S20 Application to miss due to time constrains

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    S20 Application to miss due to time constrains

    For some work carried out on my Block the Man Co stated they were going to apply to short circuit the S20 procedure as the works were urgent. As nobody in the Block has any S20 documentation how can I find out if the FTT allowed the S20 to be missed? I have asked but the Man Co doesn't reply to those types of requests.

    The FTT should invite all the leaseholders to join in the case, so you should have been made aware if the FTT was actually involved. As the FTT process, itself, takes time, they may be doing it in parallel, or may have decided only to do it retrospectively, if challenged.

    The general policy on such cases seems to be that the FTT expects the lessor to do as much consultation as possible, in the time available. Going silent on you seems a good way to lose their case.


      OK, 2013 I have an email stating they were going to withdraw their S20 Dispensation Application for the works as the timescale was too short but no other paperwork. Neither S20 or Dispensation Authority if the Man Co don't reply can I apply to the FTT (LVT as was) and will they tell me if an Application was received or do I have to Lodge a Full Service Charge Review Application (or whatever it is called).

      Works were started 2015 complete later 2015 if that makes a difference.


        I don't know for certain, but I suspect only the lessor knows for certain, so the only way that going through an FTT would help is that they this information would be volunteered to them, as part of the defence, if there had been a successful application.

        I think it is quite common that applications to dispense are made retrospectively.

        Why do you think you have lost out? They will win if they can demonstrate that:
        - the job was needed, and was urgent;
        - they made a best effort to consult;
        - the resulting cost to you was as good as you would have expected in the circumstances, on the basis of the best long term outcome.

        You wouldn't get a dispensation authority if they withdrew the application.


          I am a bit perplexed. If they can get retrospective S20 why bother at all? If they can show they intended to get the best quote and didn't bother just picked a name out of the hat as it were, they would provide a number of higher quotes to justify not getting the "cheapest". Whereas the Tenants havn't been offered the opportunity to show a cheaper/ better alternative. How can the FTT know if the actual firm doing the Works is not somehow linked to the Man Co?

          The job was needed and was urgent, it was fire protection that should have been installed when the building was first built but wasn't (10 years or so). It was so urgent the Man Co decided to apply for a dispensation from the S20 in 2012 and then again to not apply for the dispensation in 2013 and finally get round to doing the job in 2015. Which part of the Man Cos action showed urgency? They made no effort at all to consult other than a reply to my email asking if they received the Dispensation.

          Apologies for the rant.


            It is the dispensation that is retrospective. Full dispensation is only possible if there was a real emergency. Otherwise they may get a dispensation based on evidence of what price might have been achieved if there had been a full consultation. Originally there was only the first option, but then there was Daejan v Benson case: https://www.lease-advice.org/article...o-freeholders/


              Actually I'm interested in your particular reason for urgency. My feeling would be that it would be difficult to argue that dispensation was needed given when the fire risk assessment should have been done. Even then the Daejan case might apply.

              I would only challenge it if you are certain you overpaid as a result of the consultation failure.


                " I have asked but the Man Co doesn't reply to those types of requests."

                I had one like that, start every conversation with a request to make a formal complaint.


                  Forgetting the dispensation part, did you get the 2 or 3 stage S20 notification that the works needed to be done, and the 2nd stage saying who the quotes were from, and how much the works would cost ?


                  Latest Activity


                  • Ground Rent Term 2 question

                    I've been reading this forum for quite some time and found it to be REALLY useful. We have 4 houses which we rent out, so thanks for all the posts.

                    I thought I would ask my first question as I have googled this and can't find anything.

                    One of our properties...
                    21-04-2018, 13:08 PM
                  • RTM Handover
                    We have set up a RTM company and took over the management of the block from 1 April 2018. (mid accounting year 01.01.2018 - 31.12.2018).

                    The old management company has today supplied a reconciliation of the expenditure spent to date and the balance of the advance service charges they will...
                    20-04-2018, 20:09 PM
                  • Reply to RTM Handover
                    Understandable about the surveyor. Worse case scenario I will need to communicate with the leaseholders that it is a liability that is due based on contracts entered into by the prior management and is due for payment.

                    Hopefully they will pay it directly to the RTM to save some hassle...
                    21-04-2018, 11:15 AM
                  • Reply to RTM Handover
                    The leaseholders only have a right to demand accountant certified accounts, not audited ones.

                    10% is cheap for project management and health and safety overview of a contractor.

                    No surveyor is going to enter in to a contract to specify work and procure contractors if the client...
                    21-04-2018, 09:44 AM
                  • Maintainence fees - no sink fund
                    Hi i have an issue in relation to maintainace fees.

                    Mr Mrs is in the process of trying to sell her Flat. She moved in 8 years ago when her building was converted into 10 flats by the freeholders. During that time she has paid a yearly maintiance fee of £850. The freeholders manage the...
                    20-04-2018, 16:20 PM
                  • Reply to Maintainence fees - no sink fund
                    Management companies are not required to produce audited accounts for either the service charge trust or the company itself. They can produce the company accounts all on their own, and, for 10 flats, any statutory service charge accounts only needs to be certified by a qualified accountant, not audited....
                    21-04-2018, 09:20 AM
                  • service charge based on rateable values
                    I own a leasehold flat in a building of 4 flats - different sizes, mine is the smallest-almost a studio flat (3 leasehold flats + 1 freeholder’s flat).
                    Since I bought the flat the freeholder has been calculating the service charge by simply dividing the costs four ways.
                    Very recently...
                    20-04-2018, 10:40 AM
                  • Reply to service charge based on rateable values
                    So basically the service charge is now apportioned A 25%, B 25% C25% and D25% and you think this is not fair according to the lease .

                    And you may want to change to % proportional to floor area to say A28% . B28% , C 28% and D16%

                    or if you want to change the % related...
                    21-04-2018, 05:09 AM
                  • Long Leasehold and Gas/Electricity
                    Can I ask a question please? I own a number of Freehold houses on 999 year leases. One was found to be derelict and the court gave me possession but it had a gas/electricity meter in there. When the leaseholder stopped paying the energy company did a land registry search and then put the account in...
                    20-04-2018, 17:10 PM
                  • Reply to Long Leasehold and Gas/Electricity
                    Wrong - the houses must be leasehold if on 999 years leases.

                    You should consult a solicitor and charge the solicitor's bill as an expense to your rental income from other houses .

                    Any meter bill should be paid by the registered named account holder . ...
                    21-04-2018, 02:47 AM