Deposit protection from exactly When?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Deposit protection from exactly When?

    I hear now that the deposit must be registered from 14 days from any first payment received from the tenant. Does that mean that if the prospective tenant pays, say a weeks rent to hold the property, you must register it?

    Hope not, please someone clarify, thank you
    Alan

    #2
    Originally posted by ohdearme View Post
    I hear now that the deposit must be registered from 14 days from any first payment received from the tenant.
    Has always been the case since deposits must be protected.

    Originally posted by ohdearme View Post
    Does that mean that if the prospective tenant pays, say a weeks rent to hold the property, you must register it?
    No since this holding deposit is not a security deposit for an actual tenancy.


    Are you a letting agent?

    Comment


      #3
      Yes.

      Sorry the answer confusing, one says it has always been, sound like yes, the other says no.
      My understanding was that any preliminary or holding monies were not considered deposit for the purposes of deposit law and the yes answer seemed to be the one.

      Help always appreciated.
      Alan

      Comment


        #4
        A Holding Deposit and a Tenancy Deposit are 2 different things. A Tencncy does not commence until the tenant takes possession, therefore a tenancy deposit can not exist before the commencement of the tenancy.

        The current law is that a Holding Deposit does not need protection, once it becomes a Tenancy Deposit it needs protecting within 14 days.

        The Localism Act will extend that to 30 days - but the penalties for non-compliance will change too.

        Comment


          #5
          Holding deposits are not tenancy deposits in the sense of the Housing Act 2004, so do not need protecting.

          I am not convinced that a tenancy deposit only becomes so when the tenancy begins, though.

          Comment


            #6
            How can it be a tenancy deposit when there is no tenancy?

            Gladehurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi limited section 214 claims to existing tenancies. I accept that case goes out of the window with the 2012 Act but that acto only incorporates "Tenancies that have ended" (ie have already existed and so continue to be relevant).

            Comment


              #7
              In my view, there can be a tenancy deposit before the tenancy starts because it is a deposit received in "connection to a shorthold tenancy" and for the defined purpose.

              However, indeed one is only "the landlord" during the tenancy. (Gladehurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi limited relied on this)

              I find the drafting of s.213 confusing:
              (1)Any tenancy deposit paid to a person in connection with a shorthold tenancy must, as from the time when it is received, be dealt with in accordance with an authorised scheme.
              As per above, I would think this could happen before the tenancy begins.

              But
              (4)For the purposes of this section “the initial requirements” of an authorised scheme are such requirements imposed by the scheme as fall to be complied with by a landlord on receiving such a tenancy deposit.
              This can only occur once the tenancy has begun.

              So probably nothing to do until tenancy begins.

              Comment


                #8
                Many thanks to you, I am ironically rather pleased that it is not that clear, so perhaps trouble maker tenants will keep their distance.

                Best

                Alan

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by ohdearme View Post
                  Many thanks to you, I am ironically rather pleased that it is not that clear, so perhaps trouble maker tenants will keep their distance.
                  The unclarity, especially once the Localism Act comes into effect, means there will be lots of claims against landlords/agents with tenants attempting to assert their understanding of the law. Does it really make them troublemakers if their understanding of a complex issue is different to yours (especially as you don't know if your version is right!)? The 2004 Act didn't gain clarity until cases like Draycott, Tiensa, Gladehurst and Honeysuckle made it as far as the appeal court - and they were 3-4 years after enactment. Three to four years of uncertainty in a business that has a difficult enough job to convince it's customers that everything is above board. That doesn't sound good to me.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I also had noted that some sub-sections of section 213 refer to "the person" and some to "the landlord" and decided not to bother trying to work out if it was significant. If subsections (3) and (5) are taken literally then no action would need to be taken if the landlord's agent never hands the deposit to the landlord - I cannot think that that can be the intention.

                    As for sub-section (1) I think we could get into convoluted arguments if we start talking about tenancies not existing when payment is made. I think keep it simple and start counting from the day the tenant pays. With 30 days soon available to effect protection there should be no problem in practice if you are taking the deposit no more than a week before the tenancy is scheduled to begin.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                      As for sub-section (1) I think we could get into convoluted arguments if we start talking about tenancies not existing when payment is made. I think keep it simple and start counting from the day the tenant pays. With 30 days soon available to effect protection there should be no problem in practice if you are taking the deposit no more than a week before the tenancy is scheduled to begin.
                      I guess it is of more interest to the agents and landlords who are taking student deposits in Jan/Feb/Mar ready for Aug/Sep tenancies.
                      I can take no responsibility for the use of any free comments given, any actions taken are the sole decision of the individual in question after consideration of my free comments.

