Upper flat with historic attic conversion - no search results = ok to let out ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Col13
    replied
    It was probably compliant in 1983, but the conversion was never applied for. So there are no planning approvals, and no building warrants. So the rules then are probably irrelevant. I would have to make it compliant now, even though it was done 40 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • wfd_property
    replied
    Col13,

    Was it compliant back in 1983? If so then no issue.

    I suppose its no different to renting a normal 2 bed to a couple and them occasionally having friends to sleep over. I think if you tell them that its for storage only, and maybe a sign to that effect on the stairs up to it, then you will have protected yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Col13
    replied
    Hi,I am in a similar situation. The attic in the house I am about to let out was converted 35 years ago, without building control or planning. Its fine but doesnt satisfy modern regs in terms of fire safety or head height. I am thinking about renting it out as a 2 bed with a large attic, and pointing out that the attic is not a habitable space, and only for storage. But I am sure, with stairs up to the attic, electricity, heating, etc, the tenant will use it as a third bedroom. Where does that leave me in terms of my liability and my insurance? I have put as much safety in as I can, in terms of smoke detectors on all floors (all connected), but it is not legal, and it would be very difficult to make it legal (for a number of reasons that I wont go into, including head height at the stairs, as well as fire safety). Any experts out there know what position that leaves me in??

    Leave a comment:


  • bowsden
    replied
    Yes, awful if a fire occurred, but that could be in any old property. I'll make sure there is a fire door, and plenty of smoke alarms.- I'd do that regardless of regs.
    There is no risk of fire coming up the side of an end gable wall so the escape route is safe, except that it is 25 feet off the floor. Hence I did think a rope ladder would be a safe thing to have, but that would scare a lot of people... think I'll leave it up to them to decide of they want one.

    Leave a comment:


  • tatemono
    replied
    We had a discussion about a similar property in the north east recently. We decided against buying it to let because of the risk of someone being trapped in the loft room during a fire. Someone actually posted that they'd been in the situation as tenants but thankfully no one was in the loft room when dated electrics caused a major fire there. They said they'd never rent that kind of property again.

    Obviously, it's up to you, but you should at least consider the worst case scenario risks you might face...

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon999
    replied
    You should check with local council for "insulation standards" before letting. Also with local estate agent on any local rules.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShed
    replied
    It's probably fine. Just assume you will need to do it, and then you will have no surprises

    Leave a comment:


  • bowsden
    replied
    Thanks MrShed. I hadn't considered EPC rating! However, I do plan to insulate at some point. I suppose I just thought it's been rented out for 20 years before me so it must be ok. There is a radiator up there.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShed
    replied
    The above is probably the correct theoretical position. However, just be aware of the practicalities - if the conversion has little insulation, it may drag your EPC rating down to below what it will be allowed to be to rent out as of next year (I presume you've seen the EPC, what rating is it?).

    Also, cost to assume (IMHO) that you will need to improve the insulation at some point in time. Regardless of the correct legal position, you dont want to put tenants in a position that they could even think about starting to claim disrepair, nor put them in a freezing room (knowing the area you talk about very well, I know how cold those flats can get even unextended over winter!).

    Leave a comment:


  • bowsden
    replied
    Thanks. I kind of thought that, but I just wondered (bit nervous... first time BtLer you see) if anyone else had had issues.
    Thanks again

    Leave a comment:


  • MrShed
    replied
    If its legally classed as an inhabitable bedroom (which should be resolved as part of your purchasing process) I see no reason why not. Building regs dont retrospectively apply - if they did, half of the country would be uninhabitable

    Leave a comment:


  • Upper flat with historic attic conversion - no search results = ok to let out ???

    Hello. First time landlord here. Am very near completion on an upper Tyneside flat that has 1 bedroom in the attic (total of 2). The conversion looks very very old to me and there is little or no insulation. In order to let this out, is there any ything I need to do? I.e. the present regs do not apply do they? Obviously I will make sure all electrical and gas certs are in order and a fire door fitted, but apart from that?
    Cheers!

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Newly completed property issue with state of property
    by JPM
    Hi a friend has completed on his first home today, and found out last night someone went in and ripped the copper piping out and messed the boiler and electrics etc up. Insurance have said they won’t pay out and its about 8-10k damage to fix.

    His solicitor says he shouldve checked the...
    05-06-2020, 21:55 PM
  • Reply to Freehold purchase
    by Gordon999
    You need to get the site plan for your house separated from the adjacent houses before you can start. It should be the seller side which does this work
    05-06-2020, 16:23 PM
  • Freehold purchase
    by freeholderkid
    Purchasing the freehold for my property being a house with gardens and garage.


    The current leasehold title is part of a larger title plan for the area.


    A TP1 is provided by the council selling the freehold with all the details filled-in except signatures.
    ...
    04-06-2020, 20:54 PM
  • Reply to Search Fee. Was I ripped off.
    by Lawcruncher
    The solicitors may have done a local search, water search and so-called environmental search. Ask for a disbursement bill.
    03-06-2020, 10:01 AM
  • Search Fee. Was I ripped off.
    by Always Problems
    I made an offer on a house.which was accepted. The Estate Agent recommended "their" Conveyancing Firm and I asked if it was "No Sale No Fee" and they said yes.
    Anyway the Conveyancing Firm rang me and I paid a £50 deposit.

    They then wanted another £350 ...
    03-06-2020, 09:38 AM
  • Reply to Field problem
    by Always Problems
    You are in occupation. Presumably if they want to sell they would have to serve you with Notice To Quit. It sounds like that as no rent was ever paid, could you argue that you were given the land. Is the land registered with eth Land Registry. With a small plot of land you could join the Small Farmers...
    03-06-2020, 09:08 AM
  • Field problem
    by U01lsn
    We have a semi rural house which is part of a Hamlet once all owned by my wife’s Nanna and Grandad.
    My wife had used part of this land for 25 years (Her brother had it for 15 years previous to her) to house her animals with a verbal agreement that she could use it until she gave up keeping...
    29-05-2020, 12:23 PM
  • Reply to punishment for not registering a property?
    by Always Problems
    We made a mistake, We had some land which was Unregistered, we sold some of it off but we did not register with the Land Registry what we kept. The person who we sold some of our land to, then registers what we sold including some of the land which we retained. And of course the Land Registry...
    03-06-2020, 09:00 AM
  • punishment for not registering a property?
    by sublimagic
    Hi

    complicated question but I cant seem to find a answer online anywhere, I know its a crime not to register a property with the land registry when it changes hands but does anyone know what the penalty or consequences are? the changeover would have happened in 2000 but is still un registered...
    04-03-2014, 20:08 PM
  • Reply to Help with understanding a Land Registry document regarding Adverse Possession
    by Lawcruncher
    No interest in land is in fact perpetual. The largest estate in land is the fee simple which belongs to the owner and his heirs (to be understood as "and then his heirs"). If you die without heirs the fee simple comes to an end.

    Ignoring that technicality, there are two main reasons...
    02-06-2020, 23:05 PM
Working...
X