be served properly, according to the terms of the lease, and in the case of ground rent, in a legally prescribed form, and in the case of service charges, accompanied by a legally prescribed statement of rights.

      They become due once the demand is properly served subject to the time limits above.

      Notices that expenditure has been incurred have to be served properly.

      E.g. if you are sub-letting, and have not provided an acceptable service address, other than the property, and the tenant fails to forward the notices, the payment is still due. Proof of posting will also tend to confirm service.

      Comment


        #4
        "Notices that expenditure has been incurred have to be served properly."

        Not quite true..this notice has to be written but can in theory be on the back of a fag packet, its only the actual later demand that has to comply with umpteen rules.
        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

        Comment


          #5
          Does that mean if the agent takes some money from the trust account and you later discover it, they have up to 12 years to demand what they took?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by paulamis View Post
            Does that mean if the agent takes some money from the trust account and you later discover it, they have up to 12 years to demand what they took?
            No. It means you have 12 years in which to require them to return it to the trust account.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks all. In my case, my freeholder does not serve demands for either. I have continued to pay GR, but I cannot pay SC because I do not know how much it is. It is a proportion of the Buildings Insurance and nothing more. I will ask freeholder, as I want to know the building is insured properly.

              Comment


                #8
                The situation with ground rent used to be that you had to pay it, whether demanded or not, so there was a scam, whereby freeholders let it lapse and then made big charges to remedy the situation. Legislation was introduced to counter this, with the result that, unless ground rent is demanded, and that is done in a very specific way, it is not due.

                For service charges, as you say, if you are not told what they are, you cannot reasonably be expected to pay them.

                My original caveats where that the freeholder only needs to use the information they know about you to serve the demands. They are still valid if you hide from them.

                Comment


                  #9
                  In my case, we live in the same building, so no trouble locating me.

                  So, I understand then, that the freeholder has up to 12 years to retrospectively serve the SC demands. In which case, I better open a separate bank account and put money by for this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Only to the extent that they told you that would, eventually, be billed, within the 18 month limit.

                    There are two limits here: there is a statute of limitation on debts relating to contracts made by deeds (12 years) and there a limit in which service charge payers must be made aware of costs for them to be recoverable through the service charge (18 months). Theoretically, they could have incurred a cost 11 years and 11 months ago, and told you about it immediately, but not invoiced you until today.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I finally get it. Thank you.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Yes well explained by leaseholder64, see my post #4, the FH only has to tell you cost incurred within 18 months (note, incurred, normally means the date he actually paid for the service/supplier but there are variations)..this has to be written but doesnt have to follow any set format.

                        And as mentioned he could wait nearly 12 years to actually demand it (this demand must follow specific formats), although the lease may impose other date deadlines, there also are cases where courts/FTT impose the 6 years deadline, either coz its service charges reserved as rent or they were just plain wrong.
                        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

                        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

                        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

                        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • transitioning from FTT appointed manager back to RTM
                          poppyfield
                          Hello,

                          Would be extremely grateful for help with this from someone with experience and knowledge of RTM companies:

                          I am a leaseholder in a large (30) block of flats. Up until 4 years ago the building was under RTM management (for about 10 years), but for the last 4 we have...
                          11-02-2019, 06:51 AM
                        • Reply to transitioning from FTT appointed manager back to RTM
                          eagle2
                          The appointment of a good managing agent is very important and will ease the workload of the directors as suggested above. Ideally the directors would carry out due diligence and consider 2 or 3 different managing agents and seek references from directors at other blocks before appointing an agent....
                          16-02-2019, 06:55 AM
                        • Replacing RMC with RTM
                          Centurino
                          In seven days time we have a residents meeting to decide on the future of our apartment blocks; one with nine apartments, one with four apartments, thirteen total. They are about three meters apart physically. Our freeholder liquidated in 2012 and the lender took over as default who then set up an RMC...
                          11-02-2019, 16:11 PM
                        • Reply to Replacing RMC with RTM
                          eagle2
                          When the mortgage company started to claim ground rent from you, did it supply you with proof that it had become the freeholder? If not, I would ask for evidence as you have been unable to confirm with HMLR. It cannot be the “acting freeholder”, the liquidator of the freeholder Company would have...
                          16-02-2019, 06:48 AM
                        • Freeholder duties
                          FreeH1
                          I am trying to sell my flat for which I have a shared freehold with the 2 other flats in the block.

                          Today I have been informed that one of the freeholders is refusing to complete and return the TR1 (and another form I believe is the PR1?). Without this we are unable to continue with the...
                          15-02-2019, 18:49 PM
                        • Reply to Freeholder duties
                          eagle2
                          I would try to have a word with the freeholder who is refusing to complete the forms and find out her reasons. If that does not work, a strongly worded letter from the solicitor stating that you will be seeking compensation should be sent to the freeholder. Actually proving a loss as a result of the...
                          16-02-2019, 06:46 AM
                        • RTM to Management Company
                          jimcarver
                          I purchased a property in January 2018, that was supposedly managed by a RTM company. However, there have been no fees collected and the building insurance has now expired.

                          There are 5 flats in the property and only 2 of us are currently looking to address the issue.

                          My theory...
                          15-02-2019, 02:53 AM
                        • Reply to RTM to Management Company
                          eagle2
                          The directors should be making decisions on behalf of the RTM, so it is important to find out who are those directors. You should have a meeting of all 6 members and decide on the way forward. You may need to appoint new directors for a start. You should also try to understand why 2 members are objecting...
                          16-02-2019, 06:44 AM
                        • Reply to Freeholder duties
                          FreeH1
                          Thank you. I thought I had read that they were obliged to sign.

                          The other owner is happy and willing to complete the forms. There are no issues there. It’s just this one freeholder who doesn’t appear to be willing to complete the forms.

                          If if unable to sell we would lose...
                          16-02-2019, 03:14 AM
                        • Reply to RTM to Management Company
                          jimcarver
                          Thanks for your replies.
                          Sorry if my terminology is confusing or incorrect.
                          When I say and RTM, I mean a collective of the flat owners, when I say management company I mean management agent.

                          I have since made further contact and 4 of the 6 owners (sorry the 5 above was a typo)...
                          16-02-2019, 02:18 AM
                        Working...
                        X