Insurance didn't pay out, was this right?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Insurance didn't pay out, was this right?

    Hi,
    I let a house to a scumbag who left the property in a bad state and stole the boiler, plus other smaller items.
    Called my insurance who advised that it wasn't covered as he hadn't "broken in to the property". He had the keys, therefore he wouldn't need to break in.
    I accepted it at the time but looking back doesn't seem fair, doesn't actually make any sense at all.
    I've since repaired the property and just as it was nearing completion it got broken into and the boiler was taken again, flooding the place and causing loads more damage. This time the insurance wouldn't pay out as it was empty for more than 60 days, fair enough.
    The first "claim" was going back about 2-3 years, so may be out of time anyway now, but just to know if I was treated correctly.
    The insurance was from one of the mainstream providers and was a correct landlord type policy.
    thanks
    Phil.

    #2
    Sadly I'm unable to read the terms of the insurance policy(s) from here but if you read it it should tell you.

    Did you change locks after he left?

    Have you reported both thefts to Police & got a CRN each?
    I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

    Comment


      #3
      Boilers are strange things to steal!

      A typical insurance policy would have those exclusions, but, as already pointed out, we'd need to see the wording of yours.

      The correct approach is to get a criminal conviction and then sue the offender on the back of that, at least for the first one.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
        Boilers are strange things to steal!
        Probably the same guy, he knew there would be a brand new boiler there and obviously has a market for them. (Or fancied a new one for himself).

        Try proving that though.

        Comment


          #5
          Have you seen what Shea from 'The Shea Show' has to do in Detroit?

          There he removes the furnace & water tank as soon as someone moves out, and they are only reinstalled on the day a new tenant moves in.

          I wonder if that is a possibility for you?

          Comment


            #6
            Theft by people lawfully allowed in the home is generally not covered. There is a chance it could fall under a "Malicious Damage by Tenant" claim but you would firstly need this cover is place and secondly need an insurer that considers the removal of the boiler as malicious damage. Only your insurer T&Cs can answer that.

            The second instance is a straight forward theft (and consequential damage from the theft). Every insurer has different rules on how long this cover can remain in force while unoccupied. It seems you have accepted their 60 day terms but maybe consider looking at specific unoccupied property policies that can provide full cover for the full policy term for protection going forward.
            Steve Smith - Company Director at a leading Landlord Insurance broker with 20+ years experience in the industry
            LandlordZONE Verified Poster and Topic Expert for Landlords Insurance since 2009
            See my profile for contact details

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              davebhoy
              Hello

              I own and am the landlord of a flat. The flat below is landlord owned and has tenants, the flat below them is owner occupied

              There has been an issue with a leak from the flat below mine into the flat below his, it has caused damage to the bathrooms in both flats....
              20-03-2019, 21:10 PM
            • Reply to A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              jpkeates
              It's one of those situations where the widely held belief, that it's always the responsibility of whoever had the leak who ends up paying for the damage, is wrong.
              But it's so widely held that lots of people pay out and it starts to become true.
              22-03-2019, 15:04 PM
            • Reply to A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              Gandolf
              If its a leak from radiator and went though 2 flats and is visable im sure you will have noticed, you would have had to top boiler up and bleed radiators. Hes trying it on already said hasn't got insurance so hes blaming you
              21-03-2019, 18:43 PM
            • Reply to A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              davebhoy
              Thanks very much, I'm going round to have a look this evening, and I'll be calling a plumber tomorrow and speaking to the insurance company once I've spoken to the plumber

              the flat below and is already talking about who pays and the flat below them is talking about liability already....
              21-03-2019, 17:10 PM
            • Reply to A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              jpkeates
              There's no default liability for a leak.
              Leaks happen, and unless there's been either negligence or a deliberate act to cause the leak, the question of liability doesn't arise.
              And as there isn't really anything anyone can do to "maintain" pipework, negligence is a bit of a stretch....
              21-03-2019, 14:34 PM
            • Reply to A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              buzzard1994
              You can get a leak from a bedroom if the bedroom has a radiator. I have experience of a leaking central heating pipe under floorboards causing damage to a room below. It was a real pain to find as at first it appeared to be penetrating damp. You can also get leaks running a fair way under floorboards...
              21-03-2019, 10:29 AM
            • Airbnb Insurance cover.
              Phizzel
              I rent a cottage. My tenant has asked to use a room for Airbnb for holiday lets.. My insurer has said it will negate the Cover they provide..They will cover for a lodger but not for Airbnb.. I rang another Insurer who provide cover but only if Airbnb is being provided within where the homeowner lives....
              20-03-2019, 16:31 PM
            • Reply to Airbnb Insurance cover.
              ashburnham
              Airbnb not a problem but as the tenant want to arrange it, it falls under the "sub-letting" category which makes most insurers run a mile. Think you will have trouble getting the cover you need, coupled with other potential issues as per above post, I think this is more hassle than it's w...
              21-03-2019, 10:26 AM
            • Reply to A slightly more complicated water damage issue
              ashburnham
              I would just relay everything in your post to your landlord insurer. I do not know the extent of coverage on your insurance policy but things that will help are:

              "Trace and Access" cover which would cover the locating and repairing of the leak
              "Property Owners Liability"...
              21-03-2019, 09:58 AM
            • Insrance cover for leaseholder
              gmt4114
              Hello, I inherited a
              downstairs
              flat in a typical terraced street, I also am the leaseholder for the upstairs flat, I receive no benefit for this I think the term is peppercorn lease. I have asked D Line for a quote on the flat I own and they have quoted me for this but they said I have to have cover...
              20-03-2019, 14:51 PM
            Working...
            X