Please can I invite some opinions on the issues below. As a landlord I am about to re-let my flat to a new tenant found by "Toy" Townends letting agents. I am having concerns about this letting agency who are new to me.
"Toy" Townends view is that they want to do all the reference checks on the tenant but they do not want to disclose the results of these checks to me as the landlord ( checks include previous landlord, current employer, current bank ). I think this is very odd and I am reluctant to allow the letting to go ahead unless I see sight of these checks. Who is right?
I specifically want to know the tenants bank details since , in the case of tenant default, I can potentially seek a garnishee/third party debt order. I am happy to give the tenant my bank details. "Toy" Townends are very reluctant to comply and they don't want to give me the tenant's bank details. Who is right?
I want to issue a 'no fault s21 notice' at the start of the tenancy with an expiry date matching the end of the tenancy. "Toy" Townends think this is very unusual and prejudicial. My view is that it prevents the agreement becoming a statutory periodic tenancy on expiry. Who is right?
"Toy" Townends view is that they want to do all the reference checks on the tenant but they do not want to disclose the results of these checks to me as the landlord ( checks include previous landlord, current employer, current bank ). I think this is very odd and I am reluctant to allow the letting to go ahead unless I see sight of these checks. Who is right?
I specifically want to know the tenants bank details since , in the case of tenant default, I can potentially seek a garnishee/third party debt order. I am happy to give the tenant my bank details. "Toy" Townends are very reluctant to comply and they don't want to give me the tenant's bank details. Who is right?
I want to issue a 'no fault s21 notice' at the start of the tenancy with an expiry date matching the end of the tenancy. "Toy" Townends think this is very unusual and prejudicial. My view is that it prevents the agreement becoming a statutory periodic tenancy on expiry. Who is right?
Comment