Tenant used to own property

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tenant used to own property

    Hi all. We have owned a property for 16 years which we bought off the person who is and has been the tenant all this time. It has been mortgaged with TMW but now when we come to remortgage back to them as mortgage term has expired they are saying it doesn't meet their criteria as it's a sale and rent back!! But we have owned it 16 years. Anyone else come across this situation? Is this really a problem? We paid the asking price at the time and she has an AST.

    #2
    For the avoidance of doubt, I'm basing my response on my understanding of the situation now, I'm not sure it was the same 16 years ago, but I think it was.

    Originally posted by dizzymill View Post
    Anyone else come across this situation?
    Not personally, but it crops up from time to time.
    Is this really a problem?
    Yes, it's a regulated activity, which means that you're not allowed to do what you have done.
    It's likely to make borrowing impossible or at least very difficult.
    It's unlikely that anyone would do anything about it, but, in theory, the regulator could fine you (although it's quite likely that the issue is so old that they wouldn't).

    When you bought the property, your conveyancer should have told you that what you were proposing wasn't allowed.


    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

    Comment


      #3
      Would this be known as a Home Reversion Plan these days? or is that completely different?
      My views are my own - you may not agree with them. I tend say things as I see them and I don't do "political correctness". Just because we may not agree you can still buy me a pint lol

      Comment


        #4
        Was this an interest only mortgage, then? Have you no savings to pay off the loan?
        To save them chiming in, JPKeates, Theartfullodger, Boletus, Mindthegap, Macromia, Holy Cow & Ted.E.Bear think the opposite of me on almost every subject.

        Comment


          #5
          How do TMW know that your current tenant is the previous vendor?

          Comment


            #6
            There is a question on most mortgage applications asking if the tenant was the previous owner? In the Wild West days this type of activity was marketed by a number of firms dealing in distressed sales with the vendors remaining in situ but as the tenant . A little like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. So unless the applicant intends making a fraudulent declaration to the lender Thea iLife of raising a mortgage or in this case is extremely remote.
            Like most practices previously promulgated by Property experts/ Investment clubs these loopholes have been closed and I for one have no empathy for their demise.

            Comment


              #7
              Sale and rent back is regulated under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, therefore I presume this should not have happened in the first place.

              Tricky situation, though, since the incentive now may be for the LL to issue the tenant with a Section 21. In the name of their own (i.e. the tenant's) protection.
              There is a fine line between irony and stupidity. If I say something absurd please assume that I am being facetious.

              Comment


                #8
                Herewith a link to sale & lease back points - eg 5 year fixed term minimum etc etc..
                https://england.shelter.org.uk/housi...t_back_schemes
                &
                https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/MCOB/4/11.html

                Out of interest, appreciate you paid asking price, how did that compare to typical market prices when you bought, please??
                I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

                Comment


                  #9
                  Kape65 you ask how the lender would know the tenant was the former owner, quite easily it cost the simple fee of £3 by a Land Registry Charge, possibly cheaper on a corporate level. It declared the bane of the purchaser and the previous owners.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    This was never flagged up when we bought the property all those years ago and our solicitor never mentioned it. Would never have bought it and let her remain in it if we knew it wasn't allowed. Not sure what we can do now. Seems very harsh to have to give this elderly lady her notice just so we can remortgage!!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      As I mentioned criteria was far more lax than it is today, having spent 11 years with the leading portfolio lender it was obvious that many lenders seeking. Foothold in the BtL market had little appreciation of the significance of such transactions but the FCA had an important input into the potential issues of such transactions and as a means of sanitising the market from such questionable sales marketing and the vulnerability of distressed sales.
                      For those working or linked to the Buy to Let market will recall the adverts in local/ national newspapers advertising immediate funds / investors willing to buy such property offering prices below the open market value but allowing the unfortunate vendors to remain in their homes.
                      I recall instances where after a specific period had elapsed ,the purchaser ( landlord) increased the rents beyond market norms in order to force tenants to vacate and then subsequently realise the equity which had been achieved by buying between 70%& 80% of the normal value and any subsequent capital growth. Is there any wonder why lenders ask such questions today!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I have undertaken research into what is called “ Sale & Rent Back” there are only three lenders whose criteria might permit such an arrangement, one is a lender of last resort insofar as knowing they have a stranglehold on such cases the rate of interests is significantly higher than what you were applying to TMW. Whether a broker can get a lender to accept a former S&R given the time she has been the tenant is uncertain and because of the time taken to undertake such research the broker would definitely want to levy a Consultation Fee on the basis of the success being doubtful

