Overzealous spam control

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Overzealous spam control

    Wrote a post response with a link to an old thread within this forum and posted fine. Realised I linked to the thread rather than the specific post, so edited and corrected the link by removing the existing and reinserting the correct link. So still just the one link, and it's a link to another forum post. Hit save, and a popup tells me the post been flagged as spam and has been moderated.

    I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

    It happens now and again.
    Happened to me, but the Mods will see it and approve it ( assuming all is above board )


      On another forum I visit regularly moderation like this used to happen frequently, and members often complained about their posts getting moderated.

      So admin reduced the severity of the spam filters, which of course then allowed some spam to get through.

      Now there are constant complaints at that forum about the spam getting onto the board.
      It gets cleared off 2 or 3 times a day but some members still complain.

      Spam is a hazard of having a forum these days, the only way to stop it completely is to close your forum to new registrations, which defeats the point of having a forum.
      It's like unwanted phone calls, you can register on the TPS but there is no way to stop them altogether (and some genuine calls will get blocked).

      It's a balancing act - strict spam filters and some genuine posts will get moderated - or less strict filters, less genuine posts moderated but some spam will get through.
      And whichever choice the admin/mods make someone complains.


        It's not either or.

        Part of the problem is the speed of moderation, if more posts are going to get moderated, then they need more active or more in terms of numbers moderators. At the moment, a moderated post can sit for a couple of days before it's seen to. The same apply if there were spam that got through.

        Alternatively, different level of filtering can be applied to different users. A proven user that has been around for months with hundred of okay posts shouldn't need the same filtering as a new users.

        In this particular case that caused me to start the thread, it wasn't even where there were too many links for the level of possible spam that's been checked. There were less than the maximum allowed in the post, it was accepted and posted, and then it was edited so that the link was changed. The number of links stayed the same but suddenly it's not okay any more. And it wasn't even an external link to another website, it was a link to another post on this very forum!
        I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.


          I know I have fallen foul of exactly the same myself.
          edited a link and the new one went to moderation.

          Without going into too much detail this is a common spam tactic.
          Make a post with a genuine link that passes spam filters, then go back later and edit it to the spam link.
          At one time this used to work because edits were not moderated.
          Nowadays the filters consider editing a link as suspicious and flag it for moderation.


            Well TIL the post one is editing doesn't even have to contain any link, just editing in quick succession is enough to trigger the spam filter pulling the post into moderation.
            I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.


              Dont blame the UNPAID moderatrors.

              Blame the spammers that send 60% of all emails sent that has caused this situation.

              Global spam volume as percentage of total e-mail traffic from January 2014 to September 2017, by month.



                Of course I don't blame the moderators. I posted here partly to vent sure, but also partly to see if the admin / operator of the forum can either relax it a bit or put in more fine grain spam control to not catch innocent posts while still keeping the spam out.
                I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.


                Latest Activity


                • Android problem
                  Anybody else having a problem with this site on Android?

                  The standard browser will not connect to it, you get a "not secure site" message.

                  I've put Firefox on the phone and that will connect.
                  But I'm not keen on Firefox for android, it's nowhere near as good...
                  03-06-2018, 15:44 PM
                • Reply to Android problem
                  I'm working on Firefox for android and have a few addons installed which has speeded things up.

                  Might even make it the default if I can get it quicker than the standard browser.
                  05-06-2018, 17:31 PM
                • Reply to Android problem
                  This one's much older than that, Android 4.1.2 on a Galaxy S3 mini.

                  It just seems odd that the standard Android browser can't connect to here because its "not secure" when other browsers have no problem.
                  I also have no problem connecting to other fora from the standard Android...
                  04-06-2018, 13:04 PM
                • Reply to Android problem
                  Working fine typing now, Android 8.1
                  03-06-2018, 17:47 PM
                • Troublesome tennant
                  Hi everyone,

                  I have had a tenant in my property since novemeber 2013 on a assured shorthold tenanancy.

                  She’s payed 1100 PCM since then with 1100 deposit. I served her a section 13 notice around 12 months ago as all the other apartments are rented for 1300 PCM. She flatly...
                  31-05-2018, 15:23 PM
                • Reply to Troublesome tennant
                  Unless she appealed to tribunal against s13 then it will have happened - see.....


                  Simply issue s8 TODAY for all valid grounds (sounds like g10 & 11) and also s21 served TODAY...
                  31-05-2018, 15:30 PM
                • Issue with site
                  Whenever i add a hyperlink to my messages the messages are sent empty. I have tried this on a PC browser, phone browser (Chrome and Edge) and all have the same issue. No error message returned or asn't indication of what i could be doing wrong.

                  Please could someone advise as this was working...
                  16-05-2018, 12:46 PM
                • Reply to Issue with site
                  That's a good offer by moderator2.

                  Personally, where I moderate I also have email notification of moderated posts turned off.
                  There are just too many, which would swamp your email inbox.

                  I do check everyday there by logging into the moderator control panel and looking...
                  18-05-2018, 03:27 AM
                • Reply to Issue with site
                  If people see a message that their post has been sent for moderation then please send me a PM and I will then receive an email notification. I do not receive notifications of moderated posts automatically, and would not want to since many moderated posts really are spam. Remember that the action to...
                  17-05-2018, 12:31 PM
                • Reply to Issue with site
                  I've used and written systems to detect spam, it is possible to make systems user friendly without compromising the security model. Though no system is 100% secure there is a level of tolerance
                  17-05-2018, 10:06 AM