Minor flood damage caused by tenant

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Minor flood damage caused by tenant

    Hi guys,

    My tenant decided it was a good idea to leave her young daughter in the shower unsupervised and the little girl decided to play with the shower head, all over the floor tiles. Needless to say, the water has damaged the flat below's ceiling and light fitting. Damages come to about £200 and my tenant has already admitted that the water was not due to a leak of any sort, and that it was her daughter that sprayed all the water on the floor.

    Now, I would have thought that the block buildings insurance policy would cover the ceiling damage to the downstairs flat but my managing agents tell me that it only covers the communal and external areas of the building (not sure if that is true).

    My question to you knowledgeable folk is, is it my responsibility to pay for the downstairs flat's damage even though it has been established that my tenants upstairs negligence has caused the water damage?

    Hope to hear from you all soon.

    Thanks.

  • #2
    Yeah, you should compensate the neighbour, and then withhold that amount from the tenant's deposit when they leave.

    Comment


    • #3
      First off, the block buildings insurance policy should cover any aspect of the building whether internal or external which would include walls, ceilings, fixtures, fittings, etc. Your managing agent telling you it only covers the communal and external areas of the building would certainly ring alarm bells with me. I would hope they are wrong as where else would all these things be covered?!

      With a repair bill of £200 I would probably not even look at the claim route as for a start there will probably be an excess to pay on a claim which could be more than £200 anyway!

      The bill, in my personal opinion, should surely be the tenant's responsibility and not yours. If the tenant has taken out tenants contents insurance, their may be an extension within it that is called tenant's liability which should cover any injury or damage they cause to other people and their property. Once again this may have an excess applicable but as it is not your responsibility then this is not your concern.

      This is, like I say, just my personal view on the situation. It may be an option to consider JK0's idea about paying the bill yourself just get it sorted ASAP but I think I would be looking to recuperate this amount from the tenant as soon as I could rather than withholding it from the deposit when they leave. My reason for this is, what if something else happens that you need that deposit for and also you are going to be out of pocket until they do leave.

      Good luck with whatever you choose to do!
      Steve Smith - Company Director at a leading Landlord Insurance broker with 17+ years experience in the industry
      LandlordZONE Verified Poster and Topic Expert for Landlords Insurance since 2009
      See my profile for contact details

      Comment


      • #4
        Steve

        Again relevant to my question posed on the other "leak" thread (see above or below as the case might be) - I agree that (as per our lease) the freeholder is obliged to insure *all* parts of the property, but surely this can't be expected to cover negligence (whether through allowing a child to spray water or not to maintain pipework internal to the leaseholder's property)

        Ancillary question: even if the damage was in theory insured by the freeholder, what would be the case if the excess was such that it was effectively *not* covered? Would the freeholder have to pay or could freeholder claim from leaseholder at fault?

        Thanks very much


        A

        Comment


        • #5
          This is all to do with legal/lease issues and as mentioned before, not my strong point!

          The lease should dictate who is responsible for repairs/maintainance of certain parts of the property. If that party is not insured for the damage (whether un-insured, less than excess amount, etc.) then it would have to come out of their own pocket.

          If such damage can be proved to be caused by a separate party's negligence, then a claim could be made against them. It is possible that the negligent party may be covered for such negligence by a liability insurance policy (either separate policy or within a buildings insurance).
          Steve Smith - Company Director at a leading Landlord Insurance broker with 17+ years experience in the industry
          LandlordZONE Verified Poster and Topic Expert for Landlords Insurance since 2009
          See my profile for contact details

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ashburnham View Post
            The bill, in my personal opinion, should surely be the tenant's responsibility and not yours.
            I quite agree.
            T caused damage to a third party's property, you should stay out of it.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Freeholder wants to change condition on lease renewal
              John Youngs
              I am in the process of purchasing a new 125 year lease on a BTL flat. The current lease says that in the event of a rebuild of the block being necessary the freeholder will pay any shortfall between the insured value & the rebuilding costs. The new lease removes this liability so only the insured...
              19-08-2017, 12:05 PM
            • Reply to Freeholder wants to change condition on lease renewal
              John Youngs
              Thanks for the reply.

              The lease is down to 56 years, the new one will be 125.

              The current valuation for rebuilding is £7m & insurance is £10m so is ok now. But I wondered what incentive there is for freeholder to keep this up to date. perhaps what you say about adequate...
              19-08-2017, 14:12 PM
            • Reply to Freeholder wants to change condition on lease renewal
              leaseholder64
              Are you renewing because the lease is about to expire, or are you doing so in order to extend one that has at least 21 years to run.

              In the latter case, you extend by exactly 90 years, and change the rent to one peppercorn per year (which will not, in practice, be demanded), without other...
              19-08-2017, 13:18 PM
            • Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              I have trawled the internet etc. and made some phone calls but as soon as I mention the fact that the boundary wall in our front garden has developed cracks, we are refused cover.

              We have done some investigating and suspect that the cause of the cracks on the boundary wall is a large tree...
              08-08-2017, 06:49 AM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              Agreed. I found that out when shopping around before renewal with the existing insurer. Good job I did not tell the existing insurer where to go in a fit of pique....
              08-08-2017, 17:55 PM
            • Insurance shot up due to water leaks from upstairs.
              Flashback1966
              I have an irresponsible landlord upstairs. Twice, the ceiling has fallen due to a water leak.

              The council are useless and gave no help.

              My insurance has gone up, as I have had two claims during recent years.

              Is there anything I can do about this? Can the upstairs...
              08-08-2017, 15:53 PM
            • Reply to Insurance shot up due to water leaks from upstairs.
              JK0
              What did you expect if you claimed on insurance rather than sued the guy?
              08-08-2017, 16:23 PM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Flashback1966
              I don't understand why you did n't make a claim under the current insurance?

              I had a similar situation with a front garden wall, was leaning. The insurance company sent a surveyor at no cost to me.

              Whilst the house had strong foundation and was n't impacted by subsidence....
              08-08-2017, 15:48 PM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              JK0
              I believe you are over thinking this. You definitely want your existing policy to continue, as this will likely be the only firm who will insure for subsidence at a reasonable cost in the future. Also, I would not like to try to claim on your old policy if you have stopped it in favour of someone e...
              08-08-2017, 10:09 AM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              We shopped around a bit when our existing insurer gave us the renewal quote and terms. We could not (at that time) find any other insurer that would offer us an all-inclusive policy. They either declined to insure us or offered to insure us on FLEA terms so we grudgingly renewed on FLEA terms with our...
              08-08-2017, 09:57 AM
            Working...
            X