BTL conversion to residential with no ERC

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    BTL conversion to residential with no ERC

    Hi, would it be possible for me to buy a house as first time buyer under buy to let, and then within a year move in and convert my mortgage to a residential one without having to pay early repayment charge (ERC)? I read somewhere that for first time buyers BTL does not come with an option not to exclude ERC. But could not find out more about this.

    There are so many lenders with so many B2L products you're probably best contacting B2L broker specialists., like NRLA tame ones... There's probably some options..

    Early repayment charge is ERC. EPC is something very different.

    Need to convert mortgage type to residential 1st, not after you move in, if terms anything like those I've ever seen.
    I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...


      Sorry I meant ERC, edited to include.

      So what your saying is that it is possible?


        Ask as big broker. I dunno.

        And if there is such an offering, no idea if you'd qualify for it.
        I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...


          In buy to Let terms there are no schemes which do not come with without ERC’s. I would suggest that you firstly establish how much you might be able to borrow using your income given that any subsequent request for the loan to be converted to a residential mortgage would be based rather on a rental stress calculation for BtL. further as a residential mortgage the loan falls under the regulated loan criteria which will normally require the loan to be repaid on a Capital & Interest basis whereas BtL’s are normally on Interest Only.
          Putting aside no ERC’s which are standard for BtL’s , it is important that you investigate only those lenders who facilitate both types of borrowing since many of the niche BtL lenders do not.
          As and when you make an application to change the structure of the mortgage the lender will ask for the reason for wanting the change and if it is felt that you have tried to circumvent the normal criteria of eligibility for homeownership they would not only decline your request but place a marker on the mortgage to ensure that you haven’t simply moved into the property, were that to be discovered it is highly probable that you will be given three months to refinance.


            Not sure if this will help you or not, but if you buy the house on a normal residential mortgage, you can often ask the lender to give you permission to let it out on that mortgage. Once you decide to move back in again, you just let them know again. I did this myself with Natwest. Think they charged around £100 for this.



              Thanks for the reply, the reason why I want a BTL first is because I already have had an offer accepted on a house. My deposit was >50%. I already have a residential mortgage in principle. The problem is the tenant inside is not leaving. So I want to take over landlord ship and evict the tenant myself and then move in. Given the current circumstances it will take 9-12 months to evict the tenant so that’s why I think it’s best i get a BTL for the time being and then change to residential. Not sure if I can get a consent to let with a residential mortgage with sitting tenants.


                You would not be able to complete on a residential mortgage whilst the tenant is in situ , If you were able to secure a Buy to Let mortgage , you would have to put in place an AST which would have to be for a minimum of 6 months, if the current tenant is proving to be a challenge then he/she/ they could scupper the transaction being completed by refusing to have a new Tenancy .


                  The tenant is currently on a periodic tenancy agreement, wouldn’t that transfer over to me if I take over?


                  Latest Activity


                  • Limited company vs landlord
                    by Smilerkel86
                    Recently reading more and more posts on here and coming across quite a few landlords who have made a limited company.
                    What made you do this?
                    Are there financial benefits?
                    Tax benefits?
                    Is it something I should look at?
                    I have 3 buy to let properties, 2 are mortgaged....
                    04-01-2022, 20:46 PM
                  • Reply to Limited company vs landlord
                    by L4NDLORD
                    There are a lot of merits to a landlord operating as a limited company. This is particularly so in an era of higher stamp duty land tax. Much simpler to transfer a share than a property...There is a much lower stamp duty on shares in a companythat real property; plus its much simpler to give a few away...
                    18-01-2022, 05:19 AM
                  • Reply to Limited company vs landlord
                    by SouthernDave
                    Depends if your going to run your property empire like a proper business or not. Also consider your overall tax position, long term goals and tax planning. Each persons individual situation makes doing BTL through ltd company worthwhile or not....
                    17-01-2022, 21:35 PM
                  • Reply to Limited company vs landlord
                    by jpucng62
                    I think the tax advantage of being able to take dividends instead of income has been reduced recently....
                    17-01-2022, 13:08 PM
                  • Reply to Limited company vs landlord
                    by Gordon999
                    The Times Newspaper ( Sat 13 Jan 2022,) Money Section page 62 &63 reported on BTL owners putting properties into a company..

                    The paper showed there are 228,743 BTL limited companies by end of 2021.

                    A company director can take £2000 in tax free dividends .
                    17-01-2022, 10:00 AM
                  • Reply to Mortgage News
                    by jpkeates
                    I suspect the reverse will be true, to be honest.
                    I suspect that many (most?) landlords don't have any idea of most of the recent changes in regulations for landlords - the people who contribute to this forum are not representative of landlords in general.

                    The awareness of landlords...
                    14-01-2022, 09:54 AM
                  • Mortgage News
                    by loanarranger
                    The following article has appeared in one of the Mortgage Trade journals reporting on views expressed by the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries an influential trade body within the mortgage industry.

                    "Mortgage rates are likely to rise in the first quarter of 2016 as lenders look...
                    23-12-2015, 19:43 PM
                  • Reply to Mortgage News
                    by loanarranger
                    Thank you both for your constructive responses, it is evident from your views particularly as you are seasoned professionals that a significant number of less well informed investors will possibly take fright at the ramifications of the proposed changes. Although I am an investor as well as a specialist...
                    13-01-2022, 22:53 PM
                  • Reply to Mortgage News
                    by jpkeates
                    The Minimum Energy Performance of Buildings Bill which is only a start point set the limit at £20,000.
                    In discussions, there was a view that that figure might have to be reduced to £10,000.

                    That was a private members bill.
                    But it was the work of the MP who was murdered and...
                    13-01-2022, 16:30 PM
                  • Reply to Mortgage News
                    by boletus
                    Do you think that cap level is likely? The consequences are quite obvious.

                    (On a personal note, this would be a win for me as all my rentals would quite easily get to C and it would drive out the competition. Plus I'd upgrade my F ppr to a bigger F ppr.)...
                    13-01-2022, 16:14 PM