Deposit protection from exactly When?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Deposit protection from exactly When?

    I hear now that the deposit must be registered from 14 days from any first payment received from the tenant. Does that mean that if the prospective tenant pays, say a weeks rent to hold the property, you must register it?

    Hope not, please someone clarify, thank you
    Alan

  • #2
    Originally posted by ohdearme View Post
    I hear now that the deposit must be registered from 14 days from any first payment received from the tenant.
    Has always been the case since deposits must be protected.

    Originally posted by ohdearme View Post
    Does that mean that if the prospective tenant pays, say a weeks rent to hold the property, you must register it?
    No since this holding deposit is not a security deposit for an actual tenancy.


    Are you a letting agent?

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes.

      Sorry the answer confusing, one says it has always been, sound like yes, the other says no.
      My understanding was that any preliminary or holding monies were not considered deposit for the purposes of deposit law and the yes answer seemed to be the one.

      Help always appreciated.
      Alan

      Comment


      • #4
        A Holding Deposit and a Tenancy Deposit are 2 different things. A Tencncy does not commence until the tenant takes possession, therefore a tenancy deposit can not exist before the commencement of the tenancy.

        The current law is that a Holding Deposit does not need protection, once it becomes a Tenancy Deposit it needs protecting within 14 days.

        The Localism Act will extend that to 30 days - but the penalties for non-compliance will change too.

        Comment


        • #5
          Holding deposits are not tenancy deposits in the sense of the Housing Act 2004, so do not need protecting.

          I am not convinced that a tenancy deposit only becomes so when the tenancy begins, though.

          Comment


          • #6
            How can it be a tenancy deposit when there is no tenancy?

            Gladehurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi limited section 214 claims to existing tenancies. I accept that case goes out of the window with the 2012 Act but that acto only incorporates "Tenancies that have ended" (ie have already existed and so continue to be relevant).

            Comment


            • #7
              In my view, there can be a tenancy deposit before the tenancy starts because it is a deposit received in "connection to a shorthold tenancy" and for the defined purpose.

              However, indeed one is only "the landlord" during the tenancy. (Gladehurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi limited relied on this)

              I find the drafting of s.213 confusing:
              (1)Any tenancy deposit paid to a person in connection with a shorthold tenancy must, as from the time when it is received, be dealt with in accordance with an authorised scheme.
              As per above, I would think this could happen before the tenancy begins.

              But
              (4)For the purposes of this section “the initial requirements” of an authorised scheme are such requirements imposed by the scheme as fall to be complied with by a landlord on receiving such a tenancy deposit.
              This can only occur once the tenancy has begun.

              So probably nothing to do until tenancy begins.

              Comment


              • #8
                Many thanks to you, I am ironically rather pleased that it is not that clear, so perhaps trouble maker tenants will keep their distance.

                Best

                Alan

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ohdearme View Post
                  Many thanks to you, I am ironically rather pleased that it is not that clear, so perhaps trouble maker tenants will keep their distance.
                  The unclarity, especially once the Localism Act comes into effect, means there will be lots of claims against landlords/agents with tenants attempting to assert their understanding of the law. Does it really make them troublemakers if their understanding of a complex issue is different to yours (especially as you don't know if your version is right!)? The 2004 Act didn't gain clarity until cases like Draycott, Tiensa, Gladehurst and Honeysuckle made it as far as the appeal court - and they were 3-4 years after enactment. Three to four years of uncertainty in a business that has a difficult enough job to convince it's customers that everything is above board. That doesn't sound good to me.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I also had noted that some sub-sections of section 213 refer to "the person" and some to "the landlord" and decided not to bother trying to work out if it was significant. If subsections (3) and (5) are taken literally then no action would need to be taken if the landlord's agent never hands the deposit to the landlord - I cannot think that that can be the intention.

                    As for sub-section (1) I think we could get into convoluted arguments if we start talking about tenancies not existing when payment is made. I think keep it simple and start counting from the day the tenant pays. With 30 days soon available to effect protection there should be no problem in practice if you are taking the deposit no more than a week before the tenancy is scheduled to begin.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                      As for sub-section (1) I think we could get into convoluted arguments if we start talking about tenancies not existing when payment is made. I think keep it simple and start counting from the day the tenant pays. With 30 days soon available to effect protection there should be no problem in practice if you are taking the deposit no more than a week before the tenancy is scheduled to begin.
                      I guess it is of more interest to the agents and landlords who are taking student deposits in Jan/Feb/Mar ready for Aug/Sep tenancies.
                      I can take no responsibility for the use of any free comments given, any actions taken are the sole decision of the individual in question after consideration of my free comments.

