House insurance lessee responsibility

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    House insurance lessee responsibility

    I recently bought a downstairs leasehold flat. It is a block of 8 flats, four along and 2 stories.The lease states that the leaseholder is responsible for ensuring the flat that has been insured and if this is not adequately done then the freeholder has the right to take out insurance and then charge the leaseholder. They can require that I let them have my insurance policy details. My solicitor says this practice is becoming more common. Initially I took out insurance whilst the flat was empty whilst I undertook work and then reported a change to the insurance company when the tenant moved in. The insurance company at this point initially said that the freeholder should insure the property and cancelled the insurance but then reinstated it when I was able to let them know that the freeholder definitely did not have insurance. They warned me that if anyone else in the building (7 other flats) has either insured the whole building (double insurance) or under-insured this will invalidate my insurance. The agent acting on behalf of the freeholder will only confirm they do not take out insurance for the building. I have no idea what the arrangements with the other 7 flats are and have no idea who the leaseholders are (if indeed they are leaseholders). Can I require the the freeholder confirms that all the other flats in the building are adequately insured and would they be liable if other parties have not adequately insured their flats? Many thanks

    #2
    There is no such thing as the insurance described (for the building). Please let us know the exact wording of the lease.

    It sounds to be a defective lease that is not possible to implement. May be worth FTT submission to determine how lessees are supposed to comply and to change the lease.

    You solicitor is talking rubbish about "says this practice is becoming more common".

    Comment


      #3
      Under the leasehold system, the freeholder is the legal owner of the building whilst the leaseholders own a long term rental agreement called a lease. From the insurance company's point of view, the building must be insured by the property owner. Leaseholders don't own the building and do not have an insurable interest.

      I agree with Andrew , your solicitor is talking rubbish.

      Comment


        #4
        Hi Guys, many thanks for your responses and sorry for delay in responding. I have been away. Can I ask what FTT is? (sorry, new to this) and I have scanned a copy of the lease, clause m, that I have but my photocopy misses out the words on one edge. If this is not okay I will have to try and get a copy of the actual document from my solicitor. Sorry it appears that the scanned copy is far too big to attach. I will need to type it out myself in Word and send it to you soon, thanks

        Comment


          #5
          Hi Guys I have photographed the 2 pages over which clause m extends and it seems that the system will take it in this format. Let me know if it is sufficiently clear for you to assess, thanks Andrew
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #6
            First Tier Tribunal

            I would definitely take it to them. You can probably do it without legal assistance and with some studying.

            I cannot see how a lease can oblige 8 individual lessees to insure their part of a building. That is simply not generally possible or feasible (although you could each individually insure the entire block of 8). You must have given wrong information to the insurer to get the insurance in the first place.

            Your solicitor should not have advised you that "this practice is becoming more common" but should have advised you not to purchase the lease at all.

            Comment


              #7
              Many thanks for your response and I will follow this up with the FTT

              Comment


                #8
                Inside the Lease , the Agreement should cover the following items:

                the front section should state :

                the property address ,
                the name of lessor and lessee(s),
                the term of the lease ( 99 years or 125 years etc) and commencing date ,
                the ground rent payable and the subsequent increases ,
                the lessee contribution to service charge account and buildings insurance.

                The second section covers : Lessor and lessees make covenants to each other.

                This section are covenants made by the Lessor and
                This section are covenants made by the lessee..

                The last section should cover disposal of Lease title and the charges payable for registration of legal notices etc by the lessee.

                The building belongs to Lessor so the Lessor has an insurable interest and legal responsibility for inuring the building and making claims under the insurance policy.if the building burns down to the ground.

                The lessee owns a lease and cannot claim against insurance if the lease burns down.

                The leaseholders should set up RTM to claim the landlord's right to insure the building. .

                Comment


                  #9
                  Again, thanks for your help on all this, really appreciated

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Buildings insurance for house split into flats
                    james99
                    Need to renew our buildings insurance cover for a house split into flats (Insurance policy is arranged by and in the name of the freeholder) - can anyone recommend who might currently be the most competitive brokers to approach to get some quotes? For info currently pay c£800-900 pa which is for a...
                    06-12-2017, 14:25 PM
                  • Reply to Buildings insurance for house split into flats
                    security2
                    Sounds high.

                    Unless it's in a very high risk area, has previous claims history etc.

                    You are right to query this. If you don't get a satisfactory answer, then threaten to walk away. You might find that will prompt done action. If it doesn't, then...walk away. If this is a bargain...
                    26-05-2018, 22:42 PM
                  • Reply to Buildings insurance for house split into flats
                    CEH
                    Hello I am reading this forum with interest because I am about to buy a 1 bedroom flat in London which is part of a converted three storey house containing 5 flats in total. The annual building insurance premium for my flat will be £950. The seller's solicitor will not disclose the total premium for...
                    26-05-2018, 17:30 PM
                  • Another 'Flood from Above' Question
                    ser999
                    I own a lower ground floor flat. Back in January I noticed water leaking down a wall from the ceiling in my kitchen. I went upstairs and showed the ground floor residents (GFR) the problem and recommended find the source and get the issue rectified. At this stage the damage to my wall was negligible....
                    24-05-2018, 16:27 PM
                  • Reply to Another 'Flood from Above' Question
                    JK0
                    I wouldn't. I suspect winning on the other matters will be satisfaction enough. You don't want to put the judge offside by seeming greedy. They can be sanctimonious so&so's....
                    24-05-2018, 18:29 PM
                  • Reply to Another 'Flood from Above' Question
                    ser999
                    Many thanks for the reply.

                    To me it is a clear cut case of negligence, not only that they were told repeatedly that there was a leak coming from their property that needed fixing, but also when the pipe did finally crack completely they'd gone out leaving the tap running (for 2 hours)....
                    24-05-2018, 17:08 PM
                  • Reply to Another 'Flood from Above' Question
                    JK0
                    Sorry to hear about your problems. People can be such f***wits. Yeah, reject upstairs' offers to decorate. Sue them for the excess. Regarding the laminate, that will just be extra to add to your decorating claim, won't it?
                    24-05-2018, 16:48 PM
                  • Home Insurance
                    mgram
                    I claimed against my landlord insurance Sept 17. The specialist BTL Insurer settled for £950.00. Landlord insurance paid Jan 2018, with slight increase Jan 2018.
                    I am currently renewing my own household insurance with a high St bank and have been advised that ANY claim needs to be reported (even...
                    23-05-2018, 08:10 AM
                  • Reply to Home Insurance
                    AndrewDod
                    This is exactly why you don't make minor claims on insurance policies - and I am afraid £950 is a minor claim. Rather pay lower premium and go for the highest excesses possible. One way or the other you will end up paying the £950 -- or more.
                    23-05-2018, 13:47 PM
                  • Reply to Home Insurance
                    theartfullodger
                    Try broker or other insurers: Different insurers have different rules & processes..

                    Suspect their increase could be challenged on the basis that it is "unfair" but I'd not want to get onto any insurance company(s) black-list...
                    23-05-2018, 10:42 AM
                  Working...
                  X