Upper flat with historic attic conversion - no search results = ok to let out ???

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Upper flat with historic attic conversion - no search results = ok to let out ???

    Hello. First time landlord here. Am very near completion on an upper Tyneside flat that has 1 bedroom in the attic (total of 2). The conversion looks very very old to me and there is little or no insulation. In order to let this out, is there any ything I need to do? I.e. the present regs do not apply do they? Obviously I will make sure all electrical and gas certs are in order and a fire door fitted, but apart from that?
    Cheers!

    #2
    If its legally classed as an inhabitable bedroom (which should be resolved as part of your purchasing process) I see no reason why not. Building regs dont retrospectively apply - if they did, half of the country would be uninhabitable
    Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks. I kind of thought that, but I just wondered (bit nervous... first time BtLer you see) if anyone else had had issues.
      Thanks again

      Comment


        #4
        The above is probably the correct theoretical position. However, just be aware of the practicalities - if the conversion has little insulation, it may drag your EPC rating down to below what it will be allowed to be to rent out as of next year (I presume you've seen the EPC, what rating is it?).

        Also, cost to assume (IMHO) that you will need to improve the insulation at some point in time. Regardless of the correct legal position, you dont want to put tenants in a position that they could even think about starting to claim disrepair, nor put them in a freezing room (knowing the area you talk about very well, I know how cold those flats can get even unextended over winter!).
        Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks MrShed. I hadn't considered EPC rating! However, I do plan to insulate at some point. I suppose I just thought it's been rented out for 20 years before me so it must be ok. There is a radiator up there.

          Comment


            #6
            It's probably fine. Just assume you will need to do it, and then you will have no surprises
            Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

            Comment


              #7
              You should check with local council for "insulation standards" before letting. Also with local estate agent on any local rules.

              Comment


                #8
                We had a discussion about a similar property in the north east recently. We decided against buying it to let because of the risk of someone being trapped in the loft room during a fire. Someone actually posted that they'd been in the situation as tenants but thankfully no one was in the loft room when dated electrics caused a major fire there. They said they'd never rent that kind of property again.

                Obviously, it's up to you, but you should at least consider the worst case scenario risks you might face...

                Comment


                  #9
                  Yes, awful if a fire occurred, but that could be in any old property. I'll make sure there is a fire door, and plenty of smoke alarms.- I'd do that regardless of regs.
                  There is no risk of fire coming up the side of an end gable wall so the escape route is safe, except that it is 25 feet off the floor. Hence I did think a rope ladder would be a safe thing to have, but that would scare a lot of people... think I'll leave it up to them to decide of they want one.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Hi,I am in a similar situation. The attic in the house I am about to let out was converted 35 years ago, without building control or planning. Its fine but doesnt satisfy modern regs in terms of fire safety or head height. I am thinking about renting it out as a 2 bed with a large attic, and pointing out that the attic is not a habitable space, and only for storage. But I am sure, with stairs up to the attic, electricity, heating, etc, the tenant will use it as a third bedroom. Where does that leave me in terms of my liability and my insurance? I have put as much safety in as I can, in terms of smoke detectors on all floors (all connected), but it is not legal, and it would be very difficult to make it legal (for a number of reasons that I wont go into, including head height at the stairs, as well as fire safety). Any experts out there know what position that leaves me in??

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Col13,

                      Was it compliant back in 1983? If so then no issue.

                      I suppose its no different to renting a normal 2 bed to a couple and them occasionally having friends to sleep over. I think if you tell them that its for storage only, and maybe a sign to that effect on the stairs up to it, then you will have protected yourself.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        It was probably compliant in 1983, but the conversion was never applied for. So there are no planning approvals, and no building warrants. So the rules then are probably irrelevant. I would have to make it compliant now, even though it was done 40 years ago.

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • retrospective notice of assignment
                          eagle
                          Hi,
                          bit of an oddity, my freeholder has come back (this was brought to light by change of bank account by new owner) that they don't have a notice of assignement... for a transaction back in 2012. Me (my flat) to the new owner.

                          Everything else is in place and I am on good terms with...
                          04-06-2019, 10:48 AM
                        • Reply to retrospective notice of assignment
                          eagle
                          Hi,
                          a rather late reply but its taken this long to get over the line.
                          I checked others leases obtained from Land Registry and they were all the same, notice only specified in writing, nothing else.
                          In between they wrote asking again for the notice to be sent (via solicitor) or would...
                          23-08-2019, 13:46 PM
                        • Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                          Loftmonster
                          My wife and I are in the process of remortgaging our home to a BTL and buying a new home.

                          I've been in discussions with a mortgage advisor for the last couple of weeks. The purchase mortgage is straight forward but the BTL mortgage is proving a bit more difficult to decide upon. We...
                          21-08-2019, 00:59 AM
                        • Reply to Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                          loanarranger
                          What is the research provided by your broker in focusing on BM Solutions , they are no longer a lender who is the automatic 1st choice

                          Ask your broker why he didn't quote the following:-
                          Santander 1.39% 27 months fixed including Free Legals
                          Barclays 1.41% 27 months fixed including...
                          21-08-2019, 16:27 PM
                        • Reply to Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                          Loftmonster
                          Thank JP, yeah i was thinking we should fix for longer but if landlording doesn't work out we will have to pay big early repayment charges if we sell.

                          The lender our broker has recommended (BM Solutions) pays £300 casback on legal fees. Our solicitor is quoting almost a grand so thats...
                          21-08-2019, 08:14 AM
                        • Reply to Remortgaging to a BTL so much to pay!
                          jpkeates
                          Most BTL mortgage lenders will use their own solicitor for conveyancing at no (direct) cost to the lender).
                          You usually can add the product fee to the amount borrowed - on the basis that you hope the property value increases by at least that.

                          While I appreciate that landlording may...
                          21-08-2019, 07:48 AM
                        • Address wrong on Land Registry Title. A little rant. and request for empathy.
                          Logical.Lean
                          We are buying a property built in 1847, with some interesting history, and are somewhat frustrated by the both our own solicitor and the vendor and their solicitor.

                          Since having our offer accepted, on a house with no chain, either end, it has been 16 weeks, but the last 4 weeks have been...
                          06-08-2019, 18:50 PM
                        • Reply to Address wrong on Land Registry Title. A little rant. and request for empathy.
                          Logical.Lean
                          So eventually I phoned the Estate agent and explain that I'm now being told by our solicitor that the vendors solicitor had put in this application, but I'd like proof, if that were possible.
                          30 mins later she sent an email, which had an email.from.their solicitor saying it had been done on the...
                          20-08-2019, 09:50 AM
                        • Solicitors Negligence Question
                          Freddie thumb
                          I'm read these forums for a little while and just signed up to ask a quick question. I'm not sure if this is 8n 5he right place.

                          So I bought a property in 2008 and discovered that the Title to my property was defective in 2015. Basically there was a piece of land on the title of my property...
                          12-08-2019, 08:40 AM
                        • Reply to Solicitors Negligence Question
                          Lawcruncher
                          Are you saying that the Land Registry plan does not match the apparent boundaries of the land you occupy? If so, is the problem that you occupy land not shown as yours on the plan or that a neighbour occupies land shown as yours on the plan?
                          16-08-2019, 09:46 AM
                        Working...
                        X