                      That also means I cannot share in any profits from any decisions made!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Phlash View Post
                        I guess it is of more interest to the agents and landlords who are taking student deposits in Jan/Feb/Mar ready for Aug/Sep tenancies.
                        I think the approach here has to be to ask what mischief the provisions are intended to prevent. If you do that then I think the "common sense" approach has to be that at the very least the clock starts to tick when there is a commitment because even if the tenancy does not start immediately obligations arise.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                          I think the approach here has to be to ask what mischief the provisions are intended to prevent. If you do that then I think the "common sense" approach has to be that at the very least the clock starts to tick when there is a commitment because even if the tenancy does not start immediately obligations arise.
                          I agree. In the above examples we simply protect the deposit upon receipt of the monies into our protected client account.

                          Those agencies not using client accounts and segregated monies will be under even more scrutiny as well I should think.
                          I can take no responsibility for the use of any free comments given, any actions taken are the sole decision of the individual in question after consideration of my free comments.

                          That also means I cannot share in any profits from any decisions made!

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Phlash View Post

                            Those agencies not using client accounts and segregated monies will be under even more scrutiny as well I should think.
                            Not a bad thing, either.
                            'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Phlash View Post
                              In the above examples we simply protect the deposit upon receipt of the monies into our protected client account.
                              But that's not the same thing as 'protection' through a deposit protection scheme.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Am I locked in to agency fees?
                                SaurfLondonLad
                                I am just coming to the end of my first year of being a LL on a property which I self manage. My tenants are great and I now wish to ditch my agent to save them and me money and collect the rent myself. The agent's contract does clearly state that fees are liable for as long as the tenant resides. This...
                                15-01-2018, 20:02 PM
                              • Reply to Am I locked in to agency fees?
                                jpkeates
                                Don't lie to the agent - they're not (that) stupid, and then you would owe them the fees if they claimed them.

                                I'd try and negotiate a deal - for most businesses a large chunk of income today is worth more than the promise of income month by month.

                                The agent's business model...
                                16-01-2018, 09:24 AM
                              • Reply to Am I locked in to agency fees?
                                ash72
                                I'm sure a large lettings agency like foxton's doesn't want bad publicity and will be happy with a negotiated pay off, I would just stress that they are virtually doing nothing, only collecting the rent, which if it is a S/O then it's simple. Just out of interest if they are charging you 12% for not...
                                15-01-2018, 23:00 PM
                              • Reply to Am I locked in to agency fees?
                                SaurfLondonLad
                                Thanks Ash, at present they collect the rent but I hope to do all myself, I will talk to the agency but signs are they will not budge. I have also considered terminating and new contracting the tenants, but under law surely they are still residing. I think the terms of the contract are unfair but given...
                                15-01-2018, 22:13 PM
                              • Reply to Am I locked in to agency fees?
                                ash72
                                My advice is that if you talk with the agency and try to get out the contract or you pay them off at a mutually agreed amount (to compensate them, unfortunately).

                                Do they only offer you the service of collecting the rent each month? Are they the ones who hold the deposit as well, or did...
                                15-01-2018, 21:45 PM
                              • Reply to Am I locked in to agency fees?
                                RedHitman
                                You self manage a property but also have an agent?
                                If you’re managing the property, what is the agency doing?
                                15-01-2018, 21:37 PM
                              • Letting agent unhelpful in getting unpaid rent
                                flyer22
                                Hi all, my first post here, although I have been a Landlord for 5 years, I need some advice from more seasoned landlords.
                                The last tenant moved in 6 months ago and not paid rent since. Apart from the deposit and first month rent, no money received. The property is fully managed by the LA who also...
                                14-01-2018, 22:43 PM
                              • Reply to Letting agent unhelpful in getting unpaid rent
                                jpkeates
                                You need to complain and go through the complete process (and get an unsatisfactory result) before the TPO will get involved.

                                The letting agent is not correct about the Data Protection Act meaning that they can't give you the tenant's data.
                                Refer them to the Information Commissioner's...
                                15-01-2018, 14:19 PM
                              • Reply to Letting agent unhelpful in getting unpaid rent
                                flyer22
                                Thanks for your responses guys. First, sacking the agent is without a doubt. I am not renting the property and I decided to put it on the market for sale, yes it was the tipping point for me. I won't let their sales anywhere near selling the property either.
                                I would be entitled to all of the deposit,...
                                15-01-2018, 13:37 PM
                              • Reply to Letting agent unhelpful in getting unpaid rent
                                theartfullodger
                                And start letting agent redress scheme complaint process:
                                https://england.shelter.org.uk/housi...edress_schemes
                                Which requires you to go through the letting agent's complaints process 1st.


                                Can I just check, this is not some "guaranteed Rent" scheme/scam is it?...
                                15-01-2018, 11:22 AM
                              Working...
                              X