                      That also means I cannot share in any profits from any decisions made!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Phlash View Post
                        I guess it is of more interest to the agents and landlords who are taking student deposits in Jan/Feb/Mar ready for Aug/Sep tenancies.
                        I think the approach here has to be to ask what mischief the provisions are intended to prevent. If you do that then I think the "common sense" approach has to be that at the very least the clock starts to tick when there is a commitment because even if the tenancy does not start immediately obligations arise.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                          I think the approach here has to be to ask what mischief the provisions are intended to prevent. If you do that then I think the "common sense" approach has to be that at the very least the clock starts to tick when there is a commitment because even if the tenancy does not start immediately obligations arise.
                          I agree. In the above examples we simply protect the deposit upon receipt of the monies into our protected client account.

                          Those agencies not using client accounts and segregated monies will be under even more scrutiny as well I should think.
                          I can take no responsibility for the use of any free comments given, any actions taken are the sole decision of the individual in question after consideration of my free comments.

                          That also means I cannot share in any profits from any decisions made!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Phlash View Post

                            Those agencies not using client accounts and segregated monies will be under even more scrutiny as well I should think.
                            Not a bad thing, either.
                            'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Phlash View Post
                              In the above examples we simply protect the deposit upon receipt of the monies into our protected client account.
                              But that's not the same thing as 'protection' through a deposit protection scheme.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Breakdown of LA costs...
                                Landlord1206
                                As a LL am I able to insist on seeing the breakdown of costs each quarterly bill?
                                We appointed a new Agent to manage the property and now only get one figure on the bill to be paid. Before we received a full breakdown of each item such as gardenng, lighting, insurance, postage etc
                                They...
                                20-08-2017, 17:49 PM
                              • Reply to Breakdown of LA costs...
                                HantsAgent
                                Is this an agency managing a single residential property in which you have a tenant? Or is it an agent looking after the leasehold for a block of flats?
                                21-08-2017, 10:06 AM
                              • Agent asking for funds prior to sign the contract
                                JustIgnore
                                Good afternoon.

                                I am in a bit of confusion at the moment in dealing with an agent, I hope you guys can help.

                                I have found a property to rent and we are very interested in renting it.
                                The advertised move in date is somewhere end of August, an exact date has not been given...
                                19-08-2017, 12:59 PM
                              • Reply to Agent asking for funds prior to sign the contract
                                Stef Cooke
                                Really? All of the agents and LLs I work for ask for monies up front and do not get ASTs signed, or release keys, prior to funds having cleared.

                                I accept my 'reason' may be flawed... I am not an agent or a LL, but the reality still is that monies (some or all) are cleared prior to ASTs...
                                21-08-2017, 09:56 AM
                              • Reply to Breakdown of LA costs...
                                Landlord1206
                                I meant Managing Agent...
                                20-08-2017, 17:51 PM
                              • Reply to Agent asking for funds prior to sign the contract
                                jjlandlord
                                It is not uncommon but this should not be: You should set up the contract first.

                                I also got as 'reason' what is mentioned in the previous comment, namely that you have to pay first because of the wording of the contract... This simply either mean that they are clueless or have a badly drafted...
                                19-08-2017, 17:52 PM
                              • Reply to Agent asking for funds prior to sign the contract
                                Stef Cooke
                                Yes. As a clerk I am occasionally called off a job because funds have not cleared.

                                If you think about it that contract will contain information about the monies you will pay, deposit etc. If you have not already paid then the contract is incorrect. So you pay, then, when it has cleared,...
                                19-08-2017, 13:47 PM
                              • Looking for a new letting agent
                                12GuageLandlord
                                Hello,

                                I am new to this forum and to the private rental market. Having just gone through a fairly turbulent contract renewal I have lost all patience with my management agent and have decided I want to move away from them as every communication from them creates more work for me putting...
                                10-08-2017, 21:35 PM
                              • Reply to Looking for a new letting agent
                                tatemono
                                this is exactly why I recommended it as a question to ask. You should know that the agent works for you on your terms and so if this isn't something you want and the LA insists on it and has hefty fees, you can walk away. You can play ignorant and see if they try to pull the wool over your eyes by saying...
                                14-08-2017, 21:15 PM
                              Working...
                              X