House insurance lessee responsibility

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    House insurance lessee responsibility

    I recently bought a downstairs leasehold flat. It is a block of 8 flats, four along and 2 stories.The lease states that the leaseholder is responsible for ensuring the flat that has been insured and if this is not adequately done then the freeholder has the right to take out insurance and then charge the leaseholder. They can require that I let them have my insurance policy details. My solicitor says this practice is becoming more common. Initially I took out insurance whilst the flat was empty whilst I undertook work and then reported a change to the insurance company when the tenant moved in. The insurance company at this point initially said that the freeholder should insure the property and cancelled the insurance but then reinstated it when I was able to let them know that the freeholder definitely did not have insurance. They warned me that if anyone else in the building (7 other flats) has either insured the whole building (double insurance) or under-insured this will invalidate my insurance. The agent acting on behalf of the freeholder will only confirm they do not take out insurance for the building. I have no idea what the arrangements with the other 7 flats are and have no idea who the leaseholders are (if indeed they are leaseholders). Can I require the the freeholder confirms that all the other flats in the building are adequately insured and would they be liable if other parties have not adequately insured their flats? Many thanks

    There is no such thing as the insurance described (for the building). Please let us know the exact wording of the lease.

    It sounds to be a defective lease that is not possible to implement. May be worth FTT submission to determine how lessees are supposed to comply and to change the lease.

    You solicitor is talking rubbish about "says this practice is becoming more common".


      Under the leasehold system, the freeholder is the legal owner of the building whilst the leaseholders own a long term rental agreement called a lease. From the insurance company's point of view, the building must be insured by the property owner. Leaseholders don't own the building and do not have an insurable interest.

      I agree with Andrew , your solicitor is talking rubbish.


        Hi Guys, many thanks for your responses and sorry for delay in responding. I have been away. Can I ask what FTT is? (sorry, new to this) and I have scanned a copy of the lease, clause m, that I have but my photocopy misses out the words on one edge. If this is not okay I will have to try and get a copy of the actual document from my solicitor. Sorry it appears that the scanned copy is far too big to attach. I will need to type it out myself in Word and send it to you soon, thanks


          Hi Guys I have photographed the 2 pages over which clause m extends and it seems that the system will take it in this format. Let me know if it is sufficiently clear for you to assess, thanks Andrew
          Attached Files


            First Tier Tribunal

            I would definitely take it to them. You can probably do it without legal assistance and with some studying.

            I cannot see how a lease can oblige 8 individual lessees to insure their part of a building. That is simply not generally possible or feasible (although you could each individually insure the entire block of 8). You must have given wrong information to the insurer to get the insurance in the first place.

            Your solicitor should not have advised you that "this practice is becoming more common" but should have advised you not to purchase the lease at all.


              Many thanks for your response and I will follow this up with the FTT


                Inside the Lease , the Agreement should cover the following items:

                the front section should state :

                the property address ,
                the name of lessor and lessee(s),
                the term of the lease ( 99 years or 125 years etc) and commencing date ,
                the ground rent payable and the subsequent increases ,
                the lessee contribution to service charge account and buildings insurance.

                The second section covers : Lessor and lessees make covenants to each other.

                This section are covenants made by the Lessor and
                This section are covenants made by the lessee..

                The last section should cover disposal of Lease title and the charges payable for registration of legal notices etc by the lessee.

                The building belongs to Lessor so the Lessor has an insurable interest and legal responsibility for inuring the building and making claims under the insurance policy.if the building burns down to the ground.

                The lessee owns a lease and cannot claim against insurance if the lease burns down.

                The leaseholders should set up RTM to claim the landlord's right to insure the building. .


                  Again, thanks for your help on all this, really appreciated


                  Latest Activity


                  • Shop with flying freehold Buildings Insurance question

                    I have a small shop which is part of a bigger residential building. The residential building extends over the full shop. Can anyone recommend how I would get buildings insurance to protect against anything happening in my shop that may affect the property above or to the side? I know...
                    12-07-2018, 19:16 PM
                  • Reply to Shop with flying freehold Buildings Insurance question
                    Mark, I have a contact at Hamilton Fraser who should be able to assist you, if you message me your details I will ask them to call you....
                    15-07-2018, 20:41 PM
                  • Periodic Tenancy and Rent Guarantee Insurance
                    My tenant has a 6 month AST which we're both happy to allow to lapse into a Periodic Tenancy in 2 months time. However, my rent guarantee insurance states "Claims cannot be considered without a signed Tenancy Agreement". I presume that means that without a new signed AST I have no cover...
                    14-07-2018, 06:03 AM
                  • Reply to Periodic Tenancy and Rent Guarantee Insurance
                    I am pretty sure the issue here is that most rent guarantee policies have a condition which states that to submit a claim for rent arrears, the tenant has to be at least 1 month in arrears, and most rent guarantee policies have an excess ( normally equivalent to 1 months rent/deposit). If the tenant...
                    15-07-2018, 20:02 PM
                  • Types of insurance
                    Is there a difference between Residential propety owners insurance and landlord insurance?

                    13-07-2018, 10:07 AM
                  • Reply to Types of insurance
                    Speaking from experience, a Residential Property Owners policy would normally be a policy designed for houses or block of flats which are used for residential purposes, the policyholder would normally be a management company / freeholder or a landlord.( they are designed for property you are not living...
                    15-07-2018, 19:30 PM
                  • Landlord insurance for leasehold property
                    The block is already insured by the management company but it seems like we need landlords insurance but only to cover public liability (if the tenant gets injured at the property and decides to claim) and also the ability to rehouse the tenant if the block suffered any damage and became inhabitable....
                    11-07-2018, 10:59 AM
                  • Reply to Landlord insurance for leasehold property
                    I would recommend speaking to Hamilton Fraser they have a specialist Landlord Policy for Leasehold Flats. You can choose to include the following sections of cover - Leaseholders Fixtures & Fittings, Landlord Contents, Loss of Rental Income or Alternative Accommodation & Public Liability....
                    15-07-2018, 13:32 PM
                  • Insurance admin charges
                    Just a quick question if anybody could answer please.

                    Are my freeholders allowed to charge an administration fee on top of the already extortionate insurance premium? There is nothing in my lease referring to this.

                    I have questioned it and they have quoted they want to be transparent...
                    12-07-2018, 11:40 AM
                  • Reply to Insurance admin charges
                    Yes Gordon999 its exactly the same apart from terrorist cover as my lease specifically states that I don't need to insure for this....
                    15-07-2018, 12:55 PM