Ground Rent and Service Charge Demands

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ground Rent and Service Charge Demands

    If demands are never received for both ground rent and service charges, are they ever due?

    I read somewhere that they are up to 6 years, if they have been demanded. Is that correct? If they have never been demanded, can I have read somewhere that landlord has up to 18 months to demand?

    Either way, what is the correct and lawful position for a lessee?

    #2
    Ground Rent demands can be (re)served upto 6 years later, beyond this date..no they are not payable.

    The limit for Service Charges is 12years (although some maybe 6 in some circumstances if SC is reserved as rent), the 18 month rule doesnt apply to demands but to notifications that FH has incurred a cost.

    Its explained here - https://www.lease-advice.org/case-st...18-month-rule/
    Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

    I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

    It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

    Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

    Comment


      #3
      I assume you mean never served, rather than never received.

      To be valid, they have to be served properly, according to the terms of the lease, and in the case of ground rent, in a legally prescribed form, and in the case of service charges, accompanied by a legally prescribed statement of rights.

      They become due once the demand is properly served subject to the time limits above.

      Notices that expenditure has been incurred have to be served properly.

      E.g. if you are sub-letting, and have not provided an acceptable service address, other than the property, and the tenant fails to forward the notices, the payment is still due. Proof of posting will also tend to confirm service.

      Comment


        #4
        "Notices that expenditure has been incurred have to be served properly."

        Not quite true..this notice has to be written but can in theory be on the back of a fag packet, its only the actual later demand that has to comply with umpteen rules.
        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

        Comment


          #5
          Does that mean if the agent takes some money from the trust account and you later discover it, they have up to 12 years to demand what they took?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by paulamis View Post
            Does that mean if the agent takes some money from the trust account and you later discover it, they have up to 12 years to demand what they took?
            No. It means you have 12 years in which to require them to return it to the trust account.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks all. In my case, my freeholder does not serve demands for either. I have continued to pay GR, but I cannot pay SC because I do not know how much it is. It is a proportion of the Buildings Insurance and nothing more. I will ask freeholder, as I want to know the building is insured properly.

              Comment


                #8
                The situation with ground rent used to be that you had to pay it, whether demanded or not, so there was a scam, whereby freeholders let it lapse and then made big charges to remedy the situation. Legislation was introduced to counter this, with the result that, unless ground rent is demanded, and that is done in a very specific way, it is not due.

                For service charges, as you say, if you are not told what they are, you cannot reasonably be expected to pay them.

                My original caveats where that the freeholder only needs to use the information they know about you to serve the demands. They are still valid if you hide from them.

                Comment


                  #9
                  In my case, we live in the same building, so no trouble locating me.

                  So, I understand then, that the freeholder has up to 12 years to retrospectively serve the SC demands. In which case, I better open a separate bank account and put money by for this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Only to the extent that they told you that would, eventually, be billed, within the 18 month limit.

                    There are two limits here: there is a statute of limitation on debts relating to contracts made by deeds (12 years) and there a limit in which service charge payers must be made aware of costs for them to be recoverable through the service charge (18 months). Theoretically, they could have incurred a cost 11 years and 11 months ago, and told you about it immediately, but not invoiced you until today.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I finally get it. Thank you.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Yes well explained by leaseholder64, see my post #4, the FH only has to tell you cost incurred within 18 months (note, incurred, normally means the date he actually paid for the service/supplier but there are variations)..this has to be written but doesnt have to follow any set format.

                        And as mentioned he could wait nearly 12 years to actually demand it (this demand must follow specific formats), although the lease may impose other date deadlines, there also are cases where courts/FTT impose the 6 years deadline, either coz its service charges reserved as rent or they were just plain wrong.
                        Advice given is based on my experience representing myself as a leaseholder both in the County Court and at Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.

                        I do not accept any liability to you in relation to the advice given.

                        It is always recommended you seek further advice from a solicitor or legal expert.

                        Always read your lease first, it is the legally binding contract between leaseholder and freeholder.

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • Uninformed manager and directors: what can happen?
                          sophiejo
                          Thank you, leaseholder64, for your help yet again with starting a new topic.

                          I hope I'm not going to sound hysterical, but I am really scared. We have a weird situation in our share-of-freehold set-up: A very intellectually limited real-estate agent, uncouth and ugly to boot, was put in...
                          20-01-2019, 20:27 PM
                        • Reply to Uninformed manager and directors: what can happen?
                          leaseholder64
                          Section 42 almost certainly applies to you. Section 42 of L&T 1987 is for your protection. If the lease doesn't allow for reserve funds, there is really no way you can be forced to contribute. If you are referring to L&T 1987 in general, yes you are largely bound by that Act.

                          ...
                          20-01-2019, 20:58 PM
                        • Signage and Communal Issues
                          Milesunder
                          Hopefully I can get some advice on an issue we are currently having at our development.

                          There are currently 10 properties at our development and these were owned by three friends up until three years ago. They then decided to sale them and 9 different people bought them. Because the previous...
                          03-01-2019, 07:47 AM
                        • Reply to Signage and Communal Issues
                          eagle2
                          It is unclear from your posts how much involvement the management company has at the present time. You also say that you are a director of the management company and refer to an AGM which implies that it remains active.

                          Who has appointed the managing agent? It ought to be the management...
                          20-01-2019, 07:41 AM
                        • Complicated lease extension - neighbour will not sign
                          pkbeney
                          Hello

                          I would be very grateful if somebody could please help me with my problem as it is driving me insane.

                          The situation is quite complicated but please bear with me as it does make sense...

                          In 2009 i purchased a first floor flat in a converted house.
                          At...
                          11-01-2019, 15:18 PM
                        • Reply to Complicated lease extension - neighbour will not sign
                          Macromia
                          I'd agree with this, but would suggest that the most important consideration may be whether or not the OP's solicitors failed to provide the services that they agreed to perform, and were paid for, during the purchase.
                          If the solicitors were negligent (and it sounds like they may have been if...
                          20-01-2019, 04:58 AM
                        • Reply to Complicated lease extension - neighbour will not sign
                          chris1544
                          What happened after he inspected your property? The reason I’m asking about this is that if it were me, I would be doing everything I could to get him to sign voluntarily first. It would seem that whatever happened in the past and whatever your solicitor or any other can do now, free or not, is reliant...
                          19-01-2019, 22:39 PM
                        • Reply to Signage and Communal Issues
                          Lawcruncher
                          If the sign was put up by the original landlord then it belongs to the current landlord as it is part of the property (in fact it probably is anyway). No tenant can object to it (a) if it was there before the leases were granted simply, because it was there before the leases were granted (b) if it was...
                          19-01-2019, 21:42 PM
                        • Illegal Alteration
                          puckxxx
                          Guys if you could give some advise on the following query it would be much appreciated.

                          I understand that a breach of a leasehold agreement needs to be determined by the FTT. Therefore my question implies a decision in my favour.

                          Do any of you know how much a Landlord can reasonably...
                          18-01-2019, 12:08 PM
                        • Reply to Illegal Alteration
                          JK0
                          Have you accepted ground rent/ service charge since becoming aware of the alterations?
                          19-01-2019, 19:01 PM
                        Working...
                        X