Special condition of contract

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Special condition of contract

    If on a contract of sale there is a special condition listed which reads along the lines of: "all information kept in public register is considered to be known by the transferee". Which aspects would this clause cover? Searches with LAs, Landlord status, Management Company status at Co House? Bankruptcy?
    Also does this clause override any other information provided by seller in relation to any of the above?

    #2
    Originally posted by colinbell View Post
    If on a contract of sale there is a special condition listed which reads along the lines of: "all information kept in public register is considered to be known by the transferee". Which aspects would this clause cover? Searches with LAs, Landlord status, Management Company status at Co House? Bankruptcy?
    Also does this clause override any other information provided by seller in relation to any of the above?
    This Special Condition is aimed at Standard Condition 3.1.2(d).
    The latter makes property sold subject to "entries made before the date of the contract in any public register except those maintained by HMLR or its Land Charges Department or by Companies House".
    The Special Condition therefore lumbers P with burden of entries in any other public registers.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #3
      So does that mean that under this clause it is assumed that the buyer knows about entries in a register such as companies house (for example status of landlord company or resident management co)?

      Comment


        #4
        Condition deems P aware of every register's contents. Presumably P's solicitor makes usual searches and these should reveal anything untoward. I always check at Companies House whenever transaction involves a co., either as my client or on other side.
        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

        Comment


          #5
          What happens if a seller provides wrong information (knowingly or innocently) on what is contained in one of these public registers in the sale quest.?

          Is the clause invalid or does it still protect the seller from any comeback?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
            This Special Condition is aimed at Standard Condition 3.1.2(d).
            The latter makes property sold subject to "entries made before the date of the contract in any public register except those maintained by HMLR or its Land Charges Department or by Companies House".
            The Special Condition therefore lumbers P with burden of entries in any other public registers.
            Forgot to mention that the clause on the SC refers to the Law of Property Act 1994. Is this still aimed at Standard Condition3.1.2 d listed above?

            Comment


              #7
              No. Anyway, the clause's reference ought to be to the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1994. This deals with Title Guarantees; see s.3 of the Act re the main difference between the two types usually found.
              JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
              1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
              2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
              3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
              4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

              Comment


                #8
                Yes it does refer to that act.
                So in essence it does not cover public registers such as companies house and others.

                Regards

                Comment


                  #9
                  Apologies for this:

                  I've checked the paperwork I have and I have copied
                  and pasted the relevant clause it refers to from the PA 1994:

                  6 No liability under covenants in certain cases

                  (2) Furthermore that person is not liable under any of those covenants for anything (not falling within subsection (1))—
                  (a) which at the time of the disposition is within the actual knowledge, or


                  The SC of contract refers to section 6.2 point a above.
                  Now does this only affect title as Jeffrey explained or does it cover other public register such as c house, bankruptcy etc etc

                  Comment


                    #10
                    S.6(2)(a) means that V is not liable under title guarantee if P actually knows of an incumbrance- not just "deemed" knowledge.
                    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                      S.6(2)(a) means that V is not liable under title guarantee if P actually knows of an incumbrance- not just "deemed" knowledge.

                      So the clause does not cover issues relating to landlord co status, management co status and other public registers?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by colinbell View Post
                        So the clause does not cover issues relating to landlord co status, management co status and other public registers?
                        The clause deals with registers of incumbrances.
                        Contrast this with the section which deals with the implied covenants under Title Guarantees.
                        So, no- the clause does not deal with status of companies. Solicitor should simply verify these statuses in the usual way.
                        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • Who owns the loft space?
                          poptwig
                          Hi
                          I am new to this site. I've looked around for an equivalent scenario to my situation but haven't found one. I hope someone can help and this question isn't repetition...
                          I live in a ground floor, purpose-built, maisonette (North London). There is a first floor maisonette above mine....
                          15-08-2011, 00:07 AM
                        • Reply to Who owns the loft space?
                          wfd_property
                          Its really a question for a solicitor. I would query whether you have the loft demised to you, though.

                          Does the other freeholder have a power of attorney who could consent for him?...
                          15-01-2018, 21:53 PM
                        • Reply to Who owns the loft space?
                          Vassena
                          Hi,

                          I know this is an old post but I have a very similar question regarding the ownership of the loft space in our flat which is also a Victorian split conversion (with a share of the freehold). We own tthe top floor flat and are the only owners of the roof. The lease of the lower ground...
                          15-01-2018, 11:58 AM
                        • Easement granted for septic tank drainage
                          cfaproperty
                          This is one for Jeffrey or Lawcruncher - our neighbours have their septic tank drainage on our land and it is permitted in the deeds that they can maintain, repair and renew as necessary for which we have no challenges. The system is leaking effluent onto our land but beyond the system that is outlined...
                          18-05-2013, 13:26 PM
                        • Reply to Easement granted for septic tank drainage
                          wfd_property
                          Seems reasonable that it would so encompass.........
                          13-01-2018, 12:22 PM
                        • Filling first accounts for company
                          pred02
                          Hi,

                          My neighbor and I purchased the freehold for a split flat maisonette. We formed a company to own a share of freehold and need to file out first accounts. As it is two of us we do not use the company for trade, we do not pay ground rent or have a management company. Can we just classify...
                          06-01-2018, 14:48 PM
                        • Reply to Filling first accounts for company
                          wfd_property
                          You don't want a mistake here. The company has (presumably) two shareholders and a rather big asset.

                          Depending how you use it (are you proposing to open a bank account and pay in to a sinking fund each year?) the accounts need to be prepared properly, albeit that there may be only three...
                          13-01-2018, 12:19 PM
                        • Reply to Easement granted for septic tank drainage
                          The buggles
                          Hi .. does anyone know if an easement for emptying and repair of septic tank also encompasses replacement?
                          thanks
                          10-01-2018, 15:48 PM
                        • Reply to Filling first accounts for company
                          Gordon999
                          Look for a shop offering book-keeping and VAT services and ask if they can help with first year filing returns to Companies House.

                          These shops serve small businesses and may be found in parade of shops in outer areas of the town. and will be cheaper than accountant....
                          08-01-2018, 14:26 PM
                        • Reply to Filling first accounts for company
                          pred02
                          Ok, it makes sense. Is it difficult for me to file the company accounts or do I need an accountant to do so? I do not have any other transactions logged in the name of the company. I think the building insurance is also purchased in the company name.

                          Thank you...
                          07-01-2018, 14:25 PM
                        Working...
                        X