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by loanarranger View Post
                          For those working or linked to the Buy to Let market will recall the adverts in local/ national newspapers advertising immediate funds / investors willing to buy such property offering prices below the open market value but allowing the unfortunate vendors to remain in their homes.
                          I recall instances where after a specific period had elapsed ,the purchaser ( landlord) increased the rents beyond market norms in order to force tenants to vacate
                          And this is why we became landlords, to stop the possibility of this happening to a relative.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Well obviously this isn't the situation in my case as she has been there for 16 years and paying below market rent. Looks like she will have to leave now though if the property can't be mortgaged. All because computer says no instead of being looked at as an individual.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by dizzymill View Post
                              All because computer says no instead of being looked at as an individual.
                              Well, not really.
                              You did something that's not legal and were lucky not to have been caught before now.

                              I have a lot of sympathy, but it's not a problem because of some stupid technicality.
                              The contract for the sale/purchase of the property can be challenged because the conditions almost certainly weren't complied with.
                              For example, the seller would have had to agree to provide vacant possession, and they didn't.
                              When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                              Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Stand alone garage
                                by chris_guitar
                                Hi, I have a stand alone garage. Worth approx. £35,000. The land is freehold. Does anyone know of any land mortgage company that will accept? I'm open to options. I have thought about paying off half and getting a private loan for the other half. It is on a second charge mortgage, I need to get it...
                                07-11-2021, 13:07 PM
                              • Reply to Stand alone garage
                                by chris_guitar
                                Yes, that is true. However, it is just a brick structure, so buildings insurance is irrelevant. Contents insurance, correct also, however, you just need to bare that in mind. If it is attached to a residential building, I believe you can get insurance.
                                27-11-2021, 20:07 PM
                              • Is it possible to purchase a high value property on a Buy To Let?
                                by Bounce
                                I have been looking for investment property local to where I run my business, which is also where I live. Its more beneficial to live where I work, therefore I have no intention to move.

                                I already have a portfolio of rental property, but they are out of my area, and I am now looking to...
                                27-11-2021, 19:45 PM
                              • Joint landlord advice
                                by Lumox11
                                Hi all,

                                has anyone on here done a BTL with a friend, I’ve been looking for a while but now have a friend who is keen to get on board. We’ve seen a property were preparing to make a bid on. I understand about the joint mortgage and split income tax etc, I was just after any advice...
                                25-11-2021, 14:57 PM
                              • Reply to Joint landlord advice
                                by loanarranger
                                I agree with JPKeates that holding property in an SPV ensures that both directors provide 100% guaranteees for the payment of all associated costs, not least the mortgage, and even if there is a breakdown in the relationship, the liability on each continues until the assets are sold, debts repaid and...
                                27-11-2021, 10:08 AM
                              • Landlord in hospital - family business continuity
                                by Flashback1966
                                I am trying to help a family. (and perhaps a a warning to those landlord who say property is their pension!).

                                The father ran a business, which he sold when he retired. He re-invested the proceeds in property. He has a property portfolio which he incorporated into a limited company. There...
                                26-11-2021, 15:05 PM
                              • Reply to Landlord in hospital - family business continuity
                                by Neelix
                                Speaking from very recent personal experience and hope that people take note of this as its extremely relevant to many families.

                                My brother died suddenly and unexpectedly in July. Not married, no children - so I'm his NOK - and a visit from the police at 3am delivered the sad news
                                ...
                                27-11-2021, 09:05 AM
                              • Reply to Landlord in hospital - family business continuity
                                by Neelix
                                If the father passes away all his accounts will be probably be frozen, so no money in and no money out

                                this sounds like a disaster about to happen whether the father improves or dies

                                Who is the fathers accountant ?

                                change is required asap

                                the family...
                                26-11-2021, 20:25 PM
                              • Reply to Landlord in hospital - family business continuity
                                by Hudson01
                                I cannot answer all of it but the banking side i may be able to shed some light, if he passes away then the bank are duty bound to stop all activity on the accounts if he is the only signatory, a Ltd company is looked upon in a similar way as a person, if he is the sole director and only signatory then...
                                26-11-2021, 19:31 PM
                              • Reply to Landlord in hospital - family business continuity
                                by ash72
                                First of all the banks would put a freeze on his bank accounts as soon as they are notified that he has died, unless there is a named person they would not be able to get access until probate or the executors have been instructed (if there was a will). The best thing at the moment is probably add named...
                                26-11-2021, 19:29 PM
                              Working...
                              X