Suggestion for renaming this forum

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jeffrey
    replied
    Then Tiny Tim would never have had the chance to Tiptoe Through the Tulips. See http://uk.ask.com/web?q=tiny+tim+%22...=196&o=0&l=dir

    Leave a comment:


  • jta
    replied
    Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
    Blimey. Scrooge had nothing on you!
    Scrooge was an amateur! I woulda roasted Tiny Tim, wiv all the trimmings, an' I would uv had his good drumstick for me dinner.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
    Now that HIPs are no longer obligatory, perhaps this thread could concentrate on those measures which are, and be re-named 'EPCs/Energy Efficiency Matters'.

    It's a serious suggestion and I hope the Editor will consider it.
    Perhaps 'Energy Reports (and former HIPs/HCRs)'.
    The now-abolished requirements might still be relevant (e.g. re any prosecutions still pending for non-compliance).

    Leave a comment:


  • mind the gap
    replied
    Originally posted by jta View Post
    Better. Government unnecessary form filling. (GUFF).
    Blimey. Scrooge had nothing on you!

    Go and massage the cat or something?

    Leave a comment:


  • jta
    replied
    Better. Government unnecessary form filling. (GUFF).

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

Working...
X