Sharing buildings insurance

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sharing buildings insurance

    Hi there, i'm wondering if anyone can help me. I bought the freehold of a terraced house some time ago which is split into 2 flats. I have 2 floors and another freeholder has one floor. Since living there he has always stipulated the split of our shared buildings insurance to be 75% paid by myself and 25% by him which I have paid over the years despite it sounding unfair given that the flat is more generally split 66% - 33%. Is this a reasonable way to split the costs?

    I spoke to our insurers and they suggested the 66% - 33% split was how it should be done and paid up. His management company paid up before clearing with him and he is now demanding the money back from the insurers which will leave the policy voided. Do I have any legal standing where his payments are concerned? He is a very awkward character and is always trying to shirk his responsibilities, I have explained things fully to him as has the insurance company. It would be good to get some advice on where I stand and would be greatly appreciated.

  • #2
    The way in which it is split should be set out in your lease. it may be fixed share a 1/3 or 66% or a fair proportion.

    As the freeholder you most usually have to insure the building and recover the cost under the lease. In that case the insurer should not be refunding any money, they have been paid their premium, how you and your leaseholders divvy it up are up to you.

    What does your lease say? That's the starting point.

    If it is not fixed then the usual way is on floor area of the units with a slight weighting to the renewal costs of fixtures and fittings in the smaller flat, and any other circumstances.
    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks a lot for the reply, i'll have to dig the lease out and check the smallprint.

      "If it is not fixed then the usual way is on floor area of the units with a slight weighting to the renewal costs of fixtures and fittings in the smaller flat, and any other circumstances."

      I'm wondering if you know of a specific guide detailing how to breakdown the costs or is it something expensively discussed by solicitors when two parties cannot agree.

      Comment


      • #4
        No there is no guide it is a matter of expertise which surveyors are trained to assess. But focus on the lease, this may be irrelevant if the proportions are fixed,


        There is no small print ( literal or otherwise) in leases, it is ALL relevant.
        Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

        Comment


        • #5
          I've had a look in the lease and there's nothing in the paperwork mentioning it. The lease actually pertains to a contract between Westminster council and a previous owner who bought it from the council as one unit. At some point the place was split into 2 flats and sold to 2 separate people and I bought the freehold from one of those people. The lease I received upon purchase mentions nothing about the fact that the building is split between 2 owners and only mentions the insurance in that the money needs to be paid to the lessor - Westminster council.

          Should this paperwork have been updated when I purchased the property? This was the only paperwork that my solicitor presented me with. I'm wondering where this leaves me now. The other freeholder is demanding his insurance money back and refusing to pay it, is my only recourse to take him to court?

          Many thanks for anyones assistance on this.

          Comment


          • #6
            Then I suggest that you go to HMLR and download the freehold register and see what leases the property is currently subject to. if it only refers to the head lease , then you will ahve to look a that title and see if the flats have under leases.

            Then we know what documents to locate to see who does what.
            Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              I have trawled the internet etc. and made some phone calls but as soon as I mention the fact that the boundary wall in our front garden has developed cracks, we are refused cover.

              We have done some investigating and suspect that the cause of the cracks on the boundary wall is a large tree...
              08-08-2017, 06:49 AM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              Agreed. I found that out when shopping around before renewal with the existing insurer. Good job I did not tell the existing insurer where to go in a fit of pique....
              08-08-2017, 17:55 PM
            • Insurance shot up due to water leaks from upstairs.
              Flashback1966
              I have an irresponsible landlord upstairs. Twice, the ceiling has fallen due to a water leak.

              The council are useless and gave no help.

              My insurance has gone up, as I have had two claims during recent years.

              Is there anything I can do about this? Can the upstairs...
              08-08-2017, 15:53 PM
            • Reply to Insurance shot up due to water leaks from upstairs.
              JK0
              What did you expect if you claimed on insurance rather than sued the guy?
              08-08-2017, 16:23 PM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Flashback1966
              I don't understand why you did n't make a claim under the current insurance?

              I had a similar situation with a front garden wall, was leaning. The insurance company sent a surveyor at no cost to me.

              Whilst the house had strong foundation and was n't impacted by subsidence....
              08-08-2017, 15:48 PM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              JK0
              I believe you are over thinking this. You definitely want your existing policy to continue, as this will likely be the only firm who will insure for subsidence at a reasonable cost in the future. Also, I would not like to try to claim on your old policy if you have stopped it in favour of someone e...
              08-08-2017, 10:09 AM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              We shopped around a bit when our existing insurer gave us the renewal quote and terms. We could not (at that time) find any other insurer that would offer us an all-inclusive policy. They either declined to insure us or offered to insure us on FLEA terms so we grudgingly renewed on FLEA terms with our...
              08-08-2017, 09:57 AM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              JK0
              I would just pay the premium asked. The cost of the works should be covered under last year's policy, assuming you claimed. (Did/have you?)

              Changing companies now will be incredibly expensive, if you are able to get cover at all.
              08-08-2017, 09:46 AM
            • Reply to Subsidence cover
              Lorimer
              Tee hee. Crack on, I get it!

              Seriously though - we first noticed a small crack on the boundary wall around 8 months ago while we were still within an 'all-inclusive' insurance policy. We set out about monitoring the crack and sure enough it got bigger and bigger as the months went by. We...
              08-08-2017, 09:33 AM
            • Contents Insurance
              HantsAgent
              Is it legal for a landlord to insist that their tenant has adequate insurance for their contents and accidental damage to the landlord's property?

              I'm a relatively small independent agency, so I don't "sell" insurances, but I always thought you couldn't force someone to take an...
              08-08-2017, 08:39 AM
            Working...
            X