Sufficient Insurance

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sufficient Insurance

    I've just paid over £200 to have my building valued for insurance reinstatement purposes. The report shows that I was under insured by twenty per cent. I've now upped my insurance cover.

    I sincerely hope that all the people who have recently suffered as a result of the bad weather and tornadoes are sufficiently insured (both buildings and contents). Or insured at all?

    I expect that the couple hundred pounds spent revaluing today, coupled with insuring at the correct level will ensure that I won't come a cropper as a result of some unforeseen event in future.

    Are you sufficiently insured?

    Presumably because your real 'rebuild' value had departed from the extrapolated (index-linked?) figure your insurers had been working to...? How long had it been since you'd last had the place valued, out of interest? I'm wondering how long it takes for the figure you obtain when you buy a property to go signifcantly out of step with reality.


      It was last valued 11 years ago when I purchased.


        It is very important that you review the sum insured of your buildings cover to ensure that it is sufficient. Some may underinsure their property to reduce the premium payable but this can prove to be a false economy if you need to claim on your policy. The amount payable for a claim can be reduced by the insurer if the sum insured of the policy is insufficient for the property.

        A survey by a qualified person is the only real way to get the figure right but why not visit, a calculator on the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors website to give a guide as to whether your buildings are sufficiently insured.

        at UKinsuranceNET, we do have a lot of customers who alter the sum assured of their policy mid term after a valuation for mortgage purposes which may suggest that if not surveyed or reviewed for some years then then sums insured can become incorrect, even with indexation.

        I would add that it is up to the individual to ensure they have sufficient cover and to seek advice if they are unsure, if paying for a survey is not an option.

        visit to submit an enquiry or purchase landlords insurance online




          Members should be aware that those online calculators are only of vague use for not very old, conventional houses with two storeys or less.


            Also remeber that reinstatement cost is not same thing as market value; latter could be lower, but is usually higher.
            If you claim on a policy when property is under-insured on reinstatement value, insurer may scale down claim pro-rata.
            JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
            1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
            2. Telephone advice: see
            3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
            4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).


              Sufficent but not too MOCH

              Flat owners at risk of having dual insurance

              Sarah Hills

              Flat owners may be individually insuring their property in a block of flats with some direct insurers; a move that one broker believes amounts to unethical practice.

              Neil Cook, of independent intermediary Delite Insurance Agency, claimed that taking out individual building cover for a flat in a block was unethical and accused some direct writers of mis-selling cover.

              He commented: "This leaves major issues about reinstatement, if there is a claim for example, and it is also not giving good advice. The public needs to be made aware of this and brokers should also be aware and use it as a tool to get back into the market."

              Mr Cook became aware of the problem when managing the insurance for a client's premises: "I was surprised when he said his bank had persuaded him to take out building cover when he arranged his mortgage with them four years ago. This was despite living in a flat that was part of a block of eight.

              "Lenders are not supposed to insist that you take out building insurance, but word their letters to make you think that you should."

              Traditionally, a flat is insured as part of the block and often flat owners pay insurance as part of their service charge: "I have heard of cases of insurance being paid as part of the service charge and charged by the lender too," added Mr Cook. "It is overly unnecessary and complicated if people are enticed to insure single flats because they don't realise that they may already be covered. I would say that about 25% of flat owners are dual insured."

              Neil NEW direct dial 0208 8509697


              Latest Activity


              • Insurance broker relationship
                by Stacker
                If the company is the freeholder called the principal and the directors called its agents. Could an insurance broker be called an agent of the company also and would the insurance broker owe fiduciary duties to the company?
                07-07-2020, 19:02 PM
              • Reply to Insurance premiums going through the roof
                by Section20z

                More likely there was a big claim and the renewal went up so the only way to get reasonable cover was to accept a high excess.
                You can ask for claims history but I doubt they would tell you it had been declined, they don't normally decline renewals,. Just put price up so...
                06-07-2020, 12:55 PM
              • Insurance premiums going through the roof
                by flyingfreehold
                Those seeking renewals of buildings policies will find that insurers are taking a much tougher line especially where there have been chunky losses and premia are rising dramatically

                A broker put it to me this way. In 2020 insurers have made negative income on its investments therefore...
                17-05-2020, 10:41 AM
              • Reply to Insurance premiums going through the roof
                by flyingfreehold
                I think the present insurers are perfectly reputable. I cant see that there is a way of ascertaining that the previous insurer declined. Companies are fickle and they do from time to time exit specific types of cover....
                06-07-2020, 08:53 AM
              • Reply to Insurance premiums going through the roof
                by desamax
                Our excess have been increased, the 'escape of water' one is now 5K from £250 all others have doubled. This is a mixed use property all sold off on long leases. we have a feeling our landlord has had the insurance declined by the long standing insurer and we now have some unknown underwriter, the policy...
                04-07-2020, 12:47 PM
              • Reply to Leasehold Second Home insurance
                by Rincewind
                yes but . . . the lease says

                "The lessor will at all times during said term (unless such insurance shall be vitiated by any act or default of the Lessee) insure and keep insured the building including all common areas and common services against fire and such other risks (if any) as...
                29-06-2020, 17:06 PM
              • Leasehold Second Home insurance
                by Rincewind
                Hi All

                I have a leasehold holiday home (flat).

                The lease states: . . . "the lessor will at all times during said term (unless such insurance shall be vitiated by any act or default of the Lessee) insure and keep insured the building including all common areas and common...
                27-06-2020, 09:18 AM
              • Building Insurance
                by hexu
                The dispute has happened since the change of freehold.

                I was told by my conveyancing solicitor that building insurance is arranged by the Landlord for the common parts only and I must insure the flat myself. My lender also informed building insurance I must take out to hold as a condition...
                30-05-2020, 16:10 PM
              • Reply to Building Insurance
                by hexu
                Hi ATC, I seem to misunderstand your point previously. My solicitor has written to the freeholder, but he does not accept our position. His reply is shown as below:

                "Insurance companies are unable to cover the structure of the building and common parts of the building without taking...
                27-06-2020, 19:00 PM
              • Reply to Leasehold Second Home insurance
                by Section20z
                I think your best bet is to notify the insurers directly that it is occasionally vacant for longer periods . (As long as your lease has no clause against it) otherwise you may be liable as you say.
                Failing that make sure it's occupied at least once a month.
                You can use C19 as a valid excuse...
                27-06-2020, 12:01